Paper · 2020 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Effect of Weed Management on Weed Interference, Nutrient Depletion by Weeds and Production Potential of Long Duration Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.) under Irrigated Ecosystem

Amitesh Kumar Singh; R.S. Singh; Amit Kumar Singh; et al.

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

Timely weed management is important to increase productivity in s long­­-duration crop like pigeonpea. A field study to evaluate the effect of weed management on weed interference, nutrient depletion by weeds and production potential of long duration pigeonpea under irrigated ecosystem was conducted at Agricultural Research Farm, IAS, BHU, Varanasi during 2009-10 and 2010-11. Results revealed that use of imazethapyr @ 0.15 kg ha-1 followed by (fb) paraquat @ 0.4 kg ha-1 40 days after sowing (DAS) significantly (P ≤ 0.05) reduced the weed density, total weed density and total weed dry weight being statistically at par with two hand weeding (HWs) at 25 and 50 days after sowing (DAS). Weed control index, weed persistence index and weed index were the highest in weed- free, 2- HWs and imazethapyr applied @ 0.15 kg ha-1 fb paraquat 0.4 kg ha-1. However, weed-free treatment resulted in per cent higher yield attributes like pods plant-1 (32.0 and 29.5%), grains pod-1 (34 and 32.6%), 1000-grain weight (25.8 and 21.5%), grain yield (48.7 and 47.5%), gross returns (46.0 and 45.0%), net returns (54.6 and 53.0%) and benefit-cost ratio (40.7 and 38.5%), being significantly higher than weedy check but remained at par with 2-HWs, imazethapyr @ 0.15 kg ha-1 fb paraquat @ 0.4 kg ha-1. The highest nutrient depletion by weeds was recorded in weedy check, whereas, the lowest was in imazethapyr @ 0.15 kg ha-1 fb paraquat 0.4 kg ha-1.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sequential imazethapyr and paraquat significantly reduced weed density.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
imazethapyr @ 0.15 kg ha-1 followed by (fb) paraquat @ 0.4 kg ha-1 40 days after sowing (DAS)e0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed densitye0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“use of imazethapyr @ 0.15 kg ha-1 followed by (fb) paraquat @ 0.4 kg ha-1 40 days after sowing (DAS) significantly (P ≤ 0.05) reduced the weed density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–551 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sequential imazethapyr and paraquat significantly reduced total weed dry weight.

Taxon
PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
imazethapyr @ 0.15 kg ha-1 followed by (fb) paraquat @ 0.4 kg ha-1 40 days after sowing (DAS)e0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
total weed dry weighte0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“use of imazethapyr @ 0.15 kg ha-1 followed by (fb) paraquat @ 0.4 kg ha-1 40 days after sowing (DAS) significantly (P ≤ 0.05) reduced the weed density, total weed density and total weed dry weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–597 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–127 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sequential herbicide treatment was statistically at par with two hand weedings for weed suppression.

Taxon
PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Outcome
statistically at pare0
Comparator
two hand weeding (HWs) at 25 and 50 days after sowing (DAS)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“being statistically at par with two hand weeding (HWs) at 25 and 50 days after sowing (DAS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–689 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–127 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed-free plots had higher pods per plant than the weedy check in both years.

Taxon
PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
weed-free treatmente0
Outcome
pods plant-1e0
Direction
highere0
Value
32.0 and 29.5%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“weed-free treatment resulted in per cent higher yield attributes like pods plant-1 (32.0 and 29.5%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–960 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–127 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed-free plots had higher grains per pod in both years.

Taxon
PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Outcome
grains pod-1e0
Value
34 and 32.6%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grains pod-1 (34 and 32.6%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–989 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–127 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed-free plots had higher 1000-grain weight in both years.

Taxon
PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Outcome
1000-grain weighte0
Value
25.8 and 21.5%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“1000-grain weight (25.8 and 21.5%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1025 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–127 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed-free plots had higher grain yield in both years.

Taxon
PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Value
48.7 and 47.5%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain yield (48.7 and 47.5%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1055 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–127 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed-free plots had higher gross returns in both years.

Taxon
PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Outcome
gross returnse0
Value
46.0 and 45.0%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“gross returns (46.0 and 45.0%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1087 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–127 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed-free plots had higher net returns in both years.

Taxon
PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Outcome
net returnse0
Value
54.6 and 53.0%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“net returns (54.6 and 53.0%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1117 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–127 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed-free plots had higher benefit-cost ratio in both years.

Taxon
PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Outcome
benefit-cost ratioe0
Value
40.7 and 38.5%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“benefit-cost ratio (40.7 and 38.5%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1157 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–127 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient depletion by weeds was greatest in the weedy check.

Taxon
PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
weedy checke0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
nutrient depletion by weedse0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest nutrient depletion by weeds was recorded in weedy check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1289–1356 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–127 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient depletion by weeds was lowest after sequential herbicide application.

Taxon
PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
imazethapyr @ 0.15 kg ha-1 fb paraquat 0.4 kg ha-1e0
Outcome
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest was in imazethapyr @ 0.15 kg ha-1 fb paraquat 0.4 kg ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1367–1435 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–127 · show in text ↑

paraquat · weed · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Imazethapyr · weed · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree

18 papers: 18 positive, 0 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.