Paper · 2020 · Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology

Characterization of Pigeonpea Genotypes for Waterlogging Tolerance Based on Morpho-physiological and Molecular Traits

Deepak Kumar; Rafat Sultana; Ravi Ranjan Kumar; et al.

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Aim: To screen and characterize pigeonpea genotypes using morpho-physiological, biochemical and molecular traits. Study Design: The field trial was conducted using the Randomized Block Design (RBD) while Completely Randomized Design was used for laboratory and pot screening experiments. Place and Duration of Study: The research trial was conducted at Laboratory and Pulse Research Farm, Model Bhitti, BAU, Sabour, which lies between 25°15’40” N latitude to 87°2’42” E longitude and 46 meters above sea level. Study was undertaken between July, 2018 to March, 2019. Methodology: Sixty pigeonpea genotypes were screened for submergence tolerance at seed stage in the laboratory. Based on results of laboratory screening, 40 genotypes with sufficient genotypic variability for waterlogging tolerance were further taken for seedling stage screening at field, finally 20 genotypes were taken to pots for waterlogging tolerance evaluation and characterization on the basis of morpho-physiological, biochemical and molecular traits. According to pot results, six contrasting genotypes were considered for RAPD primers amplification. Results: The three levels of sieving of genotypes fetched results directing the opportunity of particular genotypes to be sown inlow land areas. Character like seed colour varied from brown, dark brown to black, which showed significant relationship with level of tolerance. Significant (p=0.01) higher germination with less reduction due to waterlogging stress was observed in genotypes such as ICP-11809, ICPL-20098, NDA-1 and ICP-5028. Maximum survival percent was found in ICP-5028 (62.28%) while least survival percent was observed in ICP-7035 (10.98%). At the field stage, genotypes such as ICP-5028, ICPL-990985, ICPL-20238 were best performing genotypes. SPAD Chlorophyll Content results exhibited significant reduction among the susceptible genotypes. However, there was least reduction among tolerant genotypes such as LRG-30, Mal-9, Pusa-992 and ICP-5028.Genotypes namely: Manak, Pusa-991 and Pusa-992 faced hastened senescence under waterlogging condition as compared to ICP-5028, Mal-15, Mal-9, LRG-30. Molecular evaluation results of six genotypes chosen across screening showed that ICP-7035 and Manak were clubed together in one cluster. Nevertheless, ICP-5028 and Mal-9 were grouped in another cluster of Dendrogram, constructed using Jaccard similarity coefficient. In the present investigation two unique amplicons were amplified by primers OPA-13 and OPC-01. OPA-13 amplified unique band was linked with susceptible genotypes of size ~1240 bp while the unique amplicon given by OPC-01 was of ~980 bp size linked with tolerant genotypes. Conclusion: Available waterlogging tolerance in pigeonpea gene pool to some extent can provide source for breeding waterlogging tolerant cultivars. Physiological and genetic approach involving efficient screening techniques and evaluation of breeding material/lines under targeted environment for the traits linked to tolerance is likely to lead to the identification of specific component traits and high yielding varieties with improved stress tolerance.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed colour was significantly related to the level of waterlogging tolerance in pigeonpea.

Taxon
PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Organ / stage
seed coloure1
Outcome
level of tolerancee1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pigeonpea Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–39 · show in text ↑
e1

“Character like seed colour varied from brown, dark brown to black, which showed significant relationship with level of tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1273–1401 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Germination of ICP-11809, ICPL-20098, NDA-1 and ICP-5028 was significantly higher under waterlogging stress, with less reduction.

Taxon
PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Material
ICP-11809, ICPL-20098, NDA-1 and ICP-5028e2
Treatment
waterlogging stresse2
Outcome
germinatione2
Direction
highere2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pigeonpea Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–39 · show in text ↑
e2

“Significant (p=0.01) higher germination with less reduction due to waterlogging stress was observed in genotypes such as ICP-11809, ICPL-20098, NDA-1 and ICP-5028”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1403–1565 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype ICP-5028 had the maximum survival percent (62.28%) under waterlogging.

Taxon
PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Material
ICP-5028e3
Outcome
survival percente3
Value
62.28%e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pigeonpea Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–39 · show in text ↑
e3

“Maximum survival percent was found in ICP-5028 (62.28%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1567–1622 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype ICP-7035 had the least survival percent (10.98%) under waterlogging.

Taxon
PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Material
ICP-7035e4
Outcome
survival percente4
Value
10.98%e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pigeonpea Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–39 · show in text ↑
e4

“while least survival percent was observed in ICP-7035 (10.98%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1623–1685 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SPAD chlorophyll content showed significant reduction among the susceptible genotypes under waterlogging.

Taxon
PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Material
susceptible genotypese5
Outcome
SPAD Chlorophyll Contente5
Direction
reductione5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pigeonpea Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–39 · show in text ↑
e5

“SPAD Chlorophyll Content results exhibited significant reduction among the susceptible genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1791–1887 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SPAD chlorophyll content showed least reduction among tolerant genotypes LRG-30, Mal-9, Pusa-992 and ICP-5028.

Taxon
PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Material
tolerant genotypes such as LRG-30, Mal-9, Pusa-992 and ICP-5028e6
Outcome
SPAD Chlorophyll Contente6
Direction
least reductione6
Comparator
susceptible genotypese6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pigeonpea Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–39 · show in text ↑
e6

“SPAD Chlorophyll Content results exhibited significant reduction among the susceptible genotypes. However, there was least reduction among tolerant genotypes such as LRG-30, Mal-9, Pusa-992 and ICP-5028”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1791–1993 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manak, Pusa-991 and Pusa-992 showed hastened senescence under waterlogging compared with ICP-5028, Mal-15, Mal-9 and LRG-30.

Taxon
PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Material
Manak, Pusa-991 and Pusa-992e7
Treatment
waterlogging conditione7
Outcome
senescencee7
Direction
hastenede7
Comparator
ICP-5028, Mal-15, Mal-9, LRG-30e7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pigeonpea Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–39 · show in text ↑
e7

“Genotypes namely: Manak, Pusa-991 and Pusa-992 faced hastened senescence under waterlogging condition as compared to ICP-5028, Mal-15, Mal-9, LRG-30”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1994–2142 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ICP-7035 and Manak clustered together in one molecular cluster.

Taxon
PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Material
ICP-7035 and Manake1
Outcome
clubed together in one clustere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pigeonpea Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–39 · show in text ↑
e1

“ICP-7035 and Manak were clubed together in one cluster”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2226–2280 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ICP-5028 and Mal-9 grouped in another cluster of the dendrogram.

Taxon
PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Material
ICP-5028 and Mal-9e1
Outcome
grouped in another clustere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pigeonpea Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–39 · show in text ↑
e1

“ICP-5028 and Mal-9 were grouped in another cluster of Dendrogram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2296–2360 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Primer OPA-13 amplified a unique band of about 1240 bp linked with susceptible genotypes.

Taxon
PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Material
susceptible genotypese1
Outcome
OPA-13 amplified unique bande1
Value
~1240 bpe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pigeonpea Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–39 · show in text ↑
e1

“OPA-13 amplified unique band was linked with susceptible genotypes of size ~1240 bp”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2507–2590 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The unique amplicon of primer OPC-01 of about 980 bp was linked with tolerant genotypes.

Taxon
PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Material
tolerant genotypese1
Outcome
unique amplicon given by OPC-01e1
Value
~980 bpe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pigeonpea Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–39 · show in text ↑
e1

“the unique amplicon given by OPC-01 was of ~980 bp size linked with tolerant genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2597–2683 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Pigeonpea gene pool can provide a source for breeding waterlogging-tolerant cultivars.

Taxon
PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Outcome
source for breeding waterlogging tolerant cultivarse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pigeonpea Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–39 · show in text ↑
e1

“Available waterlogging tolerance in pigeonpea gene pool to some extent can provide source for breeding waterlogging tolerant cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2697–2831 · show in text ↑

flooding · growth · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.