Paper · 2020 · Journal of Integrative Agriculture

Effects of reduced nitrogen and suitable soil moisture on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) rhizosphere soil microbiological, biochemical properties and yield in the Huanghuai Plain, China

Su-mei ZHOU; Man ZHANG; Ke-ke ZHANG; et al.

12
claims
21
verbatim quotes
40
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Soil management practices affect rhizosphere microorganisms and enzyme activities, which in turn influence soil ecosystem processes. The objective of this study was to explore the effects of different nitrogen application rates on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) rhizosphere soil microorganisms and enzyme activities, and their temporal variations in relation to soil fertility under supplemental irrigation conditions in a fluvo-aquic region. For this, we established a split-plot experiment for two consecutive years (2014–2015 and 2015–2016) in the field with three levels of soil moisture: water deficit to no irrigation (W1), medium irrigation to (70±5)% of soil relative moisture after jointing stage (W2), and adequate irrigation to (80±5)% of soil relative moisture after jointing stage (W3); and three levels of nitrogen: 0 kg ha−1 (N1), 195 kg ha−1 (N2) and 270 kg ha−1 (N3). Results showed that irrigation and nitrogen application significantly increased rhizosphere microorganisms and enzyme activities. Soil microbiological properties showed different trends in response to N level; the highest values of bacteria, protease, catalase and phosphatase appeared in N2, while the highest levels of actinobacteria, fungi and urease were observed in N3. In addition, these items performed best under medium irrigation (W2) relative to W1 and W3; particularly the maximum microorganism (bacteria, actinobacteria and fungi) amounts appeared at W2, 5.37×107 and 6.35×107 CFUs g−1 higher than those at W3 in 2014–2015 and 2015–2016, respectively; and these changes were similar in both growing seasons. Microbe-related parameters fluctuated over time but their seasonality did not hamper the irrigation and fertilization-induced effects. Further, the highest grain yields of 13 309.2 and 12 885.7 kg ha−1 were both obtained at W2N2 in 2014–2015 and 2015–2016, respectively. The selected properties, soil microorganisms and enzymes, were significantly correlated with wheat yield and proved to be valuable indicators of soil quality. These results clearly demonstrated that the combined treatment (W2N2) significantly improved soil microbiological properties, soil fertility and wheat yield on the Huanghuai Plain, China.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation and nitrogen application increased rhizosphere microorganisms and enzyme activities.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
irrigation and nitrogen applicatione0
Outcome
rhizosphere microorganisms and enzyme activitiese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irrigation and nitrogen application significantly increased rhizosphere microorganisms and enzyme activities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–1011 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–86 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacteria, protease, catalase and phosphatase had their highest values under N2.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
N2e0
Outcome
highest values of bacteria, protease, catalase and phosphatasee0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest values of bacteria, protease, catalase and phosphatase appeared in N2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1174 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–86 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Actinobacteria, fungi and urease had their highest levels under N3.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
N3e0
Outcome
highest levels of actinobacteria, fungi and ureasee0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest levels of actinobacteria, fungi and urease were observed in N3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1182–1256 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil microbiological and enzyme properties performed best under W2 compared with W1 and W3.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
medium irrigation (W2)e0
Outcome
performed beste0
Direction
beste0
Comparator
W1 and W3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“these items performed best under medium irrigation (W2) relative to W1 and W3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1271–1348 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At W2, microorganism amounts exceeded W3 by 5.37×107 CFUs g−1 in 2014–2015.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
W2e0
Outcome
microorganism (bacteria, actinobacteria and fungi) amountse0
Direction
highere0
Value
5.37×107e0
Qualifier
2014–2015e0
Comparator
W3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum microorganism (bacteria, actinobacteria and fungi) amounts appeared at W2, 5.37×107 and 6.35×107 CFUs g−1 higher than those at W3 in 2014–2015 and 2015–2016, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1367–1545 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At W2, microorganism amounts exceeded W3 by 6.35×107 CFUs g−1 in 2015–2016.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
W2e0
Outcome
microorganism (bacteria, actinobacteria and fungi) amountse0
Direction
highere0
Value
6.35×107 CFUs g−1e0
Qualifier
2015–2016e0
Comparator
W3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum microorganism (bacteria, actinobacteria and fungi) amounts appeared at W2, 5.37×107 and 6.35×107 CFUs g−1 higher than those at W3 in 2014–2015 and 2015–2016, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1367–1545 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–86 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microbe-related parameters fluctuated over time, with comparable changes in both seasons.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Outcome
Microbe-related parameters fluctuated over timee0
Qualifier
similar in both growing seasonse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“these changes were similar in both growing seasons. Microbe-related parameters fluctuated over time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1551–1650 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–86 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

W2N2 produced the highest grain yield of 13 309.2 kg ha−1 in 2014–2015.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
W2N2e0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
13 309.2e0
Qualifier
2014–2015e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest grain yields of 13 309.2 and 12 885.7 kg ha−1 were both obtained at W2N2 in 2014–2015 and 2015–2016, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1751–1872 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–86 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

W2N2 produced the highest grain yield of 12 885.7 kg ha−1 in 2015–2016.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
W2N2e0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
12 885.7 kg ha−1e0
Qualifier
2015–2016e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest grain yields of 13 309.2 and 12 885.7 kg ha−1 were both obtained at W2N2 in 2014–2015 and 2015–2016, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1751–1872 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–86 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil microorganisms and enzymes were significantly correlated with wheat yield.

Outcome
wheat yielde0
Qualifier
soil microorganisms and enzymese0

Not reportedInteractorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil microorganisms and enzymes, were significantly correlated with wheat yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1899–1978 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The soil microorganisms and enzymes were considered valuable soil-quality indicators.

Outcome
valuable indicators of soil qualitye0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil microorganisms and enzymes, were significantly correlated with wheat yield and proved to be valuable indicators of soil quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1899–2031 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

W2N2 significantly improved soil microbiological properties, fertility and wheat yield.

Treatment
combined treatment (W2N2)e0
Outcome
soil microbiological properties, soil fertility and wheat yielde0
Direction
improvede0
Setting
Huanghuai Plain, Chinae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combined treatment (W2N2) significantly improved soil microbiological properties, soil fertility and wheat yield on the Huanghuai Plain, China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2077–2219 · show in text ↑

irrigation · soil: biology · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

nitrogen · soil: biology · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 23 positive, 6 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.