Abstract
This study is aimed to determine the effect of varying doses of humic acid and zinc applications on the N, P, K contents of chickpea plants in grain and stem components. In trials, 0 and 40 kg da-1 humic acid and 0, 2, 4 kg da-1 zinc doses were applied. The study was carried out in the research and application field of Van Yuzuncu Yil University, Faculty of Agriculture. The experiment was divided into divided plots according to the experimental design. As the basic fertilization, 5 kg da-1 nitrogen as ammonium sulfate and 6 kg da-1 phosphorus as TSP doses were applied. Before starting the experiments, soil textures, soil reaction, lime, organic matter, salt content, total nitrogen, phosphorus and useful potassium analyzes were made in the soils where the experiment will be carried out. In the light of the data obtained from the experiment, it was observed that humic acid and zinc doses increased the content of N and K in the chickpea plants in grain and stem components, while a decrease in the content of P was observed. However, the effect of different doses of humic acid and zinc on the N, P and K content of chickpea was statistically insignificant. As a result of the study, it was proposed to use 4 kg da-1 Zn dose and 40 kg da-1 humic acid application in chickpea cultivation for local conditions. Keywords : Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.), Zinc, Humic Acid, City of Van DOI : 10.7176/JSTR/5-6-09
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Humic acid doses increased chickpea N content, though the dose effects were statistically insignificant.
- Taxon
- Chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Organ / stage
- grain and stem componentse0
- Treatment
- humic acide0
- Outcome
- content of Ne0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Chickpea Plants”
e0“humic acid and zinc doses increased the content of N and K in the chickpea plants in grain and stem components, while a decrease in the content of P was observed.”
e1“the effect of different doses of humic acid and zinc on the N, P and K content of chickpea was statistically insignificant”
Claim · model-written summary
Zinc doses increased chickpea N content, though the dose effects were statistically insignificant.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Organ / stage
- grain and stem componentse0
- Treatment
- zinc dosese0
- Outcome
- content of Ne0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Chickpea Plants”
e0“humic acid and zinc doses increased the content of N and K in the chickpea plants in grain and stem components, while a decrease in the content of P was observed.”
e1“the effect of different doses of humic acid and zinc on the N, P and K content of chickpea was statistically insignificant”
Claim · model-written summary
Humic acid doses increased chickpea K content, though the dose effects were statistically insignificant.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Organ / stage
- grain and stem componentse0
- Treatment
- humic acide0
- Outcome
- Ke0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Chickpea Plants”
e0“humic acid and zinc doses increased the content of N and K in the chickpea plants in grain and stem components, while a decrease in the content of P was observed.”
e1“the effect of different doses of humic acid and zinc on the N, P and K content of chickpea was statistically insignificant”
Claim · model-written summary
Zinc doses increased chickpea K content, though the dose effects were statistically insignificant.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Organ / stage
- grain and stem componentse0
- Treatment
- zinc dosese0
- Outcome
- Ke0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Chickpea Plants”
e0“humic acid and zinc doses increased the content of N and K in the chickpea plants in grain and stem components, while a decrease in the content of P was observed.”
e1“the effect of different doses of humic acid and zinc on the N, P and K content of chickpea was statistically insignificant”
Claim · model-written summary
Humic acid doses decreased chickpea P content, though the dose effects were statistically insignificant.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Organ / stage
- grain and stem componentse0
- Treatment
- humic acide0
- Outcome
- content of Pe0
- Direction
- decreasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Chickpea Plants”
e0“humic acid and zinc doses increased the content of N and K in the chickpea plants in grain and stem components, while a decrease in the content of P was observed.”
e1“the effect of different doses of humic acid and zinc on the N, P and K content of chickpea was statistically insignificant”
Claim · model-written summary
Zinc doses decreased chickpea P content, though the dose effects were statistically insignificant.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Organ / stage
- grain and stem componentse0
- Treatment
- zinc dosese0
- Outcome
- content of Pe0
- Direction
- decreasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Chickpea Plants”
e0“humic acid and zinc doses increased the content of N and K in the chickpea plants in grain and stem components, while a decrease in the content of P was observed.”
e1“the effect of different doses of humic acid and zinc on the N, P and K content of chickpea was statistically insignificant”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend 4 kg da-1 zinc in local chickpea cultivation.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Outcome
- use 4 kg da-1 Zn dosee0
- Setting
- local conditionse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Chickpea Plants”
e0“it was proposed to use 4 kg da-1 Zn dose and 40 kg da-1 humic acid application in chickpea cultivation for local conditions”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend 40 kg da-1 humic acid in local chickpea cultivation.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Outcome
- 40 kg da-1 humic acid applicatione0
- Setting
- local conditionse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Chickpea Plants”
e0“it was proposed to use 4 kg da-1 Zn dose and 40 kg da-1 humic acid application in chickpea cultivation for local conditions”
The same questions in other papers
zinc atom · molecular: metabolites · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →zinc atom · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
32 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
29 papers more in this group
See all 33 papers →other · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
8 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.