Paper · 2017 · Agricultural Engineering Today

Performance Evaluation of a Power Weeder in Different Forage Grasses

C. S. Sahay; Sukhwinder Singh; Prateek Pathak

9
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Testing and evaluation of engine operated power weeder was conducted in four grasses viz. Guinea grass (Panicum maximum); Fulkara grass (Bothriochloaintermedia); Bahiya grass (Paspalumnotatum) and Dinanath grass (Penisetumpendicelatum) at Central Research Farm, ICAR-Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute, Jhansi during 2014–15 and 2015–16. An engine operated, walk-behind type power weeder with an air cooled engine of 5.9 kW capacity was operated in line sown crops. The width and tool angle of shovel were 70 mm and 40o, respectively. The distance between wheels was adjusted according to the distance between the rows of crop having different row to row spacing of 0.5 and 1.0 m. The equipment was able to perform weeding in line sown crops with average field capacity in the range of 0.084 to 0.112 ha/h for different grasses with fuel consumption of 1.5 l/h. The highest weeding index of 84 and 96% at 20 days after harvesting (DAH) and 35 DAH was observed in case of guinea grass with only 2.1% plant damage at 20 DAH. The plant damage was lesser in weeding on 35 DAH due to better clarity of rows. The cost of weeding with power weeder varied from Rs.1, 866 to Rs.2, 487 per hectare as compared to Rs.4500 with manual weeding. Weeding and better management practices resulted in higher seed yield of forage crops from 100 to 250 kg/ha enhancing additional benefit of Rs.63, 000 to 1, 31, 250 per ha.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The power weeder achieved field capacity of 0.084 to 0.112 ha/h.

Taxon
Guinea grass (Panicum maximum); Fulkara grass (Bothriochloaintermedia); Bahiya grass (Paspalumnotatum) and Dinanath grass (Penisetumpendicelatum)e1
Outcome
field capacitye0
Value
0.084 to 0.112 ha/he0

Verbatim

e0

“average field capacity in the range of 0.084 to 0.112 ha/h for different grasses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–839 · show in text ↑
e1

“four grasses viz. Guinea grass (Panicum maximum); Fulkara grass (Bothriochloaintermedia); Bahiya grass (Paspalumnotatum) and Dinanath grass (Penisetumpendicelatum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 72–235 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fuel consumption was 1.5 l/h.

Taxon
Guinea grass (Panicum maximum)Megathyrsus maximuse1
Outcome
fuel consumptione0
Value
1.5 l/he0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Megathyrsus maximus
Megathyrsus maximus · TaxonHarry Rose from South West Rocks, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fuel consumption of 1.5 l/h”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–872 · show in text ↑
e1

“Guinea grass (Panicum maximum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 90–120 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Guinea grass had the highest weeding index of 84% at 20 DAH.

Taxon
guinea grassMegathyrsus maximuse0
Outcome
weeding indexe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
84e0
Qualifier
20 days after harvesting (DAH)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Megathyrsus maximus
Megathyrsus maximus · TaxonHarry Rose from South West Rocks, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest weeding index of 84 and 96% at 20 days after harvesting (DAH) and 35 DAH was observed in case of guinea grass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–995 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Guinea grass had the highest weeding index of 96% at 35 DAH.

Taxon
guinea grassMegathyrsus maximuse0
Outcome
weeding indexe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
96%e0
Qualifier
35 DAHe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Megathyrsus maximus
Megathyrsus maximus · TaxonHarry Rose from South West Rocks, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest weeding index of 84 and 96% at 20 days after harvesting (DAH) and 35 DAH was observed in case of guinea grass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–995 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Guinea grass plant damage was 2.1% at 20 DAH.

Taxon
guinea grassMegathyrsus maximuse1
Outcome
plant damagee0
Value
2.1%e0
Qualifier
20 DAHe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Megathyrsus maximus
Megathyrsus maximus · TaxonHarry Rose from South West Rocks, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with only 2.1% plant damage at 20 DAH.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1034 · show in text ↑
e1

“guinea grass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–995 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weeding at 35 DAH caused less plant damage because rows were clearer.

Taxon
Guinea grassMegathyrsus maximuse1
Treatment
weeding on 35 DAHe0
Outcome
plant damagee0
Direction
lessere0
Qualifier
better clarity of rowse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Megathyrsus maximus
Megathyrsus maximus · TaxonHarry Rose from South West Rocks, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The plant damage was lesser in weeding on 35 DAH due to better clarity of rows.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1114 · show in text ↑
e1

“Guinea grass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 90–102 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Power weeder costs ranged from Rs.1, 866 to Rs.2, 487 per hectare, below manual weeding at Rs.4500.

Outcome
cost of weedinge0
Value
Rs.1, 866 to Rs.2, 487 per hectaree0
Qualifier
Rs.4500e0
Comparator
manual weedinge0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The cost of weeding with power weeder varied from Rs.1, 866 to Rs.2, 487 per hectare as compared to Rs.4500 with manual weeding.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1115–1243 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weeding and better management increased forage seed yield from 100 to 250 kg/ha.

Taxon
forage cropse0
Treatment
Weeding and better management practicese0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
100 to 250 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Weeding and better management practices resulted in higher seed yield of forage crops from 100 to 250 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1244–1351 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The higher forage seed yield added Rs.63, 000 to 1, 31, 250 per ha in benefit.

Taxon
forage cropse1
Outcome
additional benefite0
Direction
enhancinge0
Value
Rs.63, 000 to 1, 31, 250 per hae0

Verbatim

e0

“enhancing additional benefit of Rs.63, 000 to 1, 31, 250 per ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1352–1415 · show in text ↑
e1

“forage crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1317–1329 · show in text ↑

herbicide · yield · Megathyrsus maximus (Guinea grass)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.