Paper · 2020 · Applied Ecology and Environmental Research

RESIDUAL EFFECT OF ORGANIC MANURE AND RECOMMENDED NPK FERTILIZER ON YIELD AND BULB PERFORMANCE OF ONION (ALLIUM CEPA L.) AS SECOND CROP UNDER GREENHOUSE CONDITIONS

F. YOLDAS; S. CEYLAN; N. MORDOGAN

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
9
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine the residual effects of chicken manure on the yield and yield performance of eight onion varieties as second crops after lettuce under greenhouse condition. 14-16, Burgaz, Karbeyaz, Naz, NWG, Perwana, Seyhan, ampiyon varieties and also four different doses of chicken manure at the rates of 0, 20, 40, 60 t ha -1 with the recommended dose of NPK were used. A nonfertilized parcel was used as control. The experiment was laid out in split plot design and replicated three times. Yield and yield components were investigated. According to the results residual effect of chicken manure and onion varieties as second crop significantly affected the yield and bulb production in the greenhouse condition. The application of chicken manure significantly improved yield, bulb weight, bulb height, number of shoot tip, number of dried leaf compared to control. Highest yields (72.99 t ha -1 ) were obtained in the parcels where the chicken manure was applied at a rate of 20 t ha -1 . The onion cultivar Burgaz was more responsive to the chicken manure compared to other onion cultivars. The best yield was shown of Burgaz cultivar and the 20 t ha -1 chicken manure treatments by the interaction. As a result, this method is the most suitable for onion production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual chicken manure and variety significantly affected yield and bulb production.

Taxon
ONION (ALLIUM CEPA L.)Allium cepat0
Treatment
chicken manuree0
Outcome
yield and bulb productione0
Setting
greenhouse conditione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“residual effect of chicken manure and onion varieties as second crop significantly affected the yield and bulb production in the greenhouse condition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–737 · show in text ↑
t0

“ONION (ALLIUM CEPA L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chicken manure improved onion yield, bulb weight and bulb height versus control.

Taxon
ONION (ALLIUM CEPA L.)Allium cepat0
Treatment
chicken manuree0
Outcome
yield, bulb weight, bulb heighte0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of chicken manure significantly improved yield, bulb weight, bulb height, number of shoot tip, number of dried leaf compared to control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 738–890 · show in text ↑
t0

“ONION (ALLIUM CEPA L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chicken manure improved shoot-tip and dried-leaf numbers versus control.

Taxon
ONION (ALLIUM CEPA L.)Allium cepat0
Treatment
chicken manuree0
Outcome
number of shoot tip, number of dried leafe0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of chicken manure significantly improved yield, bulb weight, bulb height, number of shoot tip, number of dried leaf compared to control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 738–890 · show in text ↑
t0

“ONION (ALLIUM CEPA L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–120 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 20 t ha -1 manure rate gave the highest yield, 72.99 t ha -1.

Taxon
ONION (ALLIUM CEPA L.)Allium cepat0
Treatment
chicken manure was applied at a rate of 20 t ha -1e0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
Higheste0
Value
72.99 t ha -1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest yields (72.99 t ha -1 ) were obtained in the parcels where the chicken manure was applied at a rate of 20 t ha -1 .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–1014 · show in text ↑
t0

“ONION (ALLIUM CEPA L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–120 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Burgaz was more responsive to chicken manure than other cultivars.

Taxon
ONION (ALLIUM CEPA L.)Allium cepat0
Material
Burgaze0
Treatment
chicken manuree0
Outcome
responsive to the chicken manuree0
Direction
more responsivee0
Comparator
other onion cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The onion cultivar Burgaz was more responsive to the chicken manure compared to other onion cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1117 · show in text ↑
t0

“ONION (ALLIUM CEPA L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–120 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Burgaz with 20 t ha -1 manure had the best yield interaction.

Taxon
ONION (ALLIUM CEPA L.)Allium cepat0
Material
Burgaze0
Treatment
20 t ha -1 chicken manuree0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
beste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The best yield was shown of Burgaz cultivar and the 20 t ha -1 chicken manure treatments by the interaction.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1226 · show in text ↑
t0

“ONION (ALLIUM CEPA L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–120 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors considered the Burgaz and 20 t ha -1 manure combination most suitable for onion production.

Taxon
ONION (ALLIUM CEPA L.)Allium cepat0
Material
Burgaze0
Treatment
20 t ha -1 chicken manuree0
Outcome
most suitable for onion productione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The best yield was shown of Burgaz cultivar and the 20 t ha -1 chicken manure treatments by the interaction. As a result, this method is the most suitable for onion production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1294 · show in text ↑
t0

“ONION (ALLIUM CEPA L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–120 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

530 papers: 464 positive, 66 negative or no effect

463 papers in the same direction as this paper · 59 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

526 papers more in this group

See all 530 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.