Paper · 2019 · Revista Caatinga

RESPONSE OF FORAGE SORGHUM TO WATER AVAILABILITY IN A TYPIC QUARTZIPSAMMENT

ILDEU DE OLIVEIRA ANDRADE JÚNIOR; SILVÂNIO RODRIGUES DOS SANTOS; MARCOS KOITI KONDO; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

ABSTRACT The objective of this work was to determine the factors of soil water availability (FSWA) that result in the highest agronomic performance of irrigated forage sorghum, with no changes in the plants' chemical-bromatological composition. The experiment was conducted at the Montes Claros State University, Janaúba campus, MG, Brazil, in a Typic Quartzipsamment (Neossolo Flúvico Psamítico - Embrapa) with 59 mm of soil water storage capacity in the 0.0-0.3 m layer, under drip irrigation. A randomized block design with four replications and a split-plot arrangement was used, consisting of five FSWA (f0.2 = 0.20; f0.35 = 0.35; f0.5 = 0.50; f0.65 = 0.65, and f0.8 = 0.80) in the plots and two simple forage sorghum hybrids (Volumax® and BRS-655) in the split-plots. The evaluations were based on fortnightly measurements of plant height, plant transversal diameter, number of leaves per plant, leaf area index, relative chlorophyll content, stem diameter, panicle length, dry matter yield, water use efficiency, crude protein, mineral matter, acid detergent fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and lignin. The FSWA of 0.20 and 0.35 increased dry matter yield and plant height of the two evaluated sorghum hybrids. The Volumax hybrid presented more crude protein content and acid detergent fiber. The evaluated FSWA did not change the chemical-bromatological composition of the sorghum hybrids.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FSWA of 0.20 and 0.35 increased sorghum dry matter yield.

Taxon
FORAGE SORGHUMt0
Treatment
FSWA of 0.20 and 0.35e0
Outcome
dry matter yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The FSWA of 0.20 and 0.35 increased dry matter yield and plant height of the two evaluated sorghum hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1216 · show in text ↑
t0

“FORAGE SORGHUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FSWA of 0.20 and 0.35 increased sorghum plant height.

Taxon
FORAGE SORGHUMt0
Treatment
FSWA of 0.20 and 0.35e0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The FSWA of 0.20 and 0.35 increased dry matter yield and plant height of the two evaluated sorghum hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1216 · show in text ↑
t0

“FORAGE SORGHUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–26 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Volumax had more crude protein.

Taxon
FORAGE SORGHUMt0
Material
Volumaxe0
Outcome
crude protein contente0
Direction
moree0

Verbatim

e0

“The Volumax hybrid presented more crude protein content and acid detergent fiber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1298 · show in text ↑
t0

“FORAGE SORGHUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–26 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Volumax had more acid detergent fiber than BRS-655.

Taxon
FORAGE SORGHUMt0
Material
Volumaxe0
Outcome
acid detergent fibere0
Direction
moree0

Verbatim

e0

“The Volumax hybrid presented more crude protein content and acid detergent fiber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1298 · show in text ↑
t0

“FORAGE SORGHUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FSWA treatments did not change chemical-bromatological composition of the sorghum hybrids.

Taxon
FORAGE SORGHUMt0
Treatment
FSWAe0
Outcome
chemical-bromatological compositione0
Direction
did not changee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The evaluated FSWA did not change the chemical-bromatological composition of the sorghum hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1300–1396 · show in text ↑
t0

“FORAGE SORGHUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–26 · show in text ↑

soil water · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

soil water · growth · SorghumPositive and negative results

13 papers: 7 positive, 6 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

soil water · quality: general · SorghumResults agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.