Paper · 2020 · International Journal of Vegetable Science

Efficacy and economic comparison of weed management in tomato

Olumide Samuel Daramola; Joseph Aremu Adigun; Patience Mojibade Olorunmaiye; et al.

6
claims
9
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Weed interference in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) reduces fruit yield and economic return under tropical conditions for smallholder growers who pay for labor. Field experiments were conducted in a tropical forest-savanna transition zone to evaluate the efficacy and economic benefits of hand weeding, herbicides and their combination in tomato cultivation. Pre-emergence application of propaben® (metolachor+prometryn) and butachlor, each at 2 kg∙ha−1, plus hand weeding at 40 days after transplanting reduced weed density and biomass, and increased weed control efficacy (57–64%) less than the weed-free check (100%) and better than two hand weedings (45%), or either herbicide applied alone (34–38%). Propaben® or butachlor plus hand weeding increased number of leaves and branches, number of fruit and fruit yield of tomato similar to the weed-free check and better than two hand weedings, or either herbicide applied alone. Although the weed-free check gave similar fruit yield, propaben® or butachlor plus hand weeding was 37–44% higher in net return. Application of propaben® or butachlor alone gave comparable net returns to two hand weedings and the weed-free check, but had a 61–88% higher cost-benefit ratio. Multiple hand weeding did not guarantee the highest yield or net return and increased cost of production. The combination of propaben® or butachlor plus hand weeding will provide higher tomato yield and net return through efficient weed control at relatively lower cost.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Propaben plus hand weeding reduced weed density and biomass and increased control efficacy.

Treatment
propaben® (metolachor+prometryn)e0
Outcome
weed density and biomasse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
two hand weedingse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Pre-emergence application of propaben® (metolachor+prometryn) and butachlor, each at 2 kg∙ha−1, plus hand weeding at 40 days after transplanting reduced weed density and biomass, and increased weed control efficacy (57–64%) less than the weed-free check (100%) and better than two hand weedings (45%), or either herbicide applied alone (34–38%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 361–705 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Butachlor plus hand weeding improved weed control efficacy to 57–64% relative to hand weeding or herbicide alone.

Treatment
butachlor, each at 2 kg∙ha−1, plus hand weeding at 40 days after transplantinge0
Outcome
weed control efficacye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
57–64%e0
Comparator
two hand weedingse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–61 · show in text ↑
e0

“Pre-emergence application of propaben® (metolachor+prometryn) and butachlor, each at 2 kg∙ha−1, plus hand weeding at 40 days after transplanting reduced weed density and biomass, and increased weed control efficacy (57–64%) less than the weed-free check (100%) and better than two hand weedings (45%), or either herbicide applied alone (34–38%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 361–705 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide plus hand weeding increased tomato leaves, branches, fruit number and yield versus two hand weedings or herbicide alone.

Treatment
Propaben® or butachlor plus hand weedinge0
Outcome
number of leaves and branchese0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
two hand weedingse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Propaben® or butachlor plus hand weeding increased number of leaves and branches, number of fruit and fruit yield of tomato similar to the weed-free check and better than two hand weedings, or either herbicide applied alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–930 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide plus hand weeding increased tomato fruit yield and fruit number.

Treatment
Propaben® or butachlor plus hand weedinge0
Outcome
number of fruit and fruit yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
either herbicide applied alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Propaben® or butachlor plus hand weeding increased number of leaves and branches, number of fruit and fruit yield of tomato similar to the weed-free check and better than two hand weedings, or either herbicide applied alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–930 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide plus hand weeding gave 37–44% higher net return than weed-free management.

Treatment
propaben® or butachlor plus hand weedinge0
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
highere0
Value
37–44%e0
Comparator
weed-free checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–61 · show in text ↑
e0

“Although the weed-free check gave similar fruit yield, propaben® or butachlor plus hand weeding was 37–44% higher in net return”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–1059 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide alone gave comparable net returns and a 61–88% higher cost-benefit ratio than two hand weedings and the weed-free check.

Treatment
propaben® or butachlor alonee0
Outcome
cost-benefit ratioe0
Direction
highere0
Value
61–88%e0
Comparator
two hand weedings and the weed-free checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–61 · show in text ↑
e0

“Application of propaben® or butachlor alone gave comparable net returns to two hand weedings and the weed-free check, but had a 61–88% higher cost-benefit ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1061–1221 · show in text ↑

butachlor · weed · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

butachlor · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

herbicide · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 12 positive, 8 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

herbicide · weed · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 23 positive, 7 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

herbicide · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

45 papers: 28 positive, 17 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

transplanting · weed · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.