Paper · 2014 · Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association

An evaluation of lucerne for persistence under grazing in New Zealand

B.M. Harvey; K.H. Widdup; B.A. Barrett

9
claims
16
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Abstract The on-farm use of lucerne (Medicago sativa) for grazing and conserved feed has increased in New Zealand over recent years, with new cultivars coming onto the market, including more winter-active ones. The extent to which the winter active types contribute to annual feed production, and the relationship to critical traits like persistence, has not been systematically tested. Two concurrent trials over a 4-year period were used to evaluate a range of lucerne cultivars and elite experimental populations ranging in dormancy from 2 (highly dormant) to 10 (non-dormant) under contrasting grazing regimes near Lincoln, New Zealand. More winter-active cultivars in the higher fall dormancy (FD) classes had similar growth to lower FD classes in all seasons except autumn, where they exhibited 18% greater yield than the lowest FD entry. However, these higher FD populations do not persist as well under heavy grazing, with a reduction in ground cover of up to 90% after four years, compared with only a 25% loss in lower FD classes. There was a negative correlation between FD and persistence measured as plant survival over 4 years (R2=0.73). However, one high FD entry showed increased survival under grazing, suggesting there is scope for selection of types with improved cool season growth and grazing tolerance. The concurrent lucerne trial subjected to a low-frequency grazing/ cutting regime showed faster recovery from defoliation than the adjacent hard grazed regime, suggesting stored underground reserves were more available for regrowth. We concluded that lucerne cultivars with FD ratings in the 3 to 5 range are most suitable for yield and persistence under grazing in these conditions. There is also scope for breeding to improve plant survival and dry matter yield within FD class. Keywords: Lucerne (Medicago sativa), grazing tolerance, persistence, fall dormancy

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher fall dormancy winter-active lucerne had growth similar to lower fall dormancy classes in all seasons except autumn.

Taxon
lucerneMedicago sativae0
Material
winter-active cultivars in the higher fall dormancy (FD) classese1
Outcome
growthe1
Direction
similare1
Qualifier
in all seasons except autumne1
Comparator
lower FD classese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The on-farm use of lucerne (Medicago sativa) for grazing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–65 · show in text ↑
e1

“More winter-active cultivars in the higher fall dormancy (FD) classes had similar growth to lower FD classes in all seasons except autumn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 641–778 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In autumn, higher fall dormancy lucerne yielded 18% more than the lowest fall dormancy entry.

Taxon
lucerneMedicago sativae0
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
greatere2
Value
18%e2
Comparator
lowest FD entrye2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The on-farm use of lucerne (Medicago sativa) for grazing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–65 · show in text ↑
e2

“where they exhibited 18% greater yield than the lowest FD entry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–843 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher FD lucerne populations lost up to 90% ground cover after four years of heavy grazing, compared with a 25% loss in lower FD classes.

Taxon
lucerneMedicago sativae0
Material
higher FD populationse3
Treatment
heavy grazinge3
Outcome
ground covere3
Direction
reductione3
Value
up to 90%e3
Qualifier
after four yearse3
Comparator
lower FD classese3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The on-farm use of lucerne (Medicago sativa) for grazing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–65 · show in text ↑
e3

“these higher FD populations do not persist as well under heavy grazing, with a reduction in ground cover of up to 90% after four years, compared with only a 25% loss in lower FD classes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–1039 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FD and lucerne persistence, measured as plant survival over 4 years, were negatively correlated (R2=0.73).

Taxon
lucerneMedicago sativae0
Material
FDe4
Outcome
plant survivale4
Direction
negative correlatione4
Value
R2=0.73e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The on-farm use of lucerne (Medicago sativa) for grazing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–65 · show in text ↑
e4

“There was a negative correlation between FD and persistence measured as plant survival over 4 years (R2=0.73)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1150 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One high fall dormancy lucerne entry showed increased survival under grazing.

Taxon
lucerneMedicago sativae0
Material
one high FD entrye5
Outcome
survival under grazinge5
Direction
increasede5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The on-farm use of lucerne (Medicago sativa) for grazing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–65 · show in text ↑
e5

“However, one high FD entry showed increased survival under grazing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1152–1218 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Lucerne cultivars with FD ratings in the 3 to 5 range are most suitable for yield and persistence under grazing in these conditions.

Taxon
lucerneMedicago sativae6
Material
cultivars with FD ratings in the 3 to 5 rangee6
Outcome
yield and persistence under grazinge6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e6

“We concluded that lucerne cultivars with FD ratings in the 3 to 5 range are most suitable for yield and persistence under grazing in these conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1558–1707 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

There is scope for breeding lucerne to improve plant survival and dry matter yield within FD class.

Taxon
lucerneMedicago sativae0
Outcome
plant survival and dry matter yielde7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The on-farm use of lucerne (Medicago sativa) for grazing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–65 · show in text ↑
e7

“There is also scope for breeding to improve plant survival and dry matter yield within FD class”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1709–1804 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Stored underground reserves were more available for lucerne regrowth after defoliation, as a suggested explanation.

Taxon
lucerneMedicago sativae0
Outcome
regrowthe1
Qualifier
stored underground reserves were more availablee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The on-farm use of lucerne (Medicago sativa) for grazing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–65 · show in text ↑
e1

“suggesting stored underground reserves were more available for regrowth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1485–1556 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low-frequency grazing/cutting showed faster lucerne recovery from defoliation than adjacent hard grazing.

Taxon
lucerneMedicago sativae2
Treatment
low-frequency grazing/ cutting regimee2
Outcome
recovery from defoliatione2
Direction
fastere2
Comparator
adjacent hard grazed regimee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e2

“The concurrent lucerne trial subjected to a low-frequency grazing/ cutting regime showed faster recovery from defoliation than the adjacent hard grazed regime”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1325–1483 · show in text ↑

grazing · pest · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results differ

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

pruning · pest · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 7 positive, 5 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.