Abstract
This study was conducted to find out the effect of rainfall time on growth and seed quality in safflower. Rainfall was done artificially and the treatment of rainfall time was divided into 6 parts. Each rainfall treatment was done from the first day of flowering up to the fifth day after flowering, from sixth day after flowering to the tenth day after flowering, from the eleventh day after flowering to the fifteenth day after flowering, from sixteenth day after flowering to twentith day after flowering, from the twenty first day after flowering to the twenty fifth day after flowering and from twenty sixth day after flowering to thirtith day after flowering. Rainfall time after flowering did not affect disease occurrence on the upper part and flower bud of safflower, which were infected at were 3.3 and 1, respectively. Ripened grain found on the main stem and primary branch was 37.4% and 65.0% at first day to the fifth day and sixth day to the tenth day rainfall periods after flowering, respectively. Yield was decreased by 14% in the sixth day up to the tenth day and eleventh day up to the fifteenth day rainfall periods (282-281kg/10a) compared to the one under control (327kg/10a). Hunter's L value was 73.5 and 69.9 in twenty first up to the twenty fifth day and twenty sixth up to the thirtith day rainfall periods after flowering, which decreased significantly to 79.3 under non-rainfall period. Therefore, it can be concluded that the optimum harvest time is twenty fifth day after flowering to maintain seed quality at rainfall time and before harvesting period.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Rainfall in the sixth to fifteenth day periods after flowering reduced safflower yield by 14% relative to the control.
- Taxon
- Safflower
Carthamus tinctoriust0 - Treatment
- rainfalle1
- Outcome
- Yielde1
- Direction
- decreasede1
- Value
- 14%e1
- Qualifier
- 282-281kg/10ae1
- Comparator
- controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.)”
e1“Yield was decreased by 14% in the sixth day up to the tenth day and eleventh day up to the fifteenth day rainfall periods (282-281kg/10a) compared to the one under control (327kg/10a)”
Claim · model-written summary
Hunter's L value was 73.5 in the rainfall period from 21 to 25 days after flowering and decreased significantly from 79.3 under non-rainfall.
- Taxon
- SafflowerCarthamus tinctoriust0
- Treatment
- twenty first up to the twenty fifth daye2
- Outcome
- Hunter's L valuee2
- Direction
- decreasede2
- Value
- 73.5e2
- Qualifier
- 79.3e2
- Comparator
- non-rainfall periode2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.)”
e2“Hunter's L value was 73.5 and 69.9 in twenty first up to the twenty fifth day and twenty sixth up to the thirtith day rainfall periods after flowering, which decreased significantly to 79.3 under non-rainfall period”
Claim · model-written summary
Hunter's L value was 69.9 in the rainfall period from 26 to 30 days after flowering and decreased significantly from 79.3 under non-rainfall.
- Taxon
- SafflowerCarthamus tinctoriust0
- Treatment
- twenty sixth up to the thirtith daye2
- Outcome
- Hunter's L valuee2
- Direction
- decreasede2
- Value
- 69.9e2
- Qualifier
- 79.3e2
- Comparator
- non-rainfall periode2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.)”
e2“Hunter's L value was 73.5 and 69.9 in twenty first up to the twenty fifth day and twenty sixth up to the thirtith day rainfall periods after flowering, which decreased significantly to 79.3 under non-rainfall period”
Claim · model-written summary
Ripened grain on the main stem and primary branch was 37.4% in the rainfall periods from the first to the fifth day after flowering.
- Taxon
- SafflowerCarthamus tinctoriust0
- Organ / stage
- main stem and primary branche3
- Treatment
- first day to the fifth daye3
- Outcome
- Ripened graine3
- Value
- 37.4%e3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.)”
e3“Ripened grain found on the main stem and primary branch was 37.4% and 65.0% at first day to the fifth day and sixth day to the tenth day rainfall periods after flowering”
Claim · model-written summary
Ripened grain on the main stem and primary branch was 65.0% in the rainfall periods from the sixth to the tenth day after flowering.
- Taxon
- SafflowerCarthamus tinctoriust0
- Organ / stage
- main stem and primary branche3
- Treatment
- sixth day to the tenth daye3
- Outcome
- Ripened graine3
- Value
- 65.0%e3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.)”
e3“Ripened grain found on the main stem and primary branch was 37.4% and 65.0% at first day to the fifth day and sixth day to the tenth day rainfall periods after flowering”
Claim · model-written summary
Rainfall time after flowering did not affect disease occurrence on the upper part of safflower (3.3).
- Taxon
- SafflowerCarthamus tinctoriust0
- Organ / stage
- upper parte4
- Treatment
- Rainfall time after floweringe4
- Outcome
- disease occurrencee4
- Direction
- did not affecte4
- Value
- 3.3e4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.)”
e4“Rainfall time after flowering did not affect disease occurrence on the upper part and flower bud of safflower, which were infected at were 3.3 and 1, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Rainfall time after flowering did not affect disease occurrence on the flower bud of safflower (1).
- Taxon
- SafflowerCarthamus tinctoriust0
- Organ / stage
- flower bude4
- Treatment
- Rainfall time after floweringe4
- Outcome
- disease occurrencee4
- Direction
- did not affecte4
- Value
- 1e4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.)”
e4“Rainfall time after flowering did not affect disease occurrence on the upper part and flower bud of safflower, which were infected at were 3.3 and 1, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
The optimum harvest time for safflower is the twenty fifth day after flowering to maintain seed quality.
- Taxon
- SafflowerCarthamus tinctoriust0
- Outcome
- optimum harvest timee5
- Qualifier
- maintain seed qualitye5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.)”
e5“the optimum harvest time is twenty fifth day after flowering to maintain seed quality”
The same questions in other papers
rainfall · yield · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.