Paper · 1999 · Journal of Applied Horticulture

Effect of defoliation, decapitation and deblossoming on fruit bud differentiation in guava (Psidium guajava L.).

Gorakh Singh; A.K. Singh; S Rajan

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Complete removal of leaves, along with decapitation of shoots, promoted flower bud differentiation (FBD), while ringing with partial or complete defoliation along with decapitation of shoots did not promote FBD. Decapitation of leafy shoots also promoted FBD, increasing from 44 to 63% and 37 to 54% in Sardar and Allahabad Safeda, respectively. Defoliation of same age shoots (1-3 months old) at different times of the year influenced FBD. In many cases, defoliation did not promote flowering compared with controls. Principal component analysis revealed that the time of shoot emergence was the decisive factor for FBD in 1-, 2- and 3-month-old shoots. Defoliated shoots put forth terminal extension or axillary growth, while in undefoliated ones only terminal growth took place. There is a strong indication that in guava, leaves play a favourable role in flower bud formation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Complete removal of leaves with decapitation of shoots promoted flower bud differentiation in guava.

Treatment
Complete removal of leaves, along with decapitation of shootse0
Outcome
flower bud differentiatione0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“guava (Psidium guajava L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–111 · show in text ↑
e0

“Complete removal of leaves, along with decapitation of shoots, promoted flower bud differentiation (FBD)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ringing with partial or complete defoliation plus decapitation of shoots did not promote flower bud differentiation in guava.

Treatment
ringing with partial or complete defoliation along with decapitation of shootse1
Outcome
FBDe1
Direction
did not promotee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“guava (Psidium guajava L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–111 · show in text ↑
e1

“ringing with partial or complete defoliation along with decapitation of shoots did not promote FBD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 112–210 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Decapitation of leafy shoots promoted flower bud differentiation in Sardar, with flower bud differentiation increasing from 44 to 63%.

Material
Sardare2
Treatment
Decapitation of leafy shootse2
Outcome
FBDe2
Direction
increasinge2
Value
44 to 63%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“guava (Psidium guajava L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–111 · show in text ↑
e2

“Decapitation of leafy shoots also promoted FBD, increasing from 44 to 63% and 37 to 54% in Sardar and Allahabad Safeda, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 212–344 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Decapitation of leafy shoots promoted flower bud differentiation in Allahabad Safeda, with flower bud differentiation increasing from 37 to 54%.

Material
Allahabad Safedae2
Treatment
Decapitation of leafy shootse2
Outcome
FBDe2
Direction
increasinge2
Value
37 to 54%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“guava (Psidium guajava L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–111 · show in text ↑
e2

“Decapitation of leafy shoots also promoted FBD, increasing from 44 to 63% and 37 to 54% in Sardar and Allahabad Safeda, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 212–344 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Defoliation of same-age shoots (1-3 months old) at different times of the year influenced flower bud differentiation in guava.

Organ / stage
shoots (1-3 months old)e3
Treatment
Defoliation of same age shootse3
Outcome
FBDe3

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“guava (Psidium guajava L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–111 · show in text ↑
e3

“Defoliation of same age shoots (1-3 months old) at different times of the year influenced FBD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–439 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In many cases, defoliation did not promote flowering in guava compared with controls.

Treatment
defoliatione4
Outcome
floweringe4
Direction
did not promotee4
Qualifier
In many casese4
Comparator
controlse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“guava (Psidium guajava L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–111 · show in text ↑
e4

“In many cases, defoliation did not promote flowering compared with controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 441–516 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Time of shoot emergence was the decisive factor for flower bud differentiation in 1-, 2- and 3-month-old guava shoots.

Organ / stage
1-, 2- and 3-month-old shootse5
Treatment
time of shoot emergencee5
Outcome
FBDe5

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“guava (Psidium guajava L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–111 · show in text ↑
e5

“Principal component analysis revealed that the time of shoot emergence was the decisive factor for FBD in 1-, 2- and 3-month-old shoots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 518–653 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Defoliated guava shoots put forth terminal extension or axillary growth, whereas undefoliated shoots only terminal growth.

Treatment
Defoliated shootse6
Outcome
terminal extension or axillary growthe6
Comparator
undefoliated onese6

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“guava (Psidium guajava L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–111 · show in text ↑
e6

“Defoliated shoots put forth terminal extension or axillary growth, while in undefoliated ones only terminal growth took place”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–780 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaves are indicated to play a favourable role in flower bud formation in guava.

Organ / stage
leavese7
Outcome
flower bud formatione7
Qualifier
favourable rolee7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“There is a strong indication that in guava, leaves play a favourable role in flower bud formation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 782–879 · show in text ↑

pruning · phenology · Psidium guajava (guava)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 13 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.