Paper · 2023 · Journal of Plant Protection Research

Chemical control of broadleaf weed sin autumn-sown rainfed chickpea

Veisi, Mozhgan; Mansouri, Mohammad Saleh; Ghiasvand, Mohsen

11
claims
19
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Weed control is the most important constraint of autumn-sown chickpea production. Field experiments were conducted at three sites to evaluate the yield response of autumn-sown rainfed chickpea and weed control with PRE pendimethalin, POST pyridate, PRE isoxaflutole, preemergence (PRE) and postemergence (POST) of imazethapyr through hand-weeded, untreated and weed free checks. The results showed that pyridate was the safest option for weed control in chickpea. The highest grain yield of chickpea was obtained with application of pyridate followed by isoxaflutolein three sites. Imazethapyr and metribuzin caused higher visual injuries than the other treatments. Furthermore, the applications of pyridate, isoxaflutole, metribuzin, and pendimethalin, as well as PRE and POST imazethapyr were found to reduce the total weed densities (averaged for three locations) by as much as 76, 75, 75.4, 43, 64, and 64.5% within 30 days after treatments, respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pyridate was the safest weed control option for chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
pyridatee0
Outcome
safest option for weed controle0
Direction
safeste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pyridate was the safest option for weed control in chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 403–462 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pyridate produced the highest chickpea grain yield.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
pyridatee0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
isoxaflutolee0
Setting
three sitese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest grain yield of chickpea was obtained with application of pyridate followed by isoxaflutolein three sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–580 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Isoxaflutole ranked after pyridate for chickpea grain yield.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
isoxaflutolee0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
followed bye0
Comparator
pyridatee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest grain yield of chickpea was obtained with application of pyridate followed by isoxaflutolein three sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–580 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazethapyr caused higher visual injury than other treatments.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Imazethapyre0
Outcome
visual injuriese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Imazethapyr and metribuzin caused higher visual injuries than the other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–664 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metribuzin caused higher visual injury than other treatments.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
metribuzine0
Outcome
visual injuriese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Imazethapyr and metribuzin caused higher visual injuries than the other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–664 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pyridate reduced total weed density by 76%.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
pyridatee0
Outcome
total weed densitiese0
Direction
reducee0
Value
76e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pyridate, isoxaflutole, metribuzin, and pendimethalin, as well as PRE and POST imazethapyr were found to reduce the total weed densities (averaged for three locations) by as much as 76, 75, 75.4, 43, 64, and 64.5% within 30 days after treatments, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–958 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Isoxaflutole reduced total weed density by 75%.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
isoxaflutolee0
Outcome
total weed densitiese0
Direction
reducee0
Value
75e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pyridate, isoxaflutole, metribuzin, and pendimethalin, as well as PRE and POST imazethapyr were found to reduce the total weed densities (averaged for three locations) by as much as 76, 75, 75.4, 43, 64, and 64.5% within 30 days after treatments, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–958 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metribuzin reduced total weed density by 75.4%.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
metribuzine0
Outcome
total weed densitiese0
Direction
reducee0
Value
75.4e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pyridate, isoxaflutole, metribuzin, and pendimethalin, as well as PRE and POST imazethapyr were found to reduce the total weed densities (averaged for three locations) by as much as 76, 75, 75.4, 43, 64, and 64.5% within 30 days after treatments, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–958 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin reduced total weed density by 43%.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
pendimethaline0
Outcome
total weed densitiese0
Direction
reducee0
Value
43e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pyridate, isoxaflutole, metribuzin, and pendimethalin, as well as PRE and POST imazethapyr were found to reduce the total weed densities (averaged for three locations) by as much as 76, 75, 75.4, 43, 64, and 64.5% within 30 days after treatments, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–958 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PRE imazethapyr reduced total weed density by 64%.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
PRE and POST imazethapyre0
Outcome
total weed densitiese0
Direction
reducee0
Value
64e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pyridate, isoxaflutole, metribuzin, and pendimethalin, as well as PRE and POST imazethapyr were found to reduce the total weed densities (averaged for three locations) by as much as 76, 75, 75.4, 43, 64, and 64.5% within 30 days after treatments, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–958 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

POST imazethapyr reduced total weed density by 64.5%.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
PRE and POST imazethapyre0
Outcome
total weed densitiese0
Direction
reducee0
Value
64.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pyridate, isoxaflutole, metribuzin, and pendimethalin, as well as PRE and POST imazethapyr were found to reduce the total weed densities (averaged for three locations) by as much as 76, 75, 75.4, 43, 64, and 64.5% within 30 days after treatments, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–958 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–67 · show in text ↑

Pyridate · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

Imazethapyr · weed · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 22 positive, 2 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

isoxaflutole · weed · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

metribuzin · crop injury · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

metribuzin · weed · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Imazethapyr · crop injury · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

6 papers: 0 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Pyridate · weed · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

pendimethalin · weed · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

49 papers: 49 positive, 0 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.