Paper · 2020 · Peanut Science

Peanut and Weed Response to Postemergence Herbicide Tank-Mixtures Including Paraquat and Inorganic Liquid Nutrients

K.M. Eason; T.L Grey; R.S. Tubbs; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT Weed control is an integral part of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) production systems. Paraquat is a staple postemergence (POST) herbicide used in peanut production in the Southeast US. Inorganic liquid nutrient (ILN) concentrates are liquid fertilizers that are recommended for use by producers in tank-mixtures with paraquat by some distributors. Irrigated and non-irrigated field trials were conducted to quantify the safening effect of ILN in various herbicide tank-mixtures on peanut and determine the suitability as tank-mix replacements for bentazon. Field studies indicated similar POST herbicide responses for peanut injury. Greenhouse experiments evaluated POST paraquat tank-mixtures with ILN for weed control and biomass reduction. Paraquat plus S-metolachlor caused significant leaf burn and stunting. Greatest peanut foliar injury occurred 3 d after treatment (DAT) but was transient. For the irrigated field trial, paraquat plus S-metolachlor plus ILN had similar injury levels as compared to paraquat plus S-metolachlor plus acifluorfen plus bentazon at 22 to 25%. For the non-irrigated field study, the application of paraquat plus ILN had 10% injury compared to paraquat at 22%. While injury was the greatest directly following application, peanut was able to recover with no yield or grade loss for both the irrigated and non-irrigated studies. In the greenhouse study, the effect of ILN varied by weed species and reduced leaf injury on several broadleaf weeds. While the addition of ILN to the various paraquat tank-mixtures initially reduced injury, it did not correspond to increases in yield or grade. The variability in weed control, transient injury mitigation, and no yield increase indicates that Georgia peanut growers will receive no benefit for including ILN in their paraquat tank-mixtures but if needed to improve crop nutrition, ILN will not reduce weed control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field studies indicated similar POST herbicide responses for peanut injury.

Treatment
POST herbicidee0
Outcome
peanut injurye0
Direction
no_changeinferrede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
e0

“Field studies indicated similar POST herbicide responses for peanut injury”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–639 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greatest peanut foliar injury occurred 3 days after treatment but was transient.

Outcome
peanut foliar injurye1
Qualifier
transiente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
e1

“Paraquat plus S-metolachlor caused significant leaf burn and stunting. Greatest peanut foliar injury occurred 3 d after treatment (DAT) but was transient”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–904 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Paraquat plus S-metolachlor caused significant leaf burn and stunting of peanut.

Treatment
Paraquat plus S-metolachlore1
Outcome
leaf burn and stuntinge1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
e1

“Paraquat plus S-metolachlor caused significant leaf burn and stunting. Greatest peanut foliar injury occurred 3 d after treatment (DAT) but was transient”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–904 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the irrigated field trial, paraquat plus S-metolachlor plus ILN had similar peanut injury levels to paraquat plus S-metolachlor plus acifluorfen plus bentazon at 22 to 25%.

Treatment
paraquat plus S-metolachlor plus ILNe2
Outcome
injury levelse2
Direction
no_changeinferrede2
Value
22 to 25%e2
Comparator
paraquat plus S-metolachlor plus acifluorfen plus bentazone2
Setting
irrigated field triale2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
e2

“For the irrigated field trial, paraquat plus S-metolachlor plus ILN had similar injury levels as compared to paraquat plus S-metolachlor plus acifluorfen plus bentazon at 22 to 25%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–1086 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the non-irrigated field study, paraquat plus ILN had 10% peanut injury compared with 22% for paraquat.

Treatment
paraquat plus ILNe3
Outcome
injurye3
Direction
lowerinferrede3
Value
10%e3
Comparator
paraquate3
Setting
non-irrigated field studye3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
e3

“For the non-irrigated field study, the application of paraquat plus ILN had 10% injury compared to paraquat at 22%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1088–1202 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peanut recovered with no yield or grade loss in both the irrigated and non-irrigated studies.

Outcome
yield or grade losse4
Qualifier
recovere4
Setting
irrigated and non-irrigated studiese4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
e4

“While injury was the greatest directly following application, peanut was able to recover with no yield or grade loss for both the irrigated and non-irrigated studies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1204–1369 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the greenhouse study, ILN reduced leaf injury on several broadleaf weeds, and its effect varied by weed species.

Treatment
ILNe5
Interactor
broadleaf weedse5weed
Outcome
leaf injury on several broadleaf weedse5
Direction
reducede5
Qualifier
varied by weed speciese5
Setting
greenhouse studye5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
e5

“In the greenhouse study, the effect of ILN varied by weed species and reduced leaf injury on several broadleaf weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1371–1487 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding ILN to paraquat tank-mixtures initially reduced peanut injury.

Treatment
addition of ILN to the various paraquat tank-mixturese6
Outcome
injurye6
Direction
reducede6
Qualifier
initiallye6
Comparator
paraquat tank-mixturese6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
e6

“While the addition of ILN to the various paraquat tank-mixtures initially reduced injury, it did not correspond to increases in yield or grade”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1489–1631 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding ILN to paraquat tank-mixtures did not increase peanut yield or grade.

Treatment
addition of ILN to the various paraquat tank-mixturese6
Outcome
yield or gradee6
Direction
did not correspond to increasese6
Comparator
paraquat tank-mixturese6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
e6

“While the addition of ILN to the various paraquat tank-mixtures initially reduced injury, it did not correspond to increases in yield or grade”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1489–1631 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultno effectbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Georgia peanut growers will receive no benefit from including ILN in their paraquat tank-mixtures.

Outcome
benefite7
Setting
Georgiae7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
e7

“Georgia peanut growers will receive no benefit for including ILN in their paraquat tank-mixtures but if needed to improve crop nutrition, ILN will not reduce weed control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1732–1902 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ILN will not reduce weed control when it is needed to improve crop nutrition.

Treatment
ILNe7
Interactor
weede7weed
Outcome
weed controle7
Qualifier
if needed to improve crop nutritione7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
e7

“Georgia peanut growers will receive no benefit for including ILN in their paraquat tank-mixtures but if needed to improve crop nutrition, ILN will not reduce weed control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1732–1902 · show in text ↑

paraquat · crop injury · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 3 positive, 6 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

paraquat · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 8 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

herbicide · crop injury · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 4 positive, 23 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.