Paper · 2015 · Annals of biological research

Application of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi to improve plant growth in Solanum melongena L.

Satya Vani Motha; Hindumathi Amballa; Narasimha Reddy Bhumi

16
claims
38
verbatim quotes
5
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The present study was conducted to study the effect of indigenous Glomus fasciculatum as bio-inoculant in three different cultivars viz., Jyothi, Ankur and Manjirigutta of brinjal to evaluate the potential effect of AM fungi on the extent of root colonization, plant growth parameters such as shoot and root lengths, their fresh and dry weights, biomass and dry matter production and N, P, K status in pot experimental conditions. The three selected cultivars of brinjal showed positive response to AM fungal inoculation. The per cent AM fungal root colonization was maximum (48.6%) in Ankur variety. While, Jyothi and Manjirigutta showed 40.15 and 40.0% respectively. Plants inoculated with G. fasciculatum resulted in significant increase in plant height, shoot and root fresh and dry weights over nonmycorrhizal control plants. The cultivar Manjirigutta showed greater response to G. fasciculatum by recording maximum shoot fresh (63.7gm/plant) and dry weights (5.43gm/plant) followed by Jyothi and Ankur (61.83 and 56.30 gm/plant respectively) and (7.33, 7.03gm/plant respectively). Similar trend was observed with regard to root fresh and dry weight (8.88 and 1.87gm/plant) followed by Jyothi and Ankur (8.83, 0.75 and 8.38, 0.88gm/plant respectively). The analysis of variance for biomass and dry matter production in three selected cultivars showed statistically significant differences between groups, and between time intervals. Shoots and roots of AM inoculated plants recorded significantly (p < 0.000) higher N, P, K levels than control plants indicating that these three elements were efficiently transported in mycorrhizal inoculated plants. Phosphorus content increased more than two folds in mycorrhizal plants over non-mycorrhizal plants. The results of our experiment therefore proved that Glomus fasciculatum acted as a biofertilizer in three cultivars of brinjal in increasing the shoot and root biomass, dry matter production and nutrient uptake.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ankur had the highest mycorrhizal root colonization at 48.6%.

Material
Ankure0
Interactor
AM fungale0symbiont
Outcome
AM fungal root colonizatione0
Direction
maximume0
Value
48.6%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The per cent AM fungal root colonization was maximum (48.6%) in Ankur variety.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–600 · show in text ↑
e1

“three different cultivars viz., Jyothi, Ankur and Manjirigutta of brinjal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 106–179 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Jyothi had 40.15% mycorrhizal root colonization.

Material
Jyothie0
Interactor
AM fungale1symbiont
Outcome
AM fungal root colonizatione1
Value
40.15e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Jyothi and Manjirigutta showed 40.15 and 40.0% respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–668 · show in text ↑
e1

“The per cent AM fungal root colonization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–562 · show in text ↑
e2

“three different cultivars viz., Jyothi, Ankur and Manjirigutta of brinjal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 106–179 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manjirigutta had 40.0% mycorrhizal root colonization.

Material
Manjiriguttae0
Interactor
AM fungale1symbiont
Outcome
AM fungal root colonizatione1
Value
40.0%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Jyothi and Manjirigutta showed 40.15 and 40.0% respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–668 · show in text ↑
e1

“The per cent AM fungal root colonization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–562 · show in text ↑
e2

“three different cultivars viz., Jyothi, Ankur and Manjirigutta of brinjal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 106–179 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation significantly increased plant height versus nonmycorrhizal controls.

Treatment
inoculated with G. fasciculatume0
Interactor
G. fasciculatumRhizophagus fasciculatuse0symbiont
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
nonmycorrhizal control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants inoculated with G. fasciculatum resulted in significant increase in plant height, shoot and root fresh and dry weights over nonmycorrhizal control plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–830 · show in text ↑
e1

“three different cultivars viz., Jyothi, Ankur and Manjirigutta of brinjal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 106–179 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation significantly increased shoot and root fresh and dry weights versus controls.

Treatment
inoculated with G. fasciculatume0
Interactor
G. fasciculatumRhizophagus fasciculatuse0symbiont
Outcome
shoot and root fresh and dry weightse0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
nonmycorrhizal control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants inoculated with G. fasciculatum resulted in significant increase in plant height, shoot and root fresh and dry weights over nonmycorrhizal control plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–830 · show in text ↑
e1

“three different cultivars viz., Jyothi, Ankur and Manjirigutta of brinjal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 106–179 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manjirigutta shoot fresh weight reached 63.7gm/plant under fungal inoculation.

Material
Manjiriguttae0
Interactor
G. fasciculatumRhizophagus fasciculatuse0symbiont
Outcome
shoot freshe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
63.7gm/plante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cultivar Manjirigutta showed greater response to G. fasciculatum by recording maximum shoot fresh (63.7gm/plant) and dry weights (5.43gm/plant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–978 · show in text ↑
e1

“three different cultivars viz., Jyothi, Ankur and Manjirigutta of brinjal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 106–179 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manjirigutta shoot dry weight was 5.43gm/plant under fungal inoculation.

Material
Manjiriguttae0
Interactor
G. fasciculatumRhizophagus fasciculatuse0symbiont
Outcome
dry weightse0
Direction
maximume0
Value
5.43gm/plante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cultivar Manjirigutta showed greater response to G. fasciculatum by recording maximum shoot fresh (63.7gm/plant) and dry weights (5.43gm/plant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–978 · show in text ↑
e1

“three different cultivars viz., Jyothi, Ankur and Manjirigutta of brinjal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 106–179 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Jyothi shoot fresh weight was 61.83 gm/plant.

Material
Jyothie0
Outcome
shoot freshe2
Value
61.83e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“followed by Jyothi and Ankur (61.83 and 56.30 gm/plant respectively) and (7.33, 7.03gm/plant respectively).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1086 · show in text ↑
e1

“three different cultivars viz., Jyothi, Ankur and Manjirigutta of brinjal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 106–179 · show in text ↑
e2

“recording maximum shoot fresh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–932 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ankur shoot fresh weight was 56.30 gm/plant.

Material
Ankure0
Outcome
shoot freshe2
Value
56.30 gm/plante0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“followed by Jyothi and Ankur (61.83 and 56.30 gm/plant respectively) and (7.33, 7.03gm/plant respectively).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1086 · show in text ↑
e1

“three different cultivars viz., Jyothi, Ankur and Manjirigutta of brinjal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 106–179 · show in text ↑
e2

“recording maximum shoot fresh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–932 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot dry weights in Jyothi and Ankur were 7.33 and 7.03gm/plant, respectively.

Material
Jyothi and Ankure0
Outcome
dry weightse2
Value
7.33, 7.03gm/plante0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“followed by Jyothi and Ankur (61.83 and 56.30 gm/plant respectively) and (7.33, 7.03gm/plant respectively).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1086 · show in text ↑
e1

“three different cultivars viz., Jyothi, Ankur and Manjirigutta of brinjal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 106–179 · show in text ↑
e2

“and dry weights (5.43gm/plant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–978 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manjirigutta root fresh weight was 8.88gm/plant.

Material
Manjiriguttae1
Outcome
root freshe0
Value
8.88 and 1.87gm/plante0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root fresh and dry weight (8.88 and 1.87gm/plant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1178 · show in text ↑
e1

“cultivar Manjirigutta”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 835–856 · show in text ↑
e2

“three different cultivars viz., Jyothi, Ankur and Manjirigutta of brinjal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 106–179 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manjirigutta root dry weight was 1.87gm/plant.

Material
Manjiriguttae1
Outcome
root fresh and dry weighte0
Value
1.87gm/plante0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root fresh and dry weight (8.88 and 1.87gm/plant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1178 · show in text ↑
e1

“cultivar Manjirigutta”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 835–856 · show in text ↑
e2

“three different cultivars viz., Jyothi, Ankur and Manjirigutta of brinjal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 106–179 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biomass and dry matter differed significantly among cultivar groups and time intervals.

Material
three selected cultivarse0
Outcome
biomass and dry matter productione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The analysis of variance for biomass and dry matter production in three selected cultivars showed statistically significant differences between groups, and between time intervals.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1258–1437 · show in text ↑
e1

“three different cultivars viz., Jyothi, Ankur and Manjirigutta of brinjal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 106–179 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal plants had significantly higher shoot and root N, P and K levels than controls.

Organ / stage
Shoots and rootse0
Treatment
AM inoculatede0
Outcome
N, P, K levelse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shoots and roots of AM inoculated plants recorded significantly (p < 0.000) higher N, P, K levels than control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1438–1555 · show in text ↑
e1

“three different cultivars viz., Jyothi, Ankur and Manjirigutta of brinjal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 106–179 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal plant phosphorus content increased more than twofold relative to nonmycorrhizal plants.

Treatment
mycorrhizal plantse0
Outcome
Phosphorus contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
more than two foldse0
Comparator
non-mycorrhizal plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phosphorus content increased more than two folds in mycorrhizal plants over non-mycorrhizal plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1656–1755 · show in text ↑
e1

“three different cultivars viz., Jyothi, Ankur and Manjirigutta of brinjal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 106–179 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded that Glomus fasciculatum functioned as a biofertilizer for brinjal growth and nutrient uptake.

Interactor
Glomus fasciculatumRhizophagus fasciculatuse0symbiont
Outcome
biofertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Glomus fasciculatum acted as a biofertilizer in three cultivars of brinjal in increasing the shoot and root biomass, dry matter production and nutrient uptake.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1808–1967 · show in text ↑

Rhizophagus fasciculatus · growth · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

inoculation · growth · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 38 positive, 11 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

mycorrhiza · nutrient: content · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.