Paper · 2020 · Revista CERES

Effects of limestone and organic fertilizer on cassava yield and on chemical and physical soil properties

Amarílis Beraldo Rós; Nobuyoshi Narita; Andréia Cristina Silva Hirata; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Cassava has a high yield potential that can be achieved with adequate liming and fertilization of the soil. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of organic fertilizer application, in association or not with liming, on yield and morphological characteristics of cassava roots and on chemical and physical properties of the soil. The experiment was arranged in the split plot design. The plots corresponded to limestone rates (0 and 2.5 t ha-1) and the sub-plots to chicken manure rates (0, 4, 8, and 12 t ha-1). Yield showed no response to limestone application, but responded to manure, producing 43 t ha-1 of roots at the rate of 8 t ha-1. The treatments had no influence on soil density and total porosity. The addition of manure increased the concentrations of P and K, while the addition of limestone increased Ca and Mg in the soil. The pH was affected only by limestone. Therefore, limestone does not affect crop yield and soil physical properties up to the amount used. Use of chicken manure up to 8 t ha-1 increased yield. Limestone and manure affect soil fertility in different ways.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Limestone did not change cassava root yield.

Treatment
limestone applicatione0
Outcome
Yielde0
Direction
no responsee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield showed no response to limestone application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–578 · show in text ↑
t0

“cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure increased cassava root yield to 43 t ha-1 at 8 t ha-1.

Treatment
manuree0
Outcome
rootse0
Direction
respondede0
Value
43 t ha-1e0
Qualifier
rate of 8 t ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“responded to manure, producing 43 t ha-1 of roots at the rate of 8 t ha-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 584–658 · show in text ↑
t0

“cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments did not affect soil density or total porosity.

Treatment
treatmentse0
Outcome
soil density and total porositye0
Direction
no influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatments had no influence on soil density and total porosity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–726 · show in text ↑
t0

“cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure increased soil P and K concentrations.

Treatment
manuree0
Outcome
concentrations of P and Ke0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The addition of manure increased the concentrations of P and K”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–789 · show in text ↑
t0

“cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Limestone increased soil Ca and Mg concentrations.

Treatment
limestonee0
Outcome
Ca and Mg in the soile0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the addition of limestone increased Ca and Mg in the soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–855 · show in text ↑
t0

“cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only limestone affected soil pH.

Treatment
limestonee0
Outcome
pHe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The pH was affected only by limestone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–894 · show in text ↑
t0

“cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–54 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded that chicken manure up to 8 t ha-1 increases cassava yield.

Treatment
chicken manure up to 8 t ha-1e0
Outcome
Use of chicken manure up to 8 t ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Use of chicken manure up to 8 t ha-1 increased yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1048 · show in text ↑
t0

“cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–54 · show in text ↑

fertilization · growth · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Positive and negative results

71 papers: 65 positive, 6 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

67 papers more in this group

See all 71 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.