Paper · 2019 · Julius Kühn-Institut

Root transcriptome reveals responses to plastic film mulching and grass cover in wine grape 'Cabernet Sauvignon' root and berry

Wang, Rui; Sun, Quan; Xing, Xu

17
claims
46
verbatim quotes
5
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This study was designed to investigate the influence of grass and film mulching on grape (V. vinifera) fruit quality and root transcriptome. The groundcovers (plastic film and seeds of herba portulacae and E. humifusa Willd) were set or sawn on the ground under wine grape plants ('Cabernet Sauvignon'). Test plots in the control group were treated with clean tillage. Properties of plant biochemicals under covers and grape berry quality were determined after two years. RNA-seq was analyzed for grape roots under different treatments. E. humifusa Willd cover increased plant total N and P; and film mulching increased plant total P and decreased plant total K. Herba portulacae cover decreased berry tannin and increased anthocyanin, soluble solid and titratable acid; E. humifusa Willd cover increased anthocyanin, soluble solid and titratable acid. Film mulching increased the contents of berry total phenols, soluble solid, and decreased titratable acid significantly in comparison with clean tillage. Root RNA-seq showed that there were 1, 0, and 42 differently expressed genes (DEGs) in Herba portulacae, E. humifusa Willd and film cover, compared with clean tillage, respectively. Film mulching increased the expression of root high-affinity nitrate transporter 2.1 (NRT2.1), NRT2.4 and glutamine synthetase, which associated with 'Nitrogen metabolism', and decreased the expression of root small class I/II heat shock proteins. Plastic film mulching increased grapple quality properties via activating N metabolism. Film mulching was a more excellent mulching for improving grape quality than grass cover in Ningxia, China.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

E. humifusa Willd cover increased total N and P in the plant compared with clean tillage.

Taxon
wine grapeVitis viniferae1
Treatment
E. humifusa Willd covere3
Outcome
plant total N and Pe3
Direction
increasede3
Comparator
clean tillagee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“under wine grape plants ('Cabernet Sauvignon')”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 256–302 · show in text ↑
e2

“Test plots in the control group were treated with clean tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 304–367 · show in text ↑
e3

“E. humifusa Willd cover increased plant total N and P”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–590 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Film mulching increased total P in the plant compared with clean tillage.

Taxon
wine grapeVitis viniferae1
Treatment
film mulchinge4
Outcome
plant total Pe4
Direction
increasede4
Comparator
clean tillagee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“under wine grape plants ('Cabernet Sauvignon')”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 256–302 · show in text ↑
e2

“Test plots in the control group were treated with clean tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 304–367 · show in text ↑
e4

“film mulching increased plant total P and decreased plant total K”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–661 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Film mulching decreased total K in the plant compared with clean tillage.

Taxon
wine grapeVitis viniferae1
Treatment
film mulchinge4
Outcome
plant total Ke4
Direction
decreasede4
Comparator
clean tillagee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“under wine grape plants ('Cabernet Sauvignon')”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 256–302 · show in text ↑
e2

“Test plots in the control group were treated with clean tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 304–367 · show in text ↑
e4

“film mulching increased plant total P and decreased plant total K”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–661 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herba portulacae cover decreased berry tannin compared with clean tillage.

Taxon
wine grapeVitis viniferae1
Organ / stage
berrye5
Treatment
Herba portulacae covere5
Outcome
berry tannine5
Direction
decreasede5
Comparator
clean tillagee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“under wine grape plants ('Cabernet Sauvignon')”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 256–302 · show in text ↑
e2

“Test plots in the control group were treated with clean tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 304–367 · show in text ↑
e5

“Herba portulacae cover decreased berry tannin and increased anthocyanin, soluble solid and titratable acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–769 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herba portulacae cover increased berry anthocyanin, soluble solids and titratable acid compared with clean tillage.

Taxon
wine grapeVitis viniferae1
Organ / stage
berrye5
Treatment
Herba portulacae covere5
Outcome
anthocyanin, soluble solid and titratable acide5
Direction
increasede5
Comparator
clean tillagee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“under wine grape plants ('Cabernet Sauvignon')”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 256–302 · show in text ↑
e2

“Test plots in the control group were treated with clean tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 304–367 · show in text ↑
e5

“Herba portulacae cover decreased berry tannin and increased anthocyanin, soluble solid and titratable acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–769 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

E. humifusa Willd cover increased berry anthocyanin, soluble solids and titratable acid compared with clean tillage.

Taxon
wine grapeVitis viniferae1
Treatment
E. humifusa Willd covere6
Outcome
anthocyanin, soluble solid and titratable acide6
Direction
increasede6
Comparator
clean tillagee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“under wine grape plants ('Cabernet Sauvignon')”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 256–302 · show in text ↑
e2

“Test plots in the control group were treated with clean tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 304–367 · show in text ↑
e6

“E. humifusa Willd cover increased anthocyanin, soluble solid and titratable acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–851 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Film mulching increased berry total phenols and soluble solids compared with clean tillage.

Taxon
wine grapeVitis viniferae1
Organ / stage
berrye7
Treatment
Film mulchinge7
Outcome
berry total phenols, soluble solide7
Direction
increasede7
Comparator
clean tillagee7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“under wine grape plants ('Cabernet Sauvignon')”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 256–302 · show in text ↑
e2

“Test plots in the control group were treated with clean tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 304–367 · show in text ↑
e7

“Film mulching increased the contents of berry total phenols, soluble solid, and decreased titratable acid significantly in comparison with clean tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–1005 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Film mulching decreased berry titratable acid compared with clean tillage.

Taxon
wine grapeVitis viniferae1
Organ / stage
berrye7
Treatment
Film mulchinge7
Outcome
titratable acide7
Direction
decreasede7
Comparator
clean tillagee7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“under wine grape plants ('Cabernet Sauvignon')”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 256–302 · show in text ↑
e2

“Test plots in the control group were treated with clean tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 304–367 · show in text ↑
e7

“Film mulching increased the contents of berry total phenols, soluble solid, and decreased titratable acid significantly in comparison with clean tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–1005 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herba portulacae cover changed the expression of 1 differentially expressed gene in roots compared with clean tillage.

Taxon
wine grapeVitis viniferae1
Organ / stage
Roote0
Treatment
Herba portulacaee0
Outcome
differently expressed genes (DEGs)e0
Value
1e0
Comparator
clean tillagee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“under wine grape plants ('Cabernet Sauvignon')”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 256–302 · show in text ↑
e0

“Root RNA-seq showed that there were 1, 0, and 42 differently expressed genes (DEGs) in Herba portulacae, E. humifusa Willd and film cover, compared with clean tillage, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1187 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

E. humifusa Willd cover changed the expression of 0 differentially expressed genes in roots compared with clean tillage.

Taxon
wine grapeVitis viniferae1
Organ / stage
Roote0
Treatment
E. humifusa Willde0
Outcome
differently expressed genes (DEGs)e0
Value
0e0
Comparator
clean tillagee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“under wine grape plants ('Cabernet Sauvignon')”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 256–302 · show in text ↑
e0

“Root RNA-seq showed that there were 1, 0, and 42 differently expressed genes (DEGs) in Herba portulacae, E. humifusa Willd and film cover, compared with clean tillage, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1187 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Film cover changed the expression of 42 differentially expressed genes in roots compared with clean tillage.

Taxon
wine grapeVitis viniferae1
Organ / stage
Roote0
Treatment
film covere0
Outcome
differently expressed genes (DEGs)e0
Value
42e0
Comparator
clean tillagee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“under wine grape plants ('Cabernet Sauvignon')”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 256–302 · show in text ↑
e0

“Root RNA-seq showed that there were 1, 0, and 42 differently expressed genes (DEGs) in Herba portulacae, E. humifusa Willd and film cover, compared with clean tillage, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1187 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Film mulching increased root NRT2.1 expression compared with clean tillage.

Taxon
wine grapeVitis viniferae1
Organ / stage
roote0
Treatment
Film mulchinge0
Gene
NRT2.1e0
Outcome
expressione0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
clean tillagee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“under wine grape plants ('Cabernet Sauvignon')”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 256–302 · show in text ↑
e2

“Test plots in the control group were treated with clean tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 304–367 · show in text ↑
e0

“Film mulching increased the expression of root high-affinity nitrate transporter 2.1 (NRT2.1), NRT2.4 and glutamine synthetase, which associated with 'Nitrogen metabolism'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1189–1360 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Film mulching increased root NRT2.4 expression compared with clean tillage.

Taxon
wine grapeVitis viniferae1
Organ / stage
roote0
Treatment
Film mulchinge0
Gene
NRT2.4e0
Outcome
expressione0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
clean tillagee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“under wine grape plants ('Cabernet Sauvignon')”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 256–302 · show in text ↑
e2

“Test plots in the control group were treated with clean tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 304–367 · show in text ↑
e0

“Film mulching increased the expression of root high-affinity nitrate transporter 2.1 (NRT2.1), NRT2.4 and glutamine synthetase, which associated with 'Nitrogen metabolism'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1189–1360 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Film mulching increased root glutamine synthetase expression compared with clean tillage.

Taxon
wine grapeVitis viniferae1
Organ / stage
roote0
Treatment
Film mulchinge0
Gene
glutamine synthetasee0
Outcome
expressione0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
clean tillagee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“under wine grape plants ('Cabernet Sauvignon')”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 256–302 · show in text ↑
e2

“Test plots in the control group were treated with clean tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 304–367 · show in text ↑
e0

“Film mulching increased the expression of root high-affinity nitrate transporter 2.1 (NRT2.1), NRT2.4 and glutamine synthetase, which associated with 'Nitrogen metabolism'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1189–1360 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Film mulching decreased root expression of small class I/II heat shock proteins compared with clean tillage.

Taxon
wine grapeVitis viniferae1
Organ / stage
roote3
Treatment
Film mulchinge0
Gene
small class I/II heat shock proteinse3
Outcome
expressione3
Direction
decreasede3
Comparator
clean tillagee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“under wine grape plants ('Cabernet Sauvignon')”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 256–302 · show in text ↑
e2

“Test plots in the control group were treated with clean tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 304–367 · show in text ↑
e0

“Film mulching increased the expression of root high-affinity nitrate transporter 2.1 (NRT2.1), NRT2.4 and glutamine synthetase, which associated with 'Nitrogen metabolism'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1189–1360 · show in text ↑
e3

“decreased the expression of root small class I/II heat shock proteins”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1366–1435 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plastic film mulching improves grape quality properties by activating nitrogen metabolism.

Taxon
wine grapeVitis viniferae1
Treatment
Plastic film mulchinge4
Outcome
grapple quality propertiese4
Qualifier
via activating N metabolisme4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“under wine grape plants ('Cabernet Sauvignon')”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 256–302 · show in text ↑
e4

“Plastic film mulching increased grapple quality properties via activating N metabolism”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1437–1523 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Film mulching was more effective than grass cover for improving grape quality in Ningxia, China.

Taxon
grapee0
Treatment
Film mulchinge0
Outcome
grape qualitye0
Direction
more excellente0
Comparator
grass covere0
Setting
Ningxia, Chinae0

Verbatim

e0

“Film mulching was a more excellent mulching for improving grape quality than grass cover in Ningxia, China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1525–1631 · show in text ↑

mulching · quality: general · VitisPositive and negative results

9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

mulching · quality: phytochemicals · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.