Paper · 2020 · Functional Plant Biology

The effect of zinc fertilisation and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on grain quality and yield of contrasting barley cultivars

Ahmed A. Al Mutairi; Timothy R. Cavagnaro; Shi Fang Khor; et al.

12
claims
12
verbatim quotes
26
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Zinc is essential for the functioning of many enzymes and plant processes and the malting process. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) can improve zinc (Zn) uptake in the important cereal crop barley (Hordeum vulgare) on Zn-deficient soils. Here we investigated the impacts of Zn fertilisation and AMF on the yield and grain quality of malting barley cultivars. Five barley genotypes were inoculated or not with the AMF Rhizophagus irregularis, and grown in pots either fertilised with Zn or not. Measurements of Zn nutrition and yield were made for all cultivars. Further analyses of grain biochemical composition, including starch, β-glucan and arabinoxylan contents, and analysis of ATR-MIR spectra were made in two contrasting cultivars. Mycorrhizal colonisation generally resulted in decreased biomass, but increased grain dimensions and mean grain weight. Barley grain yield and biochemical qualities were highly variable between cultivars, and the ATR-MIR spectra revealed grain compositional differences between cultivars and AMF treatments. Mycorrhizal fungi can affect barley grain Zn concentration and starch content, but grain biochemical traits including β-glucan and arabinoxylan contents were more conserved by the cultivar, and unaffected by AMF inoculation. The ATR-MIR spectra revealed that there are other grain characteristics affected by AMF that remain to be elucidated.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal colonisation generally decreased barley biomass.

Treatment
Mycorrhizal colonisatione0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Mycorrhizal colonisation generally resulted in decreased biomass, but increased grain dimensions and mean grain weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–860 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal colonisation increased barley grain dimensions.

Treatment
Mycorrhizal colonisatione0
Outcome
grain dimensionse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Mycorrhizal colonisation generally resulted in decreased biomass, but increased grain dimensions and mean grain weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–860 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal colonisation increased mean barley grain weight.

Treatment
Mycorrhizal colonisatione0
Outcome
mean grain weighte0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Mycorrhizal colonisation generally resulted in decreased biomass, but increased grain dimensions and mean grain weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–860 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barley grain yield varied greatly across cultivars.

Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highly variablee0
Comparator
cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Barley grain yield and biochemical qualities were highly variable between cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–944 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barley grain biochemical qualities varied greatly across cultivars.

Outcome
biochemical qualitiese0
Direction
highly variablee0
Comparator
cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Barley grain yield and biochemical qualities were highly variable between cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–944 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ATR-MIR spectra showed grain composition differences between cultivars.

Outcome
grain compositional differencese0
Comparator
cultivarse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the ATR-MIR spectra revealed grain compositional differences between cultivars and AMF treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1048 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ATR-MIR spectra showed grain composition differences between AMF treatments.

Outcome
grain compositional differencese0
Comparator
AMF treatmentse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the ATR-MIR spectra revealed grain compositional differences between cultivars and AMF treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1048 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal fungi affected barley grain zinc concentration.

Treatment
Mycorrhizal fungie0
Outcome
grain Zn concentratione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mycorrhizal fungi can affect barley grain Zn concentration and starch content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal fungi affected barley grain starch content.

Treatment
Mycorrhizal fungie0
Outcome
starch contente0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mycorrhizal fungi can affect barley grain Zn concentration and starch content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barley β-glucan content was conserved across cultivar and unaffected by AMF.

Treatment
AMF inoculatione0
Outcome
β-glucane0
Direction
unaffectede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“grain biochemical traits including β-glucan and arabinoxylan contents were more conserved by the cultivar, and unaffected by AMF inoculation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1273 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barley arabinoxylan content was conserved across cultivar and unaffected by AMF.

Treatment
AMF inoculatione0
Outcome
arabinoxylan contentse0
Direction
unaffectede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“grain biochemical traits including β-glucan and arabinoxylan contents were more conserved by the cultivar, and unaffected by AMF inoculation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1273 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ATR-MIR spectra indicated additional AMF-sensitive grain characteristics.

Outcome
other grain characteristics affected by AMFe0
Comparator
AMFe0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The ATR-MIR spectra revealed that there are other grain characteristics affected by AMF that remain to be elucidated.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1274–1391 · show in text ↑

mycorrhiza · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results differ

23 papers: 22 positive, 1 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

mycorrhiza · molecular: metabolites · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

mycorrhiza · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 12 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

inoculation · molecular: metabolites · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 26 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.