Paper · 2020 · International Journal of Applied Biology

EFFICACY OF SUNFLOWER RESIDUES AND HERBICIDES IN CONTROLLING WEEDS IN TRANSPLANTED RICE

Shaon Samanta Tanu; Purnendu Biswas; Sultan Ahmed; et al.

12
claims
26
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The experiment was conducted at Agronomy Field Laboratory of Patuakhali Science and Technology University, Dumki, Patuakhali, Bangladesh from July 2018 to November 2018 to find out the effect of sunflower residues and herbicides on weed control and yield of T. Aman rice. Weed control methods tested were T1= weedy check,T2 = Weed free check, T3 = Pendimethalin,T4 = Pretilachlor,T5= Butachlor,T6 = Pyrazosulfuron ethyl,T7 = Bensulfuron methyl + Acetachlor,T8 = Bispyriback sodium,T9 =2,4-D amine,T10 =MCPA,T11 = Sunflower residues ,T12 = Sunflower residues + 100%Pyrazosulfuron ethyl,T13 = Sunflower residues + 75%Pyrazosulfuron ethyl,T14 = Sunflower residues + 50%Pyrazosulfuron ethyl. The weed spectrum of the experimental field consisted of all the three groups of weeds viz., grasses (15.78%), sedges (59.02%) and broad-leaved weeds (25.2%). The dominants weeds were Cynodon dactylonand Echinochloa crusgalli among grasses; Cyperus difformis, Fimbristylis miliacea and Scirpus supinus among sedges and Jussiaea decurrens among broad-leaved weeds. Hand weeding recorded the highest weed control efficiency (99.05%) and weedy check recorded the lowest. Among different herbicides applied alone, butachlor had the highest weed control efficiency (87.59%).Hand weeding produced the highest grain yield (5.14 t ha-1) which was statistically similar to butachlor, pendimethalin, pretilachlor, bensulfuron methyl + acetachlor and sunflower residues + 100% pyrazosulfuronethyl. Application of sunflower residues along with the reduced rate (75 or 50%) of pyrazosulfuron ethyl had effective weed control and satisfactory yield comparable to butachlor. The farmers can use this technology as an eco-friendly approach in transplanted Aman rice field.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The field weed spectrum was 15.78% grasses.

Taxon
TRANSPLANTED RICEt0
Interactor
grassese0weed
Outcome
grassese0
Value
15.78%e0

Verbatim

e0

“grasses (15.78%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–797 · show in text ↑
t0

“TRANSPLANTED RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The field weed spectrum was 59.02% sedges.

Taxon
TRANSPLANTED RICEt0
Interactor
sedgesCarexe0weed
Outcome
sedgese0
Value
59.02%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carex
Carex · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sedges (59.02%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–814 · show in text ↑
t0

“TRANSPLANTED RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The field weed spectrum was 25.2% broad-leaved weeds.

Taxon
TRANSPLANTED RICEt0
Interactor
broad-leaved weedse0weed
Outcome
broad-leaved weedse0
Value
25.2%e0

Verbatim

e0

“broad-leaved weeds (25.2%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–845 · show in text ↑
t0

“TRANSPLANTED RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cynodon dactylonand Echinochloa crusgalli were dominant grasses.

Taxon
TRANSPLANTED RICEt0
Interactor
Cynodon dactylonand Echinochloa crusgalliEchinochloa crus-gallie0weed
Outcome
dominants weedse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Echinochloa crus-galli
Echinochloa crus-galli · InteractorMichael Becker · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The dominants weeds were Cynodon dactylonand Echinochloa crusgalli among grasses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–927 · show in text ↑
t0

“TRANSPLANTED RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cyperus difformis, Fimbristylis miliacea and Scirpus supinus were dominant sedges.

Taxon
TRANSPLANTED RICEt0
Interactor
Cyperus difformis, Fimbristylis miliacea and Scirpus supinusFimbristylis quinquangularisCyperus difformisSchoenoplectiella supinae0weede1
Outcome
dominants weedse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fimbristylis quinquangularis
Fimbristylis quinquangularis · InteractorRison Thumboor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cyperus difformis
Cyperus difformis · InteractorMargaretRDonald · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cyperus difformis, Fimbristylis miliacea and Scirpus supinus among sedges”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–1002 · show in text ↑
t0

“TRANSPLANTED RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–87 · show in text ↑
e1

“The dominants weeds were”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–871 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Jussiaea decurrens was a dominant broad-leaved weed.

Taxon
TRANSPLANTED RICEt0
Interactor
Jussiaea decurrense0weede1
Outcome
dominants weedse1

Verbatim

e0

“Jussiaea decurrens among broad-leaved weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1050 · show in text ↑
t0

“TRANSPLANTED RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–87 · show in text ↑
e1

“The dominants weeds were”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–871 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand weeding gave the highest weed control efficiency, 99.05%.

Taxon
TRANSPLANTED RICEt0
Treatment
Hand weedinge0
Outcome
weed control efficiencye0
Direction
higheste0
Value
99.05%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Hand weeding recorded the highest weed control efficiency (99.05%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1118 · show in text ↑
t0

“TRANSPLANTED RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The weedy check had the lowest weed control efficiency.

Taxon
TRANSPLANTED RICEt0
Treatment
weedy checke0
Outcome
weed control efficiencye1
Direction
loweste0

Verbatim

e0

“weedy check recorded the lowest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1123–1154 · show in text ↑
t0

“TRANSPLANTED RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–87 · show in text ↑
e1

“Hand weeding recorded the highest weed control efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Butachlor gave the highest efficiency among herbicides alone, 87.59%.

Taxon
TRANSPLANTED RICEt0
Treatment
butachlore0
Outcome
weed control efficiencye0
Direction
higheste0
Value
87.59%e0
Comparator
different herbicides applied alonee0

Verbatim

e0

“Among different herbicides applied alone, butachlor had the highest weed control efficiency (87.59%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1256 · show in text ↑
t0

“TRANSPLANTED RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand weeding produced the highest grain yield, 5.14 t ha-1, statistically similar to several other treatments.

Taxon
TRANSPLANTED RICEt0
Treatment
Hand weedinge0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
5.14 t ha-1e0
Comparator
butachlor, pendimethalin, pretilachlor, bensulfuron methyl + acetachlor and sunflower residues + 100% pyrazosulfuronethyle0

Verbatim

e0

“Hand weeding produced the highest grain yield (5.14 t ha-1) which was statistically similar to butachlor, pendimethalin, pretilachlor, bensulfuron methyl + acetachlor and sunflower residues + 100% pyrazosulfuronethyl”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1257–1473 · show in text ↑
t0

“TRANSPLANTED RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sunflower residues with reduced pyrazosulfuron ethyl gave effective weed control and satisfactory yield comparable to butachlor.

Taxon
TRANSPLANTED RICEt0
Treatment
sunflower residues along with the reduced rate (75 or 50%) of pyrazosulfuron ethyle0
Outcome
weed control and satisfactory yielde0
Direction
comparablee0
Comparator
butachlore0

Verbatim

e0

“Application of sunflower residues along with the reduced rate (75 or 50%) of pyrazosulfuron ethyl had effective weed control and satisfactory yield comparable to butachlor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1475–1646 · show in text ↑
t0

“TRANSPLANTED RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–87 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend the residue and reduced-herbicide technology in transplanted Aman rice.

Taxon
transplanted Aman ricee0
Outcome
use this technology as an eco-friendly approache0

Verbatim

e0

“The farmers can use this technology as an eco-friendly approach in transplanted Aman rice field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1648–1743 · show in text ↑

butachlor · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

97 papers: 90 positive, 7 negative or no effect

89 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

93 papers more in this group

See all 97 papers →

Pyrazosulfuron-ethyl · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

66 papers: 65 positive, 1 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

herbicide · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

603 papers: 579 positive, 24 negative or no effect

578 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

599 papers more in this group

See all 603 papers →

herbicide · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

802 papers: 725 positive, 77 negative or no effect

724 papers in the same direction as this paper · 57 in the opposite direction · 20 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

798 papers more in this group

See all 802 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.