Paper · 2019 · Horticultural Research (Japan)

Effects of R/FR Ratio of Light Source for Flowering Inhibition via Night-Break in Chrysanthemum

Ryuji Hakuzan; Kimie Kido; Hiroshi Kirihara

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The relationship between red/far-red ratio (R/FR ratio) of LED chips and flowering inhibition, by LED light sources with the same power consumption, was evaluated using two cultivars of chrysanthemum, the autumn flowering ‘Jimba’ and summer-to-autumn flowering ‘Iwano-hakusen’. The combinations of light intensity of the R and FR LED chips emitting at wavelengths of 632 nm and 734 nm, respectively, were set as 5 : 0, 4 : 1, 3 : 2, 2 : 3, 1 : 4, and 0 : 5. The six LED light bulbs were divided into short- and long-term lighting to detect differences in the effects of flowering inhibition due to differences in light quality. The long- and short-term lighting treatments were set at 4 h and 30 min, respectively, for ‘Iwano-hakusen’ and 2 h and 4 min, respectively, for ‘Jimba’. In the short-term lighting treatment, a high flowering inhibitory effect was obtained with the R5:FR0 chip combination in both cultivars. In long-term lighting treatment, the responses to light quality differed between the cultivars: flowering inhibition in ‘Iwano-hakusen’ was highly effective at R3:FR2 and R2:FR3; however, in ‘Jimba’ a marked inhibitory effect was obtained at R5:FR0. Long-term lighting by R + FR light resulted in a high flowering inhibitory effect in ‘Iwano-hakusen’. This suggested the involvement of high irradiation response via the phytochrome phyA.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Short-term R5:FR0 lighting strongly inhibited flowering in both cultivars.

Taxon
ChrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
R5:FR0 chip combinatione0
Outcome
flowering inhibitory effecte0
Direction
highe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the short-term lighting treatment, a high flowering inhibitory effect was obtained with the R5:FR0 chip combination in both cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–917 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chrysanthemum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Long-term R3:FR2 lighting strongly inhibited flowering in Iwano-hakusen.

Taxon
ChrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Material
Iwano-hakusene0
Treatment
R3:FR2e0
Outcome
flowering inhibitione0
Direction
highly effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“flowering inhibition in ‘Iwano-hakusen’ was highly effective at R3:FR2 and R2:FR3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1096 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chrysanthemum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Long-term R2:FR3 lighting strongly inhibited flowering in Iwano-hakusen.

Taxon
ChrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Material
Iwano-hakusene0
Treatment
R2:FR3e0
Outcome
flowering inhibitione0
Direction
highly effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“flowering inhibition in ‘Iwano-hakusen’ was highly effective at R3:FR2 and R2:FR3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1096 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chrysanthemum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Long-term R5:FR0 lighting markedly inhibited flowering in Jimba.

Taxon
ChrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Material
Jimbae0
Treatment
R5:FR0e0
Outcome
inhibitory effecte0
Direction
markede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in ‘Jimba’ a marked inhibitory effect was obtained at R5:FR0”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1167 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chrysanthemum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Long-term combined R and FR light strongly inhibited flowering in Iwano-hakusen.

Taxon
ChrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Material
Iwano-hakusene0
Treatment
R + FR lighte0
Outcome
flowering inhibitory effecte0
Direction
highe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Long-term lighting by R + FR light resulted in a high flowering inhibitory effect in ‘Iwano-hakusen’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1169–1269 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chrysanthemum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–95 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest that phyA high irradiation response is involved in this flowering inhibition.

Taxon
ChrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Gene
phytochrome phyAe0
Outcome
high irradiation responsee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This suggested the involvement of high irradiation response via the phytochrome phyA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1271–1355 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chrysanthemum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–95 · show in text ↑

light · phenology · ChrysanthemumResults differ

28 papers: 22 positive, 6 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.