Abstract
Investigating the effect of urea and nano-nitrogen fertigation and foliar application of nano B and Mo on growth and yield of potato Solanum tuberosum L. [Rivera-A]. The study was conducted in a private farm located in the Al-Taleah area - Babylon governorate. The experiment consisted of (12) treatments consisting of separated fertigation of nano nitrogen (25% N) and urea (46% N), single treatments of leaf spraying of nano Mo (5%), Nano B (9%), nano-binary combinations (Mo+B) and (U+ Nano Mo), (U+Nano B), Nano (N+Mo), Nano (N+B), and tricombination treatments of (U+Mo+B), Nano (N+Mo+B) additional to the control treatment. Randomize Complete Block Design (RCBD) and one way simple experiment with three replicates. Fertilizers were applied at levels of 40 liters h-1 of Nano-N fertilizer (25% N) and 300 kg h-1 urea fertilizer (46% N). They were sprayed early in the morning after (40) days after planting four times. Two weeks is the period between an application and another according to the recommendation of (1) kg h-1 nano-fertilizer of (B) and (500) g h-1 of Mo. Fertilizers were injected and sprayed at (10, 20, 30 and 40)% of the total amount of the fertilizer were applied as the first, second, third and fourth applications, respectively. Some growth traits were tested including the chlorophyll content in the leaves, the total dry vegetative yild, the soft tubers yield, and the biological yield, proteins and ascorbic acid yield compared to the control (spray water only). The results of the Duncan test showed a significant increase in most of the studied traits of nano-tricombination (N+Mo+B) in the fresh tubers yield, dry vegetative yield , the biological yield, starch yield ,the total protein and ascorbic yield (37.53, 1.799, 8.138,4.152 , 481.3and 653.8 meg ha-1) respectively .compare to control (21.58 , 0.890, 4.463 ,2.323 , 366.1 and 215.5 meg ha-1) respectively.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Nano-tricombination (N+Mo+B) significantly increased fresh tuber yield of potato to 37.53 meg ha-1 versus 21.58 meg ha-1 in the control.
- Taxon
- Potato
Solanum tuberosumt0 - Treatment
- nano-tricombination (N+Mo+B)e0
- Outcome
- fresh tubers yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 37.53e0
- Qualifier
- 21.58e1
- Comparator
- controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Potato”
e0“significant increase in most of the studied traits of nano-tricombination (N+Mo+B) in the fresh tubers yield, dry vegetative yield , the biological yield, starch yield ,the total protein and ascorbic yield (37.53, 1.799, 8.138,4.152 , 481.3and 653.8 meg ha-1) respectively”
e1“compare to control (21.58 , 0.890, 4.463 ,2.323 , 366.1 and 215.5 meg ha-1) respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Nano-tricombination (N+Mo+B) significantly increased dry vegetative yield of potato to 1.799 meg ha-1 versus 0.890 meg ha-1 in the control.
- Taxon
- PotatoSolanum tuberosumt0
- Treatment
- nano-tricombination (N+Mo+B)e0
- Outcome
- dry vegetative yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 1.799e0
- Qualifier
- 0.890e1
- Comparator
- controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Potato”
e0“significant increase in most of the studied traits of nano-tricombination (N+Mo+B) in the fresh tubers yield, dry vegetative yield , the biological yield, starch yield ,the total protein and ascorbic yield (37.53, 1.799, 8.138,4.152 , 481.3and 653.8 meg ha-1) respectively”
e1“compare to control (21.58 , 0.890, 4.463 ,2.323 , 366.1 and 215.5 meg ha-1) respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Nano-tricombination (N+Mo+B) significantly increased biological yield of potato to 8.138 meg ha-1 versus 4.463 meg ha-1 in the control.
- Taxon
- PotatoSolanum tuberosumt0
- Treatment
- nano-tricombination (N+Mo+B)e0
- Outcome
- biological yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 8.138e0
- Qualifier
- 4.463e1
- Comparator
- controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Potato”
e0“significant increase in most of the studied traits of nano-tricombination (N+Mo+B) in the fresh tubers yield, dry vegetative yield , the biological yield, starch yield ,the total protein and ascorbic yield (37.53, 1.799, 8.138,4.152 , 481.3and 653.8 meg ha-1) respectively”
e1“compare to control (21.58 , 0.890, 4.463 ,2.323 , 366.1 and 215.5 meg ha-1) respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Nano-tricombination (N+Mo+B) significantly increased starch yield of potato to 4.152 meg ha-1 versus 2.323 meg ha-1 in the control.
- Taxon
- PotatoSolanum tuberosumt0
- Treatment
- nano-tricombination (N+Mo+B)e0
- Outcome
- starch yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 4.152e0
- Qualifier
- 2.323e1
- Comparator
- controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Potato”
e0“significant increase in most of the studied traits of nano-tricombination (N+Mo+B) in the fresh tubers yield, dry vegetative yield , the biological yield, starch yield ,the total protein and ascorbic yield (37.53, 1.799, 8.138,4.152 , 481.3and 653.8 meg ha-1) respectively”
e1“compare to control (21.58 , 0.890, 4.463 ,2.323 , 366.1 and 215.5 meg ha-1) respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Nano-tricombination (N+Mo+B) significantly increased total protein yield of potato to 481.3 meg ha-1 versus 366.1 meg ha-1 in the control.
- Taxon
- PotatoSolanum tuberosumt0
- Treatment
- nano-tricombination (N+Mo+B)e0
- Outcome
- total proteine0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 481.3e0
- Qualifier
- 366.1e1
- Comparator
- controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Potato”
e0“significant increase in most of the studied traits of nano-tricombination (N+Mo+B) in the fresh tubers yield, dry vegetative yield , the biological yield, starch yield ,the total protein and ascorbic yield (37.53, 1.799, 8.138,4.152 , 481.3and 653.8 meg ha-1) respectively”
e1“compare to control (21.58 , 0.890, 4.463 ,2.323 , 366.1 and 215.5 meg ha-1) respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Nano-tricombination (N+Mo+B) significantly increased ascorbic acid yield of potato to 653.8 meg ha-1 versus 215.5 meg ha-1 in the control.
- Taxon
- PotatoSolanum tuberosumt0
- Treatment
- nano-tricombination (N+Mo+B)e0
- Outcome
- ascorbic yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 653.8e0
- Qualifier
- 215.5e1
- Comparator
- controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Potato”
e0“significant increase in most of the studied traits of nano-tricombination (N+Mo+B) in the fresh tubers yield, dry vegetative yield , the biological yield, starch yield ,the total protein and ascorbic yield (37.53, 1.799, 8.138,4.152 , 481.3and 653.8 meg ha-1) respectively”
e1“compare to control (21.58 , 0.890, 4.463 ,2.323 , 366.1 and 215.5 meg ha-1) respectively”
The same questions in other papers
molybdenum atom · quality: sugar starch · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
molybdenum atom · quality: protein · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
molybdenum atom · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →nanoparticle · quality: sugar starch · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →nanoparticle · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results
32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- positive
31 papers more in this group
See all 35 papers →nanoparticle · quality: protein · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.