Paper · 2020 · Industrial Crops and Products

Canola-quality white mustard: Agronomic management and seed yield

Krzysztof J. Jankowski; Dariusz Załuski; Mateusz Sokólski

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
22
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Modern white mustard (Sinapis alba L.) cultivars have high concentrations of erucic acid and glucosinolates. The progress in the breeding and cultivation of oilseed crops has contributed to the development of canola-quality white mustard, a variety without erucic acid and with low glucosinolate content, which was released for commercial production in 2012. The introduction of a new variety of white mustard could require partial or complete modification of the relevant production technology. The agricultural requirements of new crop cultivars can be rapidly assessed in experiments with fractional factorial design. In 2016–2018, a field experiment with mixed 2m3k−1 factorial design, where five factors were tested at two and three levels, was carried out in the Agricultural Experiment Station in Bałcyny in north-eastern Poland. Two white mustard cultivars, including the traditional cultivar Radena and the canola-quality cultivar Warta, were sown on three dates: the optimal date (4–10 April), as well as 7 and 14 days past the optimal date. White mustard cultivars were grown at three levels of agricultural inputs (0, 1, 2) with different rates of nitrogen (80, 120 and 160 kg ha-1), sulfur (0, 20 and 40 kg ha-1) and boron fertilizers (0, 150 and 300 g ha-1). The yields of the traditional cultivar exceeded those of the canola-quality cultivar by 0.53 Mg ha-1 on average. Both cultivars produced the highest yields when sown on the optimal date. Delayed sowing (by 7 and 14 days) contributed to the greatest decrease in yield (32 % and 42 %, respectively) in a dry year (2018). The traditional cultivar was more sensitive to delayed sowing than the canola-quality cultivar. In both analyzed cultivars, nitrogen fertilizer delivered yield-forming effects up to the rate of 80 kg ha-1 (in the dry year) or 120 kg ha-1 (in the year with above-average precipitation, 2016–2017). In both cultivars, a significant increase in seed yield was observed in response to 20 kg S ha-1. Foliar application of boron fertilizer did not increase white mustard yields.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Radena outyielded Warta by 0.53 Mg ha-1 on average.

Taxon
white mustardSinapis albat0
Material
Radenae1
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
exceedede0
Value
0.53 Mg ha-1e0
Comparator
Wartae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sinapis alba
Sinapis alba · TaxonAriel Palmon · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yields of the traditional cultivar exceeded those of the canola-quality cultivar by 0.53 Mg ha-1 on average.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1273–1385 · show in text ↑
e1

“traditional cultivar Radena and the canola-quality cultivar Warta”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–945 · show in text ↑
t0

“white mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both cultivars yielded most when sown on the optimal date.

Taxon
white mustardSinapis albat0
Treatment
optimal datee0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sinapis alba
Sinapis alba · TaxonAriel Palmon · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both cultivars produced the highest yields when sown on the optimal date.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1386–1459 · show in text ↑
t0

“white mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seven-day sowing delay reduced yield by 32% in dry 2018.

Taxon
white mustardSinapis albat0
Treatment
7e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
32 %e0
Qualifier
in a dry year (2018)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sinapis alba
Sinapis alba · TaxonAriel Palmon · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Delayed sowing (by 7 and 14 days) contributed to the greatest decrease in yield (32 % and 42 %, respectively) in a dry year (2018).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1460–1591 · show in text ↑
t0

“white mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fourteen-day sowing delay reduced yield by 42% in dry 2018.

Taxon
white mustardSinapis albat0
Treatment
14 dayse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
42 %e0
Qualifier
in a dry year (2018)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sinapis alba
Sinapis alba · TaxonAriel Palmon · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Delayed sowing (by 7 and 14 days) contributed to the greatest decrease in yield (32 % and 42 %, respectively) in a dry year (2018).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1460–1591 · show in text ↑
t0

“white mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–28 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The traditional cultivar was more sensitive to delayed sowing than the canola-quality cultivar.

Taxon
white mustardSinapis albat0
Material
Radenae1
Outcome
sensitive to delayed sowinge0
Direction
more sensitivee0
Comparator
Wartae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sinapis alba
Sinapis alba · TaxonAriel Palmon · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The traditional cultivar was more sensitive to delayed sowing than the canola-quality cultivar.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1592–1687 · show in text ↑
e1

“traditional cultivar Radena and the canola-quality cultivar Warta”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–945 · show in text ↑
t0

“white mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen yield response extended to 80 kg ha-1 in the dry year.

Taxon
white mustardSinapis albat0
Treatment
nitrogen fertilizere0
Outcome
yield-forming effectse0
Value
80 kg ha-1e0
Qualifier
in the dry yeare0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sinapis alba
Sinapis alba · TaxonAriel Palmon · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nitrogen fertilizer delivered yield-forming effects up to the rate of 80 kg ha-1 (in the dry year) or 120 kg ha-1 (in the year with above-average precipitation, 2016–2017).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1716–1888 · show in text ↑
t0

“white mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen yield response extended to 120 kg ha-1 in wetter 2016–2017.

Taxon
white mustardSinapis albat0
Treatment
nitrogen fertilizere0
Outcome
yield-forming effectse0
Value
120 kg ha-1e0
Qualifier
in the year with above-average precipitation, 2016–2017e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sinapis alba
Sinapis alba · TaxonAriel Palmon · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nitrogen fertilizer delivered yield-forming effects up to the rate of 80 kg ha-1 (in the dry year) or 120 kg ha-1 (in the year with above-average precipitation, 2016–2017).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1716–1888 · show in text ↑
t0

“white mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

20 kg S ha-1 significantly increased seed yield in both cultivars.

Taxon
white mustardSinapis albat0
Treatment
20 kg S ha-1e0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sinapis alba
Sinapis alba · TaxonAriel Palmon · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In both cultivars, a significant increase in seed yield was observed in response to 20 kg S ha-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1889–1986 · show in text ↑
t0

“white mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar boron did not increase white mustard yields.

Taxon
white mustardSinapis albae0
Treatment
Foliar application of boron fertilizere0
Outcome
white mustard yieldse0
Direction
did not increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sinapis alba
Sinapis alba · TaxonAriel Palmon · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar application of boron fertilizer did not increase white mustard yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1987–2064 · show in text ↑

boron atom · yield · Sinapis alba (white mustard)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

application · yield · Sinapis alba (white mustard)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

fertilization · yield · Sinapis alba (white mustard)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 15 positive, 1 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.