Paper · 2019 · Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Hortorum Cultus

TILLAGE MANAGEMENT EFFECTS ON PEA YIELD AND CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF PEA SEEDS

Andrzej Woźniak; Dorota Gawęda

9
claims
16
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Productivity of plants is determined by multiple factors that directly affect one another, therefore yield variability may be high and difficult to predict. Most often, however, a lower crop yield is achieved in the notillage system than in the ploughing system. An exact field experiment was undertaken to determine the yield and chemical composition of pea seeds sown under conditions of: 1) conventional tillage – CT (shallow ploughing and harrowing after the harvest of previous crop, pre-winter ploughing in winter); 2) reduced tillage – RT (stubble cultivator after the harvest of previous crop); and 3) herbicide tillage – HT (only glyphosate after the harvest of previous crop). A cultivation unit was applied on all plots in the springtime. Pea seed yield was higher by 14.1% in the CT than in the RT system and by 50.5% than in the HT system. The CT system was increasing the plant number m–2, number of pods and seeds m–2, seed mass per plant, and 1000 seeds mass, compared to the other systems. Protein content of seeds was at a similar level in all analyzed tillage systems, but was affected by the study year. In turn, the mineral composition of seeds was determined by both tillage system and study year. The seeds harvested from CT plots contained more phosphorus and iron, those from RT plots – more calcium and zinc, whereas those from HT plots – more phytate-P, potassium, magnesium, and copper, compared to the seeds from the other plots.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage raised pea seed yield 14.1% over reduced tillage.

Treatment
CTe0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
14.1%e0
Comparator
RTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pea seed yield was higher by 14.1% in the CT than in the RT system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–816 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage raised pea seed yield 50.5% over herbicide tillage.

Treatment
CTe0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
50.5%e0
Comparator
HTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pea seed yield was higher by 14.1% in the CT than in the RT system and by 50.5% than in the HT system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–851 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage increased plant density, pods and seeds per area, seed mass per plant, and thousand seed mass.

Treatment
CTe0
Outcome
plant number m–2, number of pods and seeds m–2, seed mass per plant, and 1000 seeds masse0
Direction
increasinge0
Comparator
other systemse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The CT system was increasing the plant number m–2, number of pods and seeds m–2, seed mass per plant, and 1000 seeds mass, compared to the other systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–1005 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEA YIELD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed protein content was similar across tillage systems.

Treatment
tillage systemse0
Outcome
Protein content of seedse0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
all analyzed tillage systemse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Protein content of seeds was at a similar level in all analyzed tillage systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1086 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEA YIELD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–39 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed protein content varied with study year.

Outcome
Protein content of seedse0
Qualifier
study yeare0
Setting
study yeare0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Protein content of seeds was at a similar level in all analyzed tillage systems, but was affected by the study year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1122 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEA YIELD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–39 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed mineral composition varied with tillage system and year.

Treatment
tillage systeme0
Outcome
mineral composition of seedse0
Setting
study yeare0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the mineral composition of seeds was determined by both tillage system and study year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1133–1218 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEA YIELD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage seeds had more phosphorus and iron than seeds from other plots.

Treatment
CTe0
Outcome
phosphorus and irone0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
other plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The seeds harvested from CT plots contained more phosphorus and iron, those from RT plots – more calcium and zinc, whereas those from HT plots – more phytate-P, potassium, magnesium, and copper, compared to the seeds from the other plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1457 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEA YIELD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced tillage seeds had more calcium and zinc than seeds from other plots.

Treatment
RTe0
Outcome
calcium and zince0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
other plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“those from RT plots – more calcium and zinc, whereas those from HT plots – more phytate-P, potassium, magnesium, and copper, compared to the seeds from the other plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1290–1457 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEA YIELD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide tillage seeds had more phytate-P, potassium, magnesium, and copper.

Treatment
HTe0
Outcome
phytate-P, potassium, magnesium, and coppere0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
other plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“those from HT plots – more phytate-P, potassium, magnesium, and copper, compared to the seeds from the other plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1343–1457 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEA YIELD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–39 · show in text ↑

tillage · quality: protein · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

tillage · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

69 papers: 53 positive, 16 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.