Abstract
Liming improve the properties of acidic soils and commenly increases crop productivity. The experiment to evaluate the effect of lime, manure and kitchen ash application on yield and yield components of faba bean was conducted at Yebokla kebele in Gozamin district of Amhara Region in 2017 season. The factorial combination of 0, 1.5 and 3 t/ha lime, 0, 2.5 and 5 t/ha manure and 0, 0.5 and 1 t/ha kitchen ash treatments were replicated three times and laid out in randomized complete block design. The results show shortened days to maturity was recorded from plot receiving 1.5 t lime, 2.5 t manure and 1 t/ha kitchen ash. The numbers of effective nodule was significantly higher at 1.5 t.lime and 2.5 t/ha manure while higher plant height was recorded from 1.5 t/ha lime and 5 t/ha manure treatments. Number of pods per plant increased by combined application of 2.5 t manure and 1 t/ha kitchen ash while maximum number of seeds per pod observed at 5 t/ha manure. The highest seed yield (2.59 t/ha) obtained from combined used of 1.5 t lime, 5 t manure and 0.5 t/ha kitchen ash meanwhile maximum straw yield was recorded from 5 t/ha manure rate. The economic analysis revealed that combined used of 1.5 t lime, 0.5 t kitchen ash and 5 t/ha manure gave a net profit of 26,533 Birr/ha with acceptable MRR (98%), thus this treatment is found optimum to increase crop yield on acidic soils of Gozamin district.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 12
Claim · model-written summary
Plots receiving 1.5 t lime, 2.5 t manure and 1 t/ha kitchen ash shortened days to maturity.
- Taxon
- faba bean
Vicia fabae0 - Treatment
- 1.5 t lime, 2.5 t manure and 1 t/ha kitchen ashe1
- Outcome
- days to maturitye1
- Direction
- shortenede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“yield and yield components of faba bean”
e1“shortened days to maturity was recorded from plot receiving 1.5 t lime, 2.5 t manure and 1 t/ha kitchen ash”
Claim · model-written summary
Effective nodule number was significantly higher at 1.5 t lime.
- Taxon
- faba beanVicia fabae0
- Treatment
- 1.5 t.limee2
- Outcome
- numbers of effective nodulee2
- Direction
- significantly highere2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“yield and yield components of faba bean”
e2“The numbers of effective nodule was significantly higher at 1.5 t.lime and 2.5 t/ha manure”
Claim · model-written summary
Effective nodule number was significantly higher at 2.5 t/ha manure.
- Taxon
- faba beanVicia fabae0
- Treatment
- 2.5 t/ha manuree2
- Outcome
- numbers of effective nodulee2
- Direction
- significantly highere2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“yield and yield components of faba bean”
e2“The numbers of effective nodule was significantly higher at 1.5 t.lime and 2.5 t/ha manure”
Claim · model-written summary
Plant height was higher at 1.5 t/ha lime.
- Taxon
- faba beanVicia fabae0
- Treatment
- 1.5 t/ha limee2
- Outcome
- plant heighte2
- Direction
- highere2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“yield and yield components of faba bean”
e2“while higher plant height was recorded from 1.5 t/ha lime and 5 t/ha manure treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
Plant height was higher at 5 t/ha manure.
- Taxon
- faba beanVicia fabae0
- Treatment
- 5 t/ha manuree2
- Outcome
- plant heighte2
- Direction
- highere2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“yield and yield components of faba bean”
e2“while higher plant height was recorded from 1.5 t/ha lime and 5 t/ha manure treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
Pods per plant increased with combined application of 2.5 t manure and 1 t/ha kitchen ash.
- Taxon
- faba beanVicia fabae0
- Treatment
- 2.5 t manure and 1 t/ha kitchen ashe3
- Outcome
- Number of pods per plante3
- Direction
- increasede3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“yield and yield components of faba bean”
e3“Number of pods per plant increased by combined application of 2.5 t manure and 1 t/ha kitchen ash”
Claim · model-written summary
Seeds per pod were maximum at 5 t/ha manure.
- Taxon
- faba beanVicia fabae0
- Treatment
- 5 t/ha manuree3
- Outcome
- number of seeds per pode3
- Direction
- maximume3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“yield and yield components of faba bean”
e3“maximum number of seeds per pod observed at 5 t/ha manure”
Claim · model-written summary
The highest seed yield (2.59 t/ha) was obtained from 1.5 t lime, 5 t manure and 0.5 t/ha kitchen ash.
- Taxon
- faba beanVicia fabae0
- Treatment
- 1.5 t lime, 5 t manure and 0.5 t/ha kitchen ashe4
- Outcome
- seed yielde4
- Direction
- higheste4
- Value
- 2.59 t/hae4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“yield and yield components of faba bean”
e4“The highest seed yield (2.59 t/ha) obtained from combined used of 1.5 t lime, 5 t manure and 0.5 t/ha kitchen ash”
Claim · model-written summary
Straw yield was maximum at 5 t/ha manure.
- Taxon
- faba beanVicia fabae0
- Treatment
- 5 t/ha manuree4
- Outcome
- straw yielde4
- Direction
- maximume4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“yield and yield components of faba bean”
e4“maximum straw yield was recorded from 5 t/ha manure rate”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined 1.5 t lime, 0.5 t kitchen ash and 5 t/ha manure gave a net profit of 26,533 Birr/ha.
- Taxon
- faba beanVicia fabae0
- Treatment
- 1.5 t lime, 0.5 t kitchen ash and 5 t/ha manuree5
- Outcome
- net profite5
- Value
- 26,533 Birr/hae5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“yield and yield components of faba bean”
e5“combined used of 1.5 t lime, 0.5 t kitchen ash and 5 t/ha manure gave a net profit of 26,533 Birr/ha with acceptable MRR (98%)”
Claim · model-written summary
The marginal rate of return of the combined treatment was acceptable at 98%.
- Taxon
- faba beanVicia fabae0
- Outcome
- MRRe5
- Value
- 98%e5
- Qualifier
- acceptablee5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“yield and yield components of faba bean”
e5“combined used of 1.5 t lime, 0.5 t kitchen ash and 5 t/ha manure gave a net profit of 26,533 Birr/ha with acceptable MRR (98%)”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined 1.5 t lime, 0.5 t kitchen ash and 5 t/ha manure treatment is optimum to increase faba bean yield on acidic soils of Gozamin district.
- Taxon
- faba beanVicia fabae0
- Treatment
- 1.5 t lime, 0.5 t kitchen ash and 5 t/ha manuree5
- Outcome
- increase crop yielde6
- Setting
- acidic soils of Gozamin districte6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“yield and yield components of faba bean”
e5“combined used of 1.5 t lime, 0.5 t kitchen ash and 5 t/ha manure gave a net profit of 26,533 Birr/ha with acceptable MRR (98%)”
e6“thus this treatment is found optimum to increase crop yield on acidic soils of Gozamin district”
The same questions in other papers
lime · growth · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →lime · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results
12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →fertilization · symbiosis · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results
21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- no effect
23 papers more in this group
See all 27 papers →fertilization · growth · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results
66 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- no effect
69 papers more in this group
See all 73 papers →fertilization · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results
158 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- no effect
172 papers more in this group
See all 176 papers →lime · symbiosis · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree
7 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.