Paper · 2020 · Agriculture

Effects of Drip Irrigation with Plastic on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Biomass Distribution of Muskmelon

Jingwei Wang; Wenquan Niu; Yuan Li

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

An experiment was conducted in China to develop guidelines for the mulching drip irrigation of commercial muskmelon crops. Three sets of factors were laid out in rows to give a three × three factorial design. First, plastic covers were placed over the entire growing area (rows and inter-rows, or full), over the rows (half), or no plastic applied (none). Second, there was one irrigation pipe per row (T1), three pipes for four rows (T3/4), or one pipe for two rows (T1/2). Finally, the plants were irrigated when the soil water content fell to 60%, 70%, or 80% of field water capacity (FC). Information was collected on net CO2 assimilation (Pn), plant growth, and yield. Overall, maximum Pn occurred with half plastic covering, one irrigation pipe for two rows, and irrigation at 80% FC. Plant fresh weight was higher with half plastic covering, one irrigation pipe per row, and irrigation at 70% or 80% FC. Yield was higher with half plastic covering, and irrigation at 70% or 80% FC. There were only small differences in the yield across numbers of irrigation pipes. These results suggest that overall productivity was better with plastic covers over the rows and irrigation at 70% or 80% FC. Differences in productivity with different numbers of irrigation lines per row were small.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Net CO2 assimilation was maximal with half plastic covering, one pipe for two rows and irrigation at 80% FC.

Taxon
MuskmelonCucumis melot0
Treatment
half plastic covering, one irrigation pipe for two rows, and irrigation at 80% FCe0
Outcome
Pne0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Muskmelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–111 · show in text ↑
e0

“Overall, maximum Pn occurred with half plastic covering, one irrigation pipe for two rows, and irrigation at 80% FC.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–790 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant fresh weight was higher with half cover, one pipe per row and irrigation at 70% or 80% FC.

Taxon
MuskmelonCucumis melot0
Treatment
half plastic covering, one irrigation pipe per row, and irrigation at 70% or 80% FCe0
Outcome
Plant fresh weighte0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Muskmelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–111 · show in text ↑
e0

“Plant fresh weight was higher with half plastic covering, one irrigation pipe per row, and irrigation at 70% or 80% FC.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–910 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield was higher with half plastic cover and irrigation at 70% or 80% FC.

Taxon
MuskmelonCucumis melot0
Treatment
half plastic covering, and irrigation at 70% or 80% FCe0
Outcome
Yielde0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Muskmelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–111 · show in text ↑
e0

“Yield was higher with half plastic covering, and irrigation at 70% or 80% FC.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–988 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield differed only slightly across the numbers of irrigation pipes.

Taxon
MuskmelonCucumis melot0
Treatment
numbers of irrigation pipese0
Outcome
yielde0
Qualifier
only small differencese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Muskmelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–111 · show in text ↑
e0

“There were only small differences in the yield across numbers of irrigation pipes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1071 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommended row plastic covers and irrigation at 70% or 80% FC for productivity.

Taxon
MuskmelonCucumis melot0
Outcome
plastic covers over the rows and irrigation at 70% or 80% FCe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Muskmelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–111 · show in text ↑
e0

“These results suggest that overall productivity was better with plastic covers over the rows and irrigation at 70% or 80% FC.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1197 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Results differ

57 papers: 37 positive, 20 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

53 papers more in this group

See all 57 papers →

irrigation · physiology: photosynthesis · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

irrigation · growth · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 13 positive, 9 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.