Paper · 2015 · Journal of Plant Physiology and Breeding

Effects of K/Ca ratios of Nutrient Solution on Some Physiological Traits and Cut Flower Vase Life of Rose Cultivars (Capitol and Magic Red)

Amin Javan Ouchbolagh; Saadollah Alizadeh Ajirlo; S J Tabatabaei; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

An experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of K/Ca ratios of nutrient solution on physiological traits, cut flower vase life and postharvest changes of rose. The main experiment was factorial based on completely randomized design with two cvs. of rose (Magic Red and Capitol), five K/Ca ratios in the nutrient solution (4:4, 6:4, 6:3, 8:3, 10:2) and three replications. Increasing the K/Ca ratio in the solution led to accumulation of K in the leaves but decreased the Ca concentration of the leaves. Furthermore, K/Ca ratio of the leaves was affected by K/Ca ratio of the nutrient solution and highest ratio of K/Ca was recorded for the leaves of plants fed with nutrient solution of 10:2 K/Ca ratio and the lowest K/Ca ratio of leaves was observed for plants which supplied with the nutrient solutions of 4:4 and 6:4 K/Ca ratios. The highest chlorophyll index was recorded for Capitol cv. and K/Ca ratios of nutrient solution had significant different effects on chlorophyll fluorescence. It was noted that rising K/Ca ratio caused lower longevity of cut flowers in both cvs. The highest necrosis of petals was occurred at 10:2 ratio of K/Ca and Magic Red cv. was more sensitive with the highest percentage of necrosis. The appropriate K/Ca ratio was obtained in the 6:4 ratio in terms of nutritional balance, reduced antagonistic effects of K and Ca, postharvest quality and more longevity of cut flowers.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing solution K/Ca ratio increased leaf K accumulation.

Taxon
Roset0
Treatment
K/Ca ratio in the solutione0
Outcome
accumulation of K in the leavese0
Direction
Increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing the K/Ca ratio in the solution led to accumulation of K in the leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 382–462 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rose Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing solution K/Ca ratio decreased leaf Ca concentration.

Taxon
Roset0
Treatment
K/Ca ratio in the solutione0
Outcome
Ca concentration of the leavese0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing the K/Ca ratio in the solution led to accumulation of K in the leaves but decreased the Ca concentration of the leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 382–511 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rose Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf K/Ca ratio was highest at solution ratio 10:2.

Taxon
Roset0
Treatment
nutrient solution of 10:2 K/Ca ratioe0
Outcome
ratio of K/Cae0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“highest ratio of K/Ca was recorded for the leaves of plants fed with nutrient solution of 10:2 K/Ca ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 607–712 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rose Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf K/Ca ratio was lowest at solution ratios 4:4 and 6:4.

Taxon
Roset0
Treatment
nutrient solutions of 4:4 and 6:4 K/Ca ratiose0
Outcome
K/Ca ratio of leavese0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“lowest K/Ca ratio of leaves was observed for plants which supplied with the nutrient solutions of 4:4 and 6:4 K/Ca ratios”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–842 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rose Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–115 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Capitol had the highest chlorophyll index.

Taxon
Roset0
Material
Capitole0
Outcome
chlorophyll indexe0
Direction
higheste0

Verbatim

e0

“highest chlorophyll index was recorded for Capitol cv.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–902 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rose Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient-solution K/Ca ratios significantly affected chlorophyll fluorescence.

Taxon
Roset0
Treatment
K/Ca ratios of nutrient solutione0
Outcome
chlorophyll fluorescencee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“K/Ca ratios of nutrient solution had significant different effects on chlorophyll fluorescence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–1001 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rose Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rising K/Ca ratio reduced cut-flower longevity in both cultivars.

Taxon
Roset0
Treatment
rising K/Ca ratioe0
Outcome
longevity of cut flowerse0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
both cvs.e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“rising K/Ca ratio caused lower longevity of cut flowers in both cvs.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1089 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rose Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Petal necrosis was highest at a 10:2 K/Ca ratio.

Taxon
Roset0
Treatment
10:2 ratio of K/Cae0
Outcome
necrosis of petalse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“highest necrosis of petals was occurred at 10:2 ratio of K/Ca”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1155 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rose Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–115 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Magic Red was more sensitive and had the highest petal necrosis percentage.

Taxon
Roset0
Material
Magic Rede0
Outcome
percentage of necrosise0
Direction
higheste0

Verbatim

e0

“Magic Red cv. was more sensitive with the highest percentage of necrosis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1160–1232 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rose Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–115 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors identified 6:4 K/Ca as appropriate for nutritional balance and cut-flower quality and longevity.

Taxon
Roset0
Treatment
6:4 ratioe0
Outcome
appropriate K/Ca ratioe0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“appropriate K/Ca ratio was obtained in the 6:4 ratio in terms of nutritional balance, reduced antagonistic effects of K and Ca, postharvest quality and more longevity of cut flowers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1419 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rose Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–115 · show in text ↑

calcium atom · pest · RosaPositive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

calcium atom · disease · RosaPositive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.