Paper · 2020 · Agrarian Bulletin of the

Influence of various elements of cultivation technology on the chlorophyll content in winter wheat plants and its yield

Elena Shestakova; F EROShENKO; I. STORCHAK; et al.

20
claims
40
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Abstract. The chlorophyll content is the most important factor that determines the intensity of photosynthesis and the overall biological productivity of plants. Therefore, the search for mechanisms that allow you to manage the production process is an important task, the solution of which will allow you to improve the technological methods of growing crops to obtain high yields. The purpose of the study is to determine the influence of various elements of cultivation technology on the chlorophyll content in plants and the yield of winter wheat. Methods. The objects of research were winter wheat crops of various varieties. The chlorophyll content was determined by the method of Ya. I. Milaeva and N. P. Primak. Crop accounting was performed using the combine method. Results. The relative chlorophyll content in winter wheat plants: lea predecessor on average 9,4 % higher than for cereals; the use of mineral fertilizers in a few increased this figure by 38,0 %, wheat ‒ 14,0 %; in the later sowing time the amount of green pigments in plants on average more than early and optimum of 10,5 and 4,0 %, respectively; in more thickened crops, the chlorophyll content in plants is lower than in sparse ones (by 13,0 %). The absolute chlorophyll content (g/m2) in winter wheat plants: in a few in an average of 45,0 % higher than for cereals; the use of mineral fertilizers in a few increased this figure at 73,4 %, for winter wheat ‒ 76,8 %; number of green pigments in plants at the optimum sowing time is on average higher than in the early (29,6 %) and late (15,2 %); at the optimal seeding rate accumulates more chlorophyll than the minimum (by 33,4 %) and the maximum (24,2 %). On average, for all cultivation technologies, the variety Stat' contains the largest amount of chlorophyll in plants, and Zustrich – the smallest. The yield of winter wheat for the lea precursor was 4,9 t/ha, for winter wheat – 3,3 t/ha. Use of mineral fertilizers on couple increased this indicator on average by 44,1 %, and on the cereal predecessor ‒ by 55,3 %. At the optimal time of sowing, the highest yield was formed, and on average it was 5,1 t/ha for varieties. seeding Rates did not have provable differences on the yield of winter wheat. The highest yield was obtained in the Rate variety on the predecessor of pairs on a fertilized background – 7,5 t/ha. Scientific novelty. The features of the influence of various precursors, the level of mineral nutrition, timing and seeding rates on the content of chlorophyll in plants and the yield of winter wheat crops of new varieties of selection of the North Caucasian FSAC were revealed. The correlation between the relative and absolute content of chlorophyll in winter wheat plants and its yield for these varieties in the zone of unstable moisture in the Stavropol territory was determined.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative chlorophyll was 9.4% higher after the lea predecessor than cereals.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
lea predecessore0
Outcome
9,4 %e0
Direction
highere0
Value
9,4 %e0
Comparator
cerealse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lea predecessor on average 9,4 % higher than for cereals”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–898 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral fertilizers increased relative chlorophyll in the lea predecessor by 38.0%.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
mineral fertilizerse0
Outcome
chlorophyll contentt0
Direction
increasede0
Value
38,0 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the use of mineral fertilizers in a few increased this figure by 38,0 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–971 · show in text ↑
t0

“chlorophyll content in winter wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral fertilizers increased relative chlorophyll in wheat by 14.0%.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
chlorophyll contentt0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
14,0 %e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat ‒ 14,0 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–987 · show in text ↑
t0

“chlorophyll content in winter wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late sowing raised green pigments 10.5% versus early sowing.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
later sowing timee0
Outcome
amount of green pigmentse0
Direction
moree0
Value
10,5e0
Comparator
earlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the later sowing time the amount of green pigments in plants on average more than early and optimum of 10,5 and 4,0 %, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1123 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late sowing raised green pigments 4.0% versus optimum sowing.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
later sowing timee0
Outcome
amount of green pigmentse0
Direction
moree0
Value
4,0 %e0
Comparator
optimume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the later sowing time the amount of green pigments in plants on average more than early and optimum of 10,5 and 4,0 %, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1123 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thickened crops had 13.0% lower chlorophyll than sparse crops.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
thickened cropse0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
lowere0
Value
13,0 %e0
Comparator
sparse onese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in more thickened crops, the chlorophyll content in plants is lower than in sparse ones (by 13,0 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1224 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Absolute chlorophyll was 45.0% higher after the lea predecessor than cereals.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
a fewe0
Outcome
chlorophyll contentt0
Direction
highere0
Value
45,0 %e0
Comparator
cerealse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in a few in an average of 45,0 % higher than for cereals”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1290–1346 · show in text ↑
t0

“chlorophyll content in winter wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral fertilizers increased absolute chlorophyll 73.4% for the lea predecessor.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
mineral fertilizerse0
Outcome
chlorophyll contentt0
Direction
increasede0
Value
73,4 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the use of mineral fertilizers in a few increased this figure at 73,4 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1348–1419 · show in text ↑
t0

“chlorophyll content in winter wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral fertilizers increased absolute chlorophyll 76.8% for winter wheat.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
chlorophyll contentt0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
76,8 %e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for winter wheat ‒ 76,8 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1421–1446 · show in text ↑
t0

“chlorophyll content in winter wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimal sowing had 29.6% more green pigments than early sowing.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
optimum sowing timee0
Outcome
number of green pigmentse0
Direction
highere0
Value
29,6 %e0
Comparator
earlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“number of green pigments in plants at the optimum sowing time is on average higher than in the early (29,6 %) and late (15,2 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1448–1575 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimal sowing had 15.2% more green pigments than late sowing.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
optimum sowing timee0
Outcome
number of green pigmentse0
Direction
highere0
Value
15,2 %e0
Comparator
latee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“number of green pigments in plants at the optimum sowing time is on average higher than in the early (29,6 %) and late (15,2 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1448–1575 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimal seeding rate accumulated 33.4% more chlorophyll than minimum rate.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
optimal seeding ratee0
Outcome
chlorophylle0
Direction
moree0
Value
33,4 %e0
Comparator
minimume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at the optimal seeding rate accumulates more chlorophyll than the minimum (by 33,4 %) and the maximum (24,2 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1577–1687 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimal seeding rate accumulated 24.2% more chlorophyll than maximum rate.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
optimal seeding ratee0
Outcome
chlorophylle0
Direction
moree0
Value
24,2 %e0
Comparator
maximume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at the optimal seeding rate accumulates more chlorophyll than the minimum (by 33,4 %) and the maximum (24,2 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1577–1687 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–98 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stat had the highest chlorophyll and Zustrich the lowest across technologies.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Stat'e0
Outcome
amount of chlorophylle0
Direction
largeste0
Comparator
Zustriche0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On average, for all cultivation technologies, the variety Stat' contains the largest amount of chlorophyll in plants, and Zustrich – the smallest.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1689–1835 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Winter wheat after the lea precursor yielded 4.9 t/ha versus 3.3 t/ha after winter wheat.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
lea precursore0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
4,9 t/hae0
Qualifier
3,3 t/hae0
Comparator
winter wheate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield of winter wheat for the lea precursor was 4,9 t/ha, for winter wheat – 3,3 t/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1836–1926 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral fertilizers raised yield by 44.1% on the lea predecessor.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
mineral fertilizerse0
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
increasede0
Value
44,1 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Use of mineral fertilizers on couple increased this indicator on average by 44,1 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1927–2009 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–98 · show in text ↑
e1

“The yield of winter wheat for the lea precursor was 4,9 t/ha, for winter wheat – 3,3 t/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1836–1926 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral fertilizers raised yield by 55.3% on the cereal predecessor.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt1
Outcome
yieldt0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
55,3 %e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on the cereal predecessor ‒ by 55,3 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2015–2052 · show in text ↑
t0

“yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–119 · show in text ↑
t1

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimal sowing produced the highest yield, averaging 5.1 t/ha.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
optimal time of sowinge0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
5,1 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the optimal time of sowing, the highest yield was formed, and on average it was 5,1 t/ha for varieties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2054–2160 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seeding rates did not show provable yield differences.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
seeding Ratese0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
did not have provable differencese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seeding Rates did not have provable differences on the yield of winter wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2161–2238 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rate variety had the highest yield of 7.5 t/ha after pairs on fertilized background.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Ratee0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
7,5 t/hae0
Qualifier
predecessor of pairs on a fertilized backgrounde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest yield was obtained in the Rate variety on the predecessor of pairs on a fertilized background – 7,5 t/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2239–2356 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–98 · show in text ↑

density · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

sowing time · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 5 positive, 11 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

134 papers: 123 positive, 11 negative or no effect

122 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

130 papers more in this group

See all 134 papers →

sowing time · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

462 papers: 266 positive, 196 negative or no effect

265 papers in the same direction as this paper · 191 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

458 papers more in this group

See all 462 papers →

density · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

498 papers: 376 positive, 122 negative or no effect

121 papers in the same direction as this paper · 376 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

494 papers more in this group

See all 498 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.