Abstract
Goal. To determine the technical efficacy of insecticide Belt Expert 480 SC, COP against grape leaf on vineyards, to determine its phytotoxicity and grape productivity indicators. Methods. Field studies were conducted in Ovidiopolsky district of Odessa region, OJSC “Peremoga” on vineyards of Rkatsiteli variety, planting of 2010. Results. In experimental plots when using the Belt Expert 480 SC, KC insecticide, the inflorescence damage 14 days after treatment was within 0.7—1.0%, and that of the brushes — 0.4—0.6%. On the reference variant, these figures were, respectively, 0.6% and 0.3%. The results of the studies showed that the insecticide Belt Expert 480 SC, KC with a flow rate of 0.25 l/ha was slightly less effective than Coragen standard preparation 20 KS with a flow rate of 1.0 l/ha. With an increase in the consumption rate of the test drug to 0.30 l/ha, its effectiveness on the grape leaf was practically at the level of the standard, both for the first and second generation of pests. The insecticidal activity of the studied drug Belt Expert 480 SC, KC at a consumption rate of 0.25 l/ha ranged from 93.7—94.2%. At a consumption rate of 0.30 l/ha, the effectiveness of the drug increased slightly and amounted to 95.6—96.2%, which was at the level of the reference drug Coragen 20 KS — 96.2—97.1%. When determining the yield of grape bushes in the control and experimental plots, there was no significant negative impact of prolonged drought and extreme temperatures during a significant part of the growing season. The estimated grape harvest from the experimental plots using the Belt Expert 480 SC, KC insecticide averaged 5.24—5.45 t/ha, the reference preparation of Coragen 20 KS was 5/47 t/ ha, which is 0.29—0.52 t/ha exceeded the yield of control bushes (4.95 t/ha). Conclusions. Insecticide Belt Expert 480 SC, KC at consumption rates of 0.25 and 0.30 l/ha, applied to grape plantations against the first and second generations of grape leaf showed a high protective effect, which was respectively 93.7—94.2% and 95.6—96.2%. In the applied consumption rates, the Belt Expert 480 SC, KC preparation did not show phytotoxic effects on the annual growth and generative organs of grape bushes.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
At 14 days after Belt Expert treatment, inflorescence damage was 0.7—1.0%.
- Taxon
- grapet0
- Organ / stage
- inflorescencee0
- Treatment
- Belt Expert 480 SC, KC insecticidee0
- Outcome
- inflorescence damagee0
- Value
- 0.7—1.0%e0
- Comparator
- reference variante0
Not reportedDirection
Verbatim
e0“when using the Belt Expert 480 SC, KC insecticide, the inflorescence damage 14 days after treatment was within 0.7—1.0%, and that of the brushes — 0.4—0.6%. On the reference variant, these figures were, respectively, 0.6% and 0.3%.”
t0“grape leaf in vineyards”
Claim · model-written summary
At 14 days after Belt Expert treatment, brush damage was 0.4—0.6%.
- Taxon
- grapet0
- Treatment
- Belt Expert 480 SC, KC insecticidee0
- Outcome
- brushese0
- Value
- 0.4—0.6%e0
- Comparator
- reference variante0
Not reportedDirection
Verbatim
e0“when using the Belt Expert 480 SC, KC insecticide, the inflorescence damage 14 days after treatment was within 0.7—1.0%, and that of the brushes — 0.4—0.6%. On the reference variant, these figures were, respectively, 0.6% and 0.3%.”
t0“grape leaf in vineyards”
Claim · model-written summary
Belt Expert at 0.25 l/ha was slightly less effective than Coragen at 1.0 l/ha.
Verbatim
e0“the insecticide Belt Expert 480 SC, KC with a flow rate of 0.25 l/ha was slightly less effective than Coragen standard preparation 20 KS with a flow rate of 1.0 l/ha.”
t0“grape leaf in vineyards”
Claim · model-written summary
At 0.30 l/ha, Belt Expert effectiveness was practically at the standard level for both pest generations.
Verbatim
e0“With an increase in the consumption rate of the test drug to 0.30 l/ha, its effectiveness on the grape leaf was practically at the level of the standard, both for the first and second generation of pests.”
t0“grape leaf in vineyards”
Claim · model-written summary
Belt Expert activity at 0.25 l/ha ranged from 93.7—94.2%.
- Taxon
- grapet0
- Treatment
- Belt Expert 480 SC, KC at a consumption rate of 0.25 l/hae0
- Outcome
- insecticidal activitye0
- Value
- 93.7—94.2%e0
Not reportedDirection
Verbatim
e0“The insecticidal activity of the studied drug Belt Expert 480 SC, KC at a consumption rate of 0.25 l/ha ranged from 93.7—94.2%.”
t0“grape leaf in vineyards”
Claim · model-written summary
At 0.30 l/ha, Belt Expert effectiveness increased slightly to 95.6—96.2%.
Verbatim
e0“At a consumption rate of 0.30 l/ha, the effectiveness of the drug increased slightly and amounted to 95.6—96.2%, which was at the level of the reference drug Coragen 20 KS — 96.2—97.1%.”
t0“grape leaf in vineyards”
Claim · model-written summary
Belt Expert treated plots yielded 5.24—5.45 t/ha, exceeding control bushes.
Verbatim
e0“The estimated grape harvest from the experimental plots using the Belt Expert 480 SC, KC insecticide averaged 5.24—5.45 t/ha, the reference preparation of Coragen 20 KS was 5/47 t/ ha, which is 0.29—0.52 t/ha exceeded the yield of control bushes (4.95 t/ha).”
Claim · model-written summary
Belt Expert did not show phytotoxic effects on annual growth or generative organs.
- Taxon
- grapee0
- Organ / stage
- annual growth and generative organse0
- Treatment
- Belt Expert 480 SC, KC preparatione0
- Outcome
- did not show phytotoxic effectse0
Not reportedDirection
Verbatim
e0“the Belt Expert 480 SC, KC preparation did not show phytotoxic effects on the annual growth and generative organs of grape bushes.”
The same questions in other papers
insecticide · yield · VitisResults agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.