Paper · 2019 · Remote Sensing

Establishment of Plot-Yield Prediction Models in Soybean Breeding Programs Using UAV-Based Hyperspectral Remote Sensing

Xiaoyan Zhang; Jinming Zhao; Guijun Yang; et al.

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
61
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Yield evaluation of breeding lines is the key to successful release of cultivars, which is becoming a serious issue due to soil heterogeneity in enlarged field tests. This study aimed at establishing plot-yield prediction models using unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-based hyperspectral remote sensing for yield-selection in large-scale soybean breeding programs. Three sets of soybean breeding lines (1103 in total) were tested in blocks-in-replication experiments for plot yield and canopy spectral reflectance on 454~950 nm bands at different growth stages using a UAV-based hyperspectral spectrometer (Cubert UHD185 Firefly). The four elements for plot-yield prediction model construction were studied respectively and concluded as: the suitable reflectance-sampling unit-size in a plot was its 20%–80% central part; normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and ration vegetation index (RVI) were the best combination of vegetation indices; the initial seed-filling stage (R5) was the best for a single stage prediction, while another was the best combination for a two growth-stage prediction; and multi-variate linear regression was suitable for plot-yield prediction. In model establishment for each material-set, a random half was used for modelling and another half for verification. Twenty-one two growth-stage two vegetation-index prediction models were established and compared for their modelling coefficient of determination (RM2) and root mean square error of the model (RMSEM), verification RV2 and RMSEV, and their sum RS2 and RMSES. Integrated with the coincidence rate between the model predicted and the practical yield-selection results, the models, MA1-2, MA4-2 and MA6-2, with coincidence rates of 56.8%, 58.5% and 52.4%, respectively, were chosen for yield-prediction in yield-test nurseries. The established model construction elements and methods can be used as local models for pre-harvest yield-selection and post-harvest integrated yield-selection in advanced breeding nurseries as well as yield potential prediction in plant-derived-line nurseries. Furthermore, multiple models can be used jointly for plot-yield prediction in soybean breeding programs.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sampling the central 20%–80% of a plot was suitable for reflectance measurement.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Outcome
suitable reflectance-sampling unit-sizee0
Value
20%–80%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the suitable reflectance-sampling unit-size in a plot was its 20%–80% central part”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–817 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–56 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NDVI and RVI were the best combination of indices for yield prediction.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Outcome
best combination of vegetation indicese0
Comparator
vegetation indicese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and ration vegetation index (RVI) were the best combination of vegetation indices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–946 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–56 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The initial seed-filling stage R5 was best for single-stage prediction.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Organ / stage
initial seed-filling stagee0
Outcome
best for a single stage predictione0
Value
R5e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the initial seed-filling stage (R5) was the best for a single stage prediction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–1026 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–56 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Multivariate linear regression was suitable for plot yield prediction.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Outcome
suitable for plot-yield predictione0
Comparator
multi-variate linear regressione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“multi-variate linear regression was suitable for plot-yield prediction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1176 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–56 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Model MA1-2 had 56.8% coincidence with practical yield selection.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Material
MA1-2e0
Outcome
coincidence ratese0
Value
56.8%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“models, MA1-2, MA4-2 and MA6-2, with coincidence rates of 56.8%, 58.5% and 52.4%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1666–1760 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–56 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Model MA4-2 had 58.5% coincidence with practical yield selection.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Material
MA4-2e0
Outcome
coincidence ratese0
Value
58.5%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“models, MA1-2, MA4-2 and MA6-2, with coincidence rates of 56.8%, 58.5% and 52.4%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1666–1760 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–56 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Model MA6-2 had 52.4% coincidence with practical yield selection.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Material
MA6-2e0
Outcome
coincidence ratese0
Value
52.4%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“models, MA1-2, MA4-2 and MA6-2, with coincidence rates of 56.8%, 58.5% and 52.4%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1666–1760 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–56 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose the model methods for yield selection in breeding nurseries.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Outcome
can be used as local models for pre-harvest yield-selection and post-harvest integrated yield-selectione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The established model construction elements and methods can be used as local models for pre-harvest yield-selection and post-harvest integrated yield-selection in advanced breeding nurseries as well as yield potential prediction in plant-derived-line nurseries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1820–2080 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–56 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose using multiple models jointly for soybean plot yield prediction.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Outcome
multiple models can be used jointly for plot-yield predictione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“multiple models can be used jointly for plot-yield prediction in soybean breeding programs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2095–2185 · show in text ↑