Paper · 2017 · Journal of Agrometeorology

Effect of elevated ozone, carbon dioxide and their interaction on growth, biomass and water use efficiency of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)

RAM NARAYAN SINGH; JOYDEEP MUKHERJEE; V. K. SEHGAL; et al.

5
claims
6
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Global climate change has a major impact on growth and sustainability of agro-ecosystem. Keeping in view the importance of rising O3 and CO2 concentration in atmosphere, a field experiment was conducted on chickpea (variety: Pusa 5023) in the experimental farm in Free Air Ozone and Carbon dioxide Enrichment (FAOCE) facility at ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI), New Delhi underfour ozone and carbon dioxide treatments (ECO: elevated CO 2 (550±10 ppm) +elevated O3 (70 ±10 ppb); EC: elevated CO 2 (550±10 ppm ppm) + ambient O3 (30±10 ppb); EO: elevated O3 (70±10 ppb)+ ambient CO 2 (400±10 ppm) and AMB; ambient CO 2 (400±10 ppm)+ ambient O3 (30± 10 ppb) during rabi season of 2016-17. The results revealed that the plant height, above ground biomass, CGR and RGR and seed yield of chickpea was significantly highest in elevated CO2 (EC) treatment followed by ECO treatment and lowest in elevated O3 (EO) treatment. Elevated ozone had negative impact whereas elevated carbon dioxide had positive impact on growth, biomass and WUE of chickpea and when both are combined the negative impact of elevated ozone were counteracted by elevated carbon dioxide.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated carbon dioxide produced the highest height, biomass, growth rates and seed yield.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
elevated CO2 (EC) treatmente0
Outcome
plant height, above ground biomass, CGR and RGRe0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
ECO treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant height, above ground biomass, CGR and RGR and seed yield of chickpea was significantly highest in elevated CO2 (EC) treatment followed by ECO treatment and lowest in elevated O3 (EO) treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–933 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated carbon dioxide produced the highest seed yield.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
elevated CO2 (EC) treatmente0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
ECO treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant height, above ground biomass, CGR and RGR and seed yield of chickpea was significantly highest in elevated CO2 (EC) treatment followed by ECO treatment and lowest in elevated O3 (EO) treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–933 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated ozone negatively affected chickpea growth, biomass and water use efficiency.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Elevated ozonee0
Outcome
growth, biomass and WUEe0
Direction
negative impacte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Elevated ozone had negative impact whereas elevated carbon dioxide had positive impact on growth, biomass and WUE of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–1059 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated carbon dioxide positively affected chickpea growth, biomass and water use efficiency.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
elevated carbon dioxidee0
Outcome
growth, biomass and WUEe0
Direction
positive impacte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“elevated carbon dioxide had positive impact on growth, biomass and WUE of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1059 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated carbon dioxide counteracted the negative ozone impact in combined treatment.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
both are combinede0
Outcome
negative impact of elevated ozonee0
Direction
counteractede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“when both are combined the negative impact of elevated ozone were counteracted by elevated carbon dioxide.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1170 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–118 · show in text ↑

co2 · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

co2 · physiology: water · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

co2 · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.