Paper · 2019 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Effect of Micronutrients on Growth and Yield of Sweet Sorghum under Tarai Region of Uttarakhand

Brajkishor Prajapati; Kewal anand

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

Field experiment was conducted to evaluate response of micronutrient on growth and yield of sweet sorghum at Instructional Dairy Farm, G.B.P.U.A. & T., Pantnagar, U.S.Nagar, Uttarakhand during Kharif seasons of 2012 and 2013. The soil of experimental site was silty clay loam having 7.7 pH, 0.81 % organic carbon, 273.35, 25.69 and 240 kg/ha available N, P and K respectively. The experiment was laid out in Randomized Block Design with 3 replications and ten treatments consisted of control, NPK 120:60:40 kg/ha (RDF), RDF+ZnSO4 25 kg/ha, RDF+FeSO4 25 kg/ha, RDF+0.2% ZnSO4 spray at 15 and 30 DAS, RDF+0.4% FeSO4 spray at 15 and30 DAS, RDF+0.2% ZnSO4+0.4% FeSO4 spray at 15 and 30 DAS, RDF+ZnSO4 15 kg/ha+0.2% ZnSO4 spray at 15 and 30 DAS, RDF+FeSO4 15 kg/ha+0.4% FeS04 spray at 15 and 30 DAS and RDF+ ZnSO4 15 kg/ha+FeSO4 15 kg/ha as soil application. RDF (NPK 120:60:40 kg/ha) in combination with ZnSO4 15 kg/ha + FeSO4 15 kg/ha as soil application showed maximum growth attributes characters (plant height, L:S, stem diameter), dry matter content, crude protein content, green fodder yield of 613.36 and 624.63 q/ha, dry fodder yield of 170.39, 177.21 q/ha as well as crude protein yield 16.65 and 17.44 q/ha, net and B:C ratio during 2012 and 2013, respectively followed by RDF+ZnSO4 25 kg/ha.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined soil ZnSO4 and FeSO4 with RDF maximized growth attributes.

Taxon
sweet sorghume0
Treatment
RDF (NPK 120:60:40 kg/ha) in combination with ZnSO4 15 kg/ha + FeSO4 15 kg/ha as soil applicatione1
Outcome
growth attributes characters (plant height, L:S, stem diameter)e1
Direction
maximume1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“sweet sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 92–105 · show in text ↑
e1

“RDF (NPK 120:60:40 kg/ha) in combination with ZnSO4 15 kg/ha + FeSO4 15 kg/ha as soil application showed maximum growth attributes characters (plant height, L:S, stem diameter)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–1030 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined soil treatment maximized dry matter and crude protein content.

Taxon
sweet sorghume0
Treatment
RDF (NPK 120:60:40 kg/ha) in combination with ZnSO4 15 kg/ha + FeSO4 15 kg/ha as soil applicatione1
Outcome
dry matter content, crude protein contente1
Direction
maximume1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“sweet sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 92–105 · show in text ↑
e1

“RDF (NPK 120:60:40 kg/ha) in combination with ZnSO4 15 kg/ha + FeSO4 15 kg/ha as soil application showed maximum growth attributes characters (plant height, L:S, stem diameter), dry matter content, crude protein content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–1073 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined soil treatment produced green fodder yields of 613.36 and 624.63 q/ha in 2012 and 2013.

Taxon
sweet sorghume0
Treatment
ZnSO4 15 kg/ha + FeSO4 15 kg/ha as soil applicatione1
Outcome
green fodder yielde1
Direction
maximume1
Value
613.36 and 624.63 q/hae1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“sweet sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 92–105 · show in text ↑
e1

“ZnSO4 15 kg/ha + FeSO4 15 kg/ha as soil application showed maximum growth attributes characters (plant height, L:S, stem diameter), dry matter content, crude protein content, green fodder yield of 613.36 and 624.63 q/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–1119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined soil treatment produced dry fodder yields of 170.39 and 177.21 q/ha.

Taxon
sweet sorghume0
Treatment
ZnSO4 15 kg/ha + FeSO4 15 kg/ha as soil applicatione1
Outcome
dry fodder yielde1
Direction
maximume1
Value
170.39, 177.21 q/hae1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“sweet sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 92–105 · show in text ↑
e1

“ZnSO4 15 kg/ha + FeSO4 15 kg/ha as soil application showed maximum growth attributes characters (plant height, L:S, stem diameter), dry matter content, crude protein content, green fodder yield of 613.36 and 624.63 q/ha, dry fodder yield of 170.39, 177.21 q/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–1160 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined soil treatment produced crude protein yields of 16.65 and 17.44 q/ha.

Taxon
sweet sorghume0
Treatment
ZnSO4 15 kg/ha + FeSO4 15 kg/ha as soil applicatione1
Outcome
crude protein yielde1
Direction
maximume1
Value
16.65 and 17.44 q/hae1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“sweet sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 92–105 · show in text ↑
e1

“ZnSO4 15 kg/ha + FeSO4 15 kg/ha as soil application showed maximum growth attributes characters (plant height, L:S, stem diameter), dry matter content, crude protein content, green fodder yield of 613.36 and 624.63 q/ha, dry fodder yield of 170.39, 177.21 q/ha as well as crude protein yield 16.65 and 17.44 q/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–1212 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined soil treatment maximized net returns and B:C ratio, followed by RDF plus ZnSO4.

Taxon
sweet sorghume0
Treatment
ZnSO4 15 kg/ha + FeSO4 15 kg/ha as soil applicatione1
Outcome
net and B:C ratioe1
Direction
maximume1
Comparator
RDF+ZnSO4 25 kg/hae1

Verbatim

e0

“sweet sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 92–105 · show in text ↑
e1

“ZnSO4 15 kg/ha + FeSO4 15 kg/ha as soil application showed maximum growth attributes characters (plant height, L:S, stem diameter), dry matter content, crude protein content, green fodder yield of 613.36 and 624.63 q/ha, dry fodder yield of 170.39, 177.21 q/ha as well as crude protein yield 16.65 and 17.44 q/ha, net and B:C ratio during 2012 and 2013, respectively followed by RDF+ZnSO4 25 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–1297 · show in text ↑

iron(2+) sulfate (anhydrous) · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

zinc sulfate · quality: protein · SorghumResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

iron(2+) sulfate (anhydrous) · growth · SorghumResults agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

zinc sulfate · growth · SorghumResults agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

zinc sulfate · yield · SorghumResults agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

fertilization · growth · SorghumResults differ

120 papers: 104 positive, 16 negative or no effect

103 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

116 papers more in this group

See all 120 papers →

application · growth · SorghumPositive and negative results

43 papers: 36 positive, 7 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

fertilization · quality: protein · SorghumPositive and negative results

53 papers: 47 positive, 6 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.