Abstract
The selection of AM fungi is required to characterize the native AM fungi population from the soil types. The recent studies have clearly reported that these fungi are host preference in enhancing the growth, yield and nutrient. In the present study six indigenous AM fungi were selected from chillies growing fields of Haveri. These six AM fungi were inoculated to cultivar Sankeshwar of Capsicum annuum L. at green house conditions. Plants harvested at 60 and 90 days after inoculation. The results obtained from the experiments were clearly evidence that the positive influence of Glomus macrocarpum Tulasne amp Tulasne.nbsp on cultivar Sankeshwar of Capsicum annuum L. plants in increasing plant height, root length, fresh weight of shoot and fresh weight of root, % root colonization, spore number and P uptake in shoot and root. Similarly the improvement of number of fruits was higher. The second AM fungus Rhizophagus fasciculatus (Thaxt.) Walker amp Schuumlszligler was influenced in all the different parameters it is followed by Glomus mosseae respectively. And thus an indigenous AM fungi play an important role over the control plants or non inoculated plants. This is mainly due to AM fungal species differ considerably in their efficiency to colonize and influenced plant growth biomass yield and nutrient uptake.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Glomus macrocarpum increased plant height, root length and shoot and root fresh weight of chilli compared with non-inoculated plants
- Taxon
- Capsicum annuum L
Capsicum annuumt0 - Material
- Sankeshware1
- Treatment
- six AM fungi were inoculatede0
- Interactor
- Glomus macrocarpum
Glomus macrocarpume1symbiont - Outcome
- plant height, root length, fresh weight of shoot and fresh weight of roote1
- Direction
- increasinge1
- Comparator
- non inoculated plantse4
- Setting
- green house conditionse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“cultivar Sankeshwar of Capsicum annuum L”
e0“These six AM fungi were inoculated to cultivar Sankeshwar of Capsicum annuum L. at green house conditions”
e1“The results obtained from the experiments were clearly evidence that the positive influence of Glomus macrocarpum Tulasne amp Tulasne.nbsp on cultivar Sankeshwar of Capsicum annuum L. plants in increasing plant height, root length, fresh weight of shoot and fresh weight of root”
e4“over the control plants or non inoculated plants”
Claim · model-written summary
Glomus macrocarpum increased root colonization, spore number and P uptake in chilli
- Taxon
- Capsicum annuum LCapsicum annuumt0
- Material
- Sankeshware1
- Treatment
- six AM fungi were inoculatede0
- Interactor
- Glomus macrocarpumGlomus macrocarpume1symbiont
- Outcome
- % root colonization, spore number and P uptake in shoot and roote2
- Direction
- increasinge1
- Comparator
- non inoculated plantse4
- Setting
- green house conditionse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“cultivar Sankeshwar of Capsicum annuum L”
e0“These six AM fungi were inoculated to cultivar Sankeshwar of Capsicum annuum L. at green house conditions”
e1“The results obtained from the experiments were clearly evidence that the positive influence of Glomus macrocarpum Tulasne amp Tulasne.nbsp on cultivar Sankeshwar of Capsicum annuum L. plants in increasing plant height, root length, fresh weight of shoot and fresh weight of root”
e2“% root colonization, spore number and P uptake in shoot and root”
e4“over the control plants or non inoculated plants”
Claim · model-written summary
Inoculation with AM fungi gave a higher number of fruits in chilli than non-inoculated plants
- Taxon
- Capsicum annuum LCapsicum annuumt0
- Treatment
- six AM fungi were inoculatede0
- Outcome
- number of fruitse3
- Direction
- highere3
- Comparator
- non inoculated plantse4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“cultivar Sankeshwar of Capsicum annuum L”
e0“These six AM fungi were inoculated to cultivar Sankeshwar of Capsicum annuum L. at green house conditions”
e3“Similarly the improvement of number of fruits was higher”
e4“over the control plants or non inoculated plants”
Claim · model-written summary
Rhizophagus fasciculatus influenced all the measured parameters of chilli
- Taxon
- Capsicum annuum LCapsicum annuumt0
- Treatment
- six AM fungi were inoculatede0
- Interactor
- Rhizophagus fasciculatusRhizophagus fasciculatuse5symbiont
- Outcome
- all the different parameterse5
- Direction
- influencede5
- Comparator
- non inoculated plantse4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“cultivar Sankeshwar of Capsicum annuum L”
e0“These six AM fungi were inoculated to cultivar Sankeshwar of Capsicum annuum L. at green house conditions”
e4“over the control plants or non inoculated plants”
e5“The second AM fungus Rhizophagus fasciculatus (Thaxt.) Walker amp Schuumlszligler was influenced in all the different parameters it is followed by Glomus mosseae respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Glomus mosseae ranked after Rhizophagus fasciculatus in its influence on chilli parameters
- Taxon
- Capsicum annuum LCapsicum annuumt0
- Treatment
- six AM fungi were inoculatede0
- Interactor
- Glomus mosseae
Funneliformis mosseaee5symbiont - Outcome
- different parameterse5
- Direction
- followed bye5
- Comparator
- non inoculated plantse4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“cultivar Sankeshwar of Capsicum annuum L”
e0“These six AM fungi were inoculated to cultivar Sankeshwar of Capsicum annuum L. at green house conditions”
e4“over the control plants or non inoculated plants”
e5“The second AM fungus Rhizophagus fasciculatus (Thaxt.) Walker amp Schuumlszligler was influenced in all the different parameters it is followed by Glomus mosseae respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
AM fungal species differ in their efficiency to colonize and influence chilli growth, biomass, yield and nutrient uptake
- Taxon
- Capsicum annuum LCapsicum annuumt0
- Outcome
- efficiency to colonize and influenced plant growth biomass yield and nutrient uptakee6
- Qualifier
- AM fungal species differ considerably in their efficiencye6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“cultivar Sankeshwar of Capsicum annuum L”
e6“AM fungal species differ considerably in their efficiency to colonize and influenced plant growth biomass yield and nutrient uptake”
The same questions in other papers
mycorrhiza · yield · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Results differ
20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
18 papers more in this group
See all 22 papers →inoculation · yield · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Results differ
33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
33 papers more in this group
See all 37 papers →inoculation · Glomus macrocarpum · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
mycorrhiza · Glomus macrocarpum · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
mycorrhiza · Rhizophagus fasciculatus · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
mycorrhiza · Funneliformis mosseae · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
inoculation · Funneliformis mosseae · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.