Paper · 1979 · Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science

The Use of Ethephon to Regulate Sex Expression of Summer Squash for Hybrid Seed Production1

S. Shannon; R. W. Robinson

4
claims
7
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract Recommended rates of (2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid (ethephon) application did not prevent staminate flower formation on summer squash ( Cucurbita pepo L.) sufficient to permit hybrid seed production without defloration. The field experiments were conducted in commercial fields in which flower development occurred during warm long day conditions, which promote maleness in squash. A strongly female ‘Cocozelle’ inbred, a strongly male ‘Straightneck’ inbred and a very strongly male ‘Crookneck’ inbred were treated at several seedling stages with rates up to 600 ppm ethephon. Two applications of 400 to 600 ppm ethephon resulted in development of the fewest staminate flowers without significantly reducing seed yield or quality. The ‘Crookneck’ inbred was least responsive to ethephon.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended ethephon rates did not prevent enough staminate flowers to avoid defloration in hybrid seed production.

Taxon
summer squashe0
Treatment
Recommended rates of (2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid (ethephon) applicatione0
Outcome
staminate flower formatione0
Direction
did not prevente0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Recommended rates of (2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid (ethephon) application did not prevent staminate flower formation on summer squash ( Cucurbita pepo L.) sufficient to permit hybrid seed production without defloration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–229 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two applications of 400 to 600 ppm ethephon produced the fewest staminate flowers.

Taxon
summer squasht0
Treatment
Two applications of 400 to 600 ppm ethephone0
Outcome
staminate flowerse0
Direction
feweste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Two applications of 400 to 600 ppm ethephon resulted in development of the fewest staminate flowers without significantly reducing seed yield or quality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–740 · show in text ↑
t0

“Summer Squash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two applications of 400 to 600 ppm ethephon did not significantly reduce seed yield or quality.

Taxon
summer squasht0
Treatment
Two applications of 400 to 600 ppm ethephone0
Outcome
seed yield or qualitye0
Direction
without significantly reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Two applications of 400 to 600 ppm ethephon resulted in development of the fewest staminate flowers without significantly reducing seed yield or quality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–740 · show in text ↑
t0

“Summer Squash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–63 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Crookneck inbred was least responsive to ethephon.

Taxon
summer squasht0
Material
‘Crookneck’e0
Outcome
responsive to ethephone0
Direction
leaste0

Verbatim

e0

“The ‘Crookneck’ inbred was least responsive to ethephon.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–797 · show in text ↑
t0

“Summer Squash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–63 · show in text ↑

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · phenology · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.