Paper · 2019 · Current Agriculture Research Journal

Effect of Nitrogen and Phosphorus on Growth, Flowering and Yield of Cut Chrysanthemum cv. Thai Chen Queen

Kitty Rajan; Dipal S. Bhatt; S. L. Chawla; et al.

4
claims
7
verbatim quotes
14
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

An investigation was carried out to study the effect of nitrogen and phosphorus on growth, flowering and yield of cut chrysanthemum cv. Thai Chen Queen. The experiment was laid out in randomized block design (RBD) with factorial concept comprising of twelve treatment combinations with four levels of nitrogen, viz., 100 kg N/ha (N1), 150 kg N/ha (N2), 200 kg N/ha (N3) and 250 kg N/ha (N4) and three levels of phosphorus, viz., 50 kg P2O5/ha (P1), 75 kg P2O5/ha (P2) and 100 kg P2O5/ha (P3). The treatments were replicated four times. The results indicated that application of 200 kg N/ha (N3) to cut chrysanthemum was most effective to increase plant height whereas, plants receiving 150 kg N/ha significantly improved vegetative growth as well as quality and yield of flowers. Application of 75 kg P2O5/ha was found promising for growth, quality as well as yield parameters.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

200 kg N/ha most increased plant height in cut chrysanthemum.

Taxon
cut chrysanthemume0
Treatment
200 kg N/hae0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“application of 200 kg N/ha (N3) to cut chrysanthemum was most effective to increase plant height”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–659 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

150 kg N/ha significantly improved vegetative growth in cut chrysanthemum.

Taxon
cut chrysanthemumt0
Treatment
150 kg N/hae0
Outcome
vegetative growthe0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“plants receiving 150 kg N/ha significantly improved vegetative growth as well as quality and yield of flowers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–778 · show in text ↑
t0

“cut Chrysanthemum”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 68–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

150 kg N/ha significantly improved flower quality and yield.

Taxon
cut chrysanthemumt0
Treatment
150 kg N/hae0
Outcome
quality and yield of flowerse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“plants receiving 150 kg N/ha significantly improved vegetative growth as well as quality and yield of flowers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–778 · show in text ↑
t0

“cut Chrysanthemum”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 68–85 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

75 kg P2O5/ha was promising for growth, quality and yield.

Taxon
cut chrysanthemumt0
Treatment
75 kg P2O5/hae0
Outcome
growth, quality as well as yield parameterse0

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 75 kg P2O5/ha was found promising for growth, quality as well as yield parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–876 · show in text ↑
t0

“cut Chrysanthemum”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 68–85 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · quality: general · ChrysanthemumPositive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

nitrogen · growth · ChrysanthemumPositive and negative results

21 papers: 15 positive, 6 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.