Paper · 2019 · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science

Leaf area index development of local rice varieties as a response to different irrigation management

R Maftukhah; A S Suli; H N Annisa; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Rice is a semi-aquatic plant and grown under anaerobic condition as long as water is available. Nowadays, water scarcity and climate change issues need to be address with new technology to increase water use efficiency in rice production. In the other hand, rice varieties must be able to adapt climate change in the future, especially drought even during rice growth periods. A shallow water depth irrigation, as a strategy to reduce water use might influence the rice growth development. The aim of this study was to characterize the leaf area index development of three different rice varieties grown in continuous flooding and shallow water depth irrigation. Pot experiments were conducted in Yogyakarta, Indonesia with three different rice varieties, i.e Mutiara, IR 64, and Hitam, and cultivated with two different irrigation system namely shallow water depth (SWD) and continuous flooding (CF). Leaf Area Index (LAI) was measured every 10 days and polynomial equation was used to describe LAI development during plant growth. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed using Ms. Excel to determine significant differences between treatments (p < 0.05). Pearson correlation coefficient (R) was used to evaluate the performance of mathematical model. Leaf Area Index (LAI) under shallow water depth irrigation in different rice varieties were not significantly different compare to continuous flooding irrigation. LAI development in different treatment were described by polynomial equation, with various correlation value, ranged between 0.46 – 0.88. IR64 variety under control irrigation resulted lowest R (0.46), indicated that prediction value from observation data was not strongly correlated. However, other treatments showed strong relationship between prediction and observation data.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shallow water depth irrigation did not significantly change rice leaf area index relative to continuous flooding.

Treatment
shallow water depth irrigatione0
Outcome
Leaf Area Index (LAI)e0
Direction
not significantly differente0
Comparator
continuous flooding irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf Area Index (LAI) under shallow water depth irrigation in different rice varieties were not significantly different compare to continuous flooding irrigation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1265–1427 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rice is a semi-aquatic plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–37 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Polynomial equations described rice LAI development with correlations ranging from 0.46 to 0.88.

Outcome
correlation valuee0
Value
0.46 – 0.88e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“LAI development in different treatment were described by polynomial equation, with various correlation value, ranged between 0.46 – 0.88.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1428–1565 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rice is a semi-aquatic plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–37 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

For IR64 under control irrigation, model correlation was the lowest at 0.46 and prediction was weakly correlated with observation.

Material
IR64e0
Treatment
control irrigatione0
Outcome
Re0
Direction
loweste0
Value
0.46e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“IR64 variety under control irrigation resulted lowest R (0.46), indicated that prediction value from observation data was not strongly correlated.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1566–1712 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rice is a semi-aquatic plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–37 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Other irrigation treatments showed a strong relationship between predicted and observed rice LAI.

Outcome
relationship between prediction and observation datae0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“other treatments showed strong relationship between prediction and observation data.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1722–1806 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rice is a semi-aquatic plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–37 · show in text ↑

irrigation · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

291 papers: 222 positive, 69 negative or no effect

68 papers in the same direction as this paper · 222 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

287 papers more in this group

See all 291 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.