Paper · 2019 · Misr journal of agricultural engineering

USING DEHYDRATED AIR IN DRYING GARLIC SLICES

A. T. Taha; H. S. Farouk

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate a new drying method that depend on absorbing the moisture from the air using some desiccants which have a great affinity for moisture; so when the wet air passes through the desiccants it becomes less wet and its temperature becomes a little higher ranging from 2 to 4°C. The used desiccants were sulfuric acid conc., calcium chloride anhydrous and silica gel. The experiments were done in two stages the first stage was without drying load on purpose of choosing the best treatment that provides high dehydrated air. The best treatment for dehydrating the air was when air passes with the lowest velocity 2.0 m/s in succession through four desiccants; 500ml H2SO4, 500g CaCl2, 500ml H2SO4 and 500g SiO2, with moisture uptake percentage from 56.77% to 18.2%. In the second stage we used oven dryer at 70 °C and Desiccant Drying System (DDS) with the best treatment in drying garlic with slices thickness 3 mm. Three levels of loading were used 1.15, 2.3 and 4‏.6 Kg/m². The quality of the dried garlic slices were evaluated for color and oil content. The results revealed that using the DDS method provides a good quality dehydrated garlic slices with higher oil content and lower color change. It also involved low energy consumption and high drying efficiency compared to the slices dried by using oven dryer.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Air passed at 2.0 m/s through four desiccants was the best air-dehydration treatment and reduced moisture from 56.77% to 18.2%.

Treatment
lowest velocity 2.0 m/se0
Outcome
moisture uptake percentagee0
Value
from 56.77% to 18.2%e0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The best treatment for dehydrating the air was when air passes with the lowest velocity 2.0 m/s in succession through four desiccants; 500ml H2SO4, 500g CaCl2, 500ml H2SO4 and 500g SiO2, with moisture uptake percentage from 56.77% to 18.2%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–797 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Desiccant drying yielded garlic slices with higher oil content than oven drying.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativume0
Treatment
DDS methode0
Outcome
oil contente0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
oven dryere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“using the DDS method provides a good quality dehydrated garlic slices with higher oil content and lower color change”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1117–1233 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared to the slices dried by using oven dryer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1302–1350 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Desiccant drying yielded garlic slices with less color change than oven drying.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativume0
Treatment
DDS methode0
Outcome
color changee0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
oven dryere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“using the DDS method provides a good quality dehydrated garlic slices with higher oil content and lower color change”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1117–1233 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared to the slices dried by using oven dryer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1302–1350 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Desiccant drying consumed less energy than oven drying.

Taxon
GARLICAllium sativumt0
Outcome
energy consumptione0
Direction
lowe0
Comparator
oven dryere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It also involved low energy consumption and high drying efficiency compared to the slices dried by using oven dryer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1235–1350 · show in text ↑
t0

“GARLIC SLICES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–44 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Desiccant drying had higher efficiency than oven drying.

Taxon
GARLICAllium sativumt0
Outcome
drying efficiencye0
Direction
highe0
Comparator
oven dryere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It also involved low energy consumption and high drying efficiency compared to the slices dried by using oven dryer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1235–1350 · show in text ↑
t0

“GARLIC SLICES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–44 · show in text ↑

processing · quality: postharvest · Allium sativum (garlic)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

processing · quality: oil · Allium sativum (garlic)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.