Paper · 2020 · Agronomy Journal

Nitrogen effect on zinc biofortification of maize and cowpea in Zimbabwean smallholder farms

Muneta G. Manzeke; Florence Mtambanengwe; Michael J. Watts; et al.

7
claims
8
verbatim quotes
28
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract Agronomic biofortification of crops with zinc (Zn) can be enhanced under increased nitrogen (N) supply. Here, the effects of N fertilizer on grain Zn concentration of maize ( Zea mays L.) and cowpea ( Vigna unguiculata L.) were determined at two contrasting sites in Zimbabwe over two seasons. All treatments received soil and foliar zinc‐sulphate fertilizer. Seven N treatments, with three N rates (0, 45, and 90 kg ha −1 for maize; 0, 15, and 30 kg ha −1 for cowpea), two N forms (mineral and organic), and combinations thereof were used for each crop in a randomized complete block design ( n = 4). Maize grain Zn concentrations increased from 27.2 to 39.3 mg kg −1 across sites. At 45 kg N ha −1 , mineral N fertilizer increased maize grain Zn concentration more than organic N from cattle manure or a combination of mineral and organic N fertilizers. At 90 kg N ha −1 , the three N fertilizer application strategies had similar effects on maize grain Zn concentration. Co‐application of N and Zn fertilizer was more effective at increasing Zn concentration in maize grain than Zn fertilizer alone. Increases in cowpea grain Zn concentration were less consistent, although grain Zn concentration increased from 39.8 to 52.7 mg kg −1 under optimal co‐applications of N and Zn. Future cost/benefit analyses of agronomic biofortification need to include information on benefits of agro‐fortified grain, complex farmer management decisions (including cost and access to both N and Zn fertilizers), as well as understanding of the spatial and site‐specific variation in fertilizer responses.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize grain zinc concentration increased across sites from 27.2 to 39.3 mg kg −1.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse0
Outcome
grain Zn concentrationse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
27.2 to 39.3 mg kg −1e0
Setting
across sitese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maize grain Zn concentrations increased from 27.2 to 39.3 mg kg −1 across sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–690 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 45 kg N ha −1, mineral N increased maize grain zinc more than organic or combined N.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
45 kg N ha −1 , mineral N fertilizere0
Outcome
grain Zn concentratione0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
organic N from cattle manure or a combination of mineral and organic N fertilizerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At 45 kg N ha −1 , mineral N fertilizer increased maize grain Zn concentration more than organic N from cattle manure or a combination of mineral and organic N fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–863 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 90 kg N ha −1, the three N strategies had similar effects on maize grain zinc.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
90 kg N ha −1e0
Outcome
grain Zn concentratione0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
three N fertilizer application strategiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At 90 kg N ha −1 , the three N fertilizer application strategies had similar effects on maize grain Zn concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–981 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N and Zn together increased maize grain zinc more effectively than Zn alone.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Co‐application of N and Zn fertilizere0
Outcome
Zn concentration in maize graine0
Direction
increasinge0
Comparator
Zn fertilizer alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Co‐application of N and Zn fertilizer was more effective at increasing Zn concentration in maize grain than Zn fertilizer alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1110 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea grain zinc responses were less consistent.

Outcome
grain Zn concentratione0
Direction
Increasese0
Qualifier
less consistente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increases in cowpea grain Zn concentration were less consistent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1112–1175 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under optimal N and Zn co-application, cowpea grain zinc rose from 39.8 to 52.7 mg kg −1.

Treatment
optimal co‐applications of N and Zne0
Outcome
grain Zn concentratione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
39.8 to 52.7 mg kg −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain Zn concentration increased from 39.8 to 52.7 mg kg −1 under optimal co‐applications of N and Zn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1186–1287 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–60 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend considering fortified-grain benefits, farmer management, fertilizer access and spatial variation in future cost-benefit analyses.

Taxon
graine0
Outcome
cost/benefit analyses of agronomic biofortificatione0

Verbatim

e0

“Future cost/benefit analyses of agronomic biofortification need to include information on benefits of agro‐fortified grain, complex farmer management decisions (including cost and access to both N and Zn fertilizers), as well as understanding of the spatial and site‐specific variation in fertilizer responses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1289–1598 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

235 papers: 199 positive, 36 negative or no effect

198 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

231 papers more in this group

See all 235 papers →

cobalt atom · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

489 papers: 403 positive, 86 negative or no effect

402 papers in the same direction as this paper · 83 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

485 papers more in this group

See all 489 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,164 papers: 1,026 positive, 138 negative or no effect

1,025 papers in the same direction as this paper · 127 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,160 papers more in this group

See all 1,164 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.