Paper · 2019

Leaf anatomical responses to drought stress condition in hybrid sugarcane leaf (Saccharum officinarum ‘KK3’)

Worasitikulya Taratima; Thapakorn Ritmaha; Nuntawoot Jongrungklang; et al.

3
claims
8
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Comparative leaf anatomy of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum ‘KK3’) was investigated under early drought stress condition between 30-90 days of planting. Forty anatomical characteristics were studied using a light microscope with significance evaluated by numerical analysis. Results indicated that some anatomical features of sugarcane leaf responded to drought stress. Almost all the anatomical characteristics of unstressed treatments showed higher values than stressed treatments. A total of 21 out of the 40 characteristics showed a significant difference. Leaf thickness, stomatal size and interstomatal adaxial epidermal cell size of treated plants decreased while cuticle thickness of adaxial lamina and stomatal density significantly increased. This is the first report detailing leaf anatomy response to drought stress conditions in Thailand of sugarcane (S. officinarum ‘KK3’). Results will provide useful basic knowledge for a better understanding of the adaptation mechanisms of tolerant sugarcane genotypes under early drought stress conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Twenty one of forty leaf anatomical characteristics differed significantly with drought stress.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Outcome
characteristicse0
Value
21 out of the 40e0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“A total of 21 out of the 40 characteristics showed a significant difference.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 485–561 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf thickness, stomatal size and interstomatal adaxial epidermal cell size decreased under drought.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
drought stresst1
Outcome
Leaf thickness, stomatal size and interstomatal adaxial epidermal cell sizee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf thickness, stomatal size and interstomatal adaxial epidermal cell size of treated plants decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–665 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–73 · show in text ↑
t1

“drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Adaxial lamina cuticle thickness and stomatal density significantly increased under drought.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
drought stresst1
Outcome
cuticle thickness of adaxial lamina and stomatal densitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“cuticle thickness of adaxial lamina and stomatal density significantly increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–753 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–73 · show in text ↑
t1

“drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–43 · show in text ↑

drought · cytology · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.