Paper · 2020 · China Agricultural Economic Review

Determinants and overuse of pesticides in grain production

Shengyang Sun; Chao Zhang; Ruifa Hu

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
42
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Purpose The negative externalities of pesticide overuse increasingly concern the public. However, little empirical evidence has been provided for pesticide overuse and the relationship between the governmental agricultural extension system reforms and pesticide use in grain production from a nationwide perspective. The purpose of this paper is to estimate the productive effect and overuse of pesticides, and it also investigates the effect of the governmental agricultural extension system reforms on pesticide expenditure in rice, maize and wheat production in China. Design/methodology/approach A two-equation system model consisting of an exponential-specific damage-control production function and a pesticide use function is applied to the provincial-level data during the period 1985–2016. Findings While pesticide expenditure significantly increases grain productivity, the actual pesticide expenditure exceeds the economically optimal level. The commercialization reform of the governmental agricultural extension system contributed to the increase in pesticide expenditure. Moreover, the de-commercialization reform of the governmental agricultural extension system plays a limited role in pesticide reduction. Price fluctuations for grain and pesticide also impose significant effects on pesticide expenditure. Originality/value This study has two important policy implications for pesticide reduction in China. It is urgent to specify the functions of the governmental agricultural extension system, and encourage the development of the socialized agricultural technology service. More efforts should also be made to remove the bureaucratic intervention on the pricing mechanism of grain product and pesticide.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pesticide expenditure significantly increases grain productivity in rice, maize and wheat production in China.

Taxon
rice, maize and wheatOryza sativaTriticum aestivumZea mayse1
Treatment
pesticide expendituree2
Outcome
grain productivitye2
Direction
increasese2
Setting
Chinae1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“in rice, maize and wheat production in China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–570 · show in text ↑
e2

“While pesticide expenditure significantly increases grain productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 808–878 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Actual pesticide expenditure exceeds the economically optimal level.

Taxon
rice, maize and wheatOryza sativaTriticum aestivumZea mayse1
Outcome
pesticide expendituree3
Direction
exceedse3
Comparator
economically optimal levele3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“in rice, maize and wheat production in China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–570 · show in text ↑
e3

“the actual pesticide expenditure exceeds the economically optimal level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–951 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The commercialization reform of the agricultural extension system contributed to an increase in pesticide expenditure.

Taxon
rice, maize and wheatOryza sativaTriticum aestivumZea mayse1
Treatment
commercialization reform of the governmental agricultural extension systeme4
Outcome
pesticide expendituree4
Direction
increasee4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“in rice, maize and wheat production in China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–570 · show in text ↑
e4

“The commercialization reform of the governmental agricultural extension system contributed to the increase in pesticide expenditure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1084 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The de-commercialization reform of the extension system plays a limited role in reducing pesticide use.

Taxon
rice, maize and wheatOryza sativaTriticum aestivumZea mayse1
Treatment
de-commercialization reform of the governmental agricultural extension systeme5
Outcome
pesticide reductione5
Qualifier
limited rolee5

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“in rice, maize and wheat production in China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–570 · show in text ↑
e5

“the de-commercialization reform of the governmental agricultural extension system plays a limited role in pesticide reduction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1221 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Price fluctuations for grain and pesticide have significant effects on pesticide expenditure.

Taxon
rice, maize and wheatOryza sativaTriticum aestivumZea mayse1
Treatment
Price fluctuations for grain and pesticidee6
Outcome
pesticide expendituree6

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“in rice, maize and wheat production in China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–570 · show in text ↑
e6

“Price fluctuations for grain and pesticide also impose significant effects on pesticide expenditure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1223–1322 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors recommend specifying the functions of the agricultural extension system and encouraging socialized technology services.

Taxon
rice, maize and wheatOryza sativaTriticum aestivumZea mayse1
Outcome
specify the functions of the governmental agricultural extension systeme7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“in rice, maize and wheat production in China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–570 · show in text ↑
e7

“It is urgent to specify the functions of the governmental agricultural extension system, and encourage the development of the socialized agricultural technology service”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1425–1593 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors recommend removing bureaucratic intervention in grain and pesticide pricing.

Taxon
rice, maize and wheatOryza sativaTriticum aestivumZea mayse1
Outcome
remove the bureaucratic intervention on the pricing mechanism of grain product and pesticidee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“in rice, maize and wheat production in China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–570 · show in text ↑
e2

“More efforts should also be made to remove the bureaucratic intervention on the pricing mechanism of grain product and pesticide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1595–1723 · show in text ↑

insecticide · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

60 papers: 50 positive, 10 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

56 papers more in this group

See all 60 papers →

insecticide · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

66 papers: 50 positive, 16 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

insecticide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

69 papers: 51 positive, 18 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.