Paper · 2018 · Mycosphere

Dominant tree species identity effects on soil fungi are context dependent

LL Shi

9
claims
15
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

Fungal Fungi diversity and community composition are mainly depending on soil and vegetation factors. However, the effects of these drivers on different fungal taxonomy and functional guilds remain largely unexplored, especially in subtropical forest ecosystems. The soil was collected from five dominate tree species forests: Castanopsis carlesii, Castanopsis fabri, Cinnamomum chekiangense, Schima superb, and Cunninghamia lanceolata in Wanmulin National Nature Reserve of South-eastern China. Fungal communities in rhizosphere and bulk soil were assessed employing ITS rDNA illumina sequencing. Ascomycota dominated the fungal community and most of them belong to Saprotrophic fungal group. On the genus level, Cladophialophora, Spirosphaera, and Podospora were dominate in soils of Castanopsis carlesii, Castanopsis fabri, and Cinnamomum chekiangense (> 50% of the OTUs), respectively. Analysis of similarity showed that the Ascomycota and Saprotrophic fungi rather than total fungal community were significantly different among the soils with different dominant tree species. Furthermore, Ascomycota community were affected by soil C, C/N, and total K, while Saprotrophic fungi were explained by changes in tree richness, diameter at breast height and soil available P. In conclusion, our analyses revealed that the effects of dominant tree species on soil fungi are largely depend on different taxonomic and functional groups levels.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ascomycota dominated the fungal community, mostly in the saprotrophic group.

Taxon
tree speciest0
Interactor
AscomycotaAscomycotae0other
Outcome
Ascomycota dominated the fungal communitye0

Verbatim

e0

“Ascomycota dominated the fungal community and most of them belong to Saprotrophic fungal group.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–693 · show in text ↑
t0

“tree species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–21 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cladophialophora dominated Castanopsis carlesii soil fungal OTUs.

Taxon
Castanopsis carlesiiCastanopsis carlesiie0
Interactor
CladophialophoraCladophialophorae0other
Outcome
Cladophialophorae0
Value
> 50%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Castanopsis carlesii
Castanopsis carlesii · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cladophialophora
Cladophialophora · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Medmyco · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cladophialophora, Spirosphaera, and Podospora were dominate in soils of Castanopsis carlesii, Castanopsis fabri, and Cinnamomum chekiangense (> 50% of the OTUs), respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–889 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spirosphaera dominated Castanopsis fabri soil fungal OTUs.

Taxon
Castanopsis fabrie0
Interactor
SpirosphaeraSpirosphaerae0other
Outcome
Spirosphaerae0
Value
> 50%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spirosphaera
Spirosphaera · InteractorJerry Cooper · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cladophialophora, Spirosphaera, and Podospora were dominate in soils of Castanopsis carlesii, Castanopsis fabri, and Cinnamomum chekiangense (> 50% of the OTUs), respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–889 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Podospora dominated Cinnamomum chekiangense soil fungal OTUs.

Taxon
Cinnamomum chekiangenseCinnamomum chekiangensee0
Interactor
PodosporaPodosporae0other
Outcome
Podosporae0
Value
> 50%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cinnamomum chekiangense
Cinnamomum chekiangense · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Podospora
Podospora · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Pierre Gr · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cladophialophora, Spirosphaera, and Podospora were dominate in soils of Castanopsis carlesii, Castanopsis fabri, and Cinnamomum chekiangense (> 50% of the OTUs), respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–889 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ascomycota communities differed significantly among soils with different dominant tree species.

Taxon
tree speciest0
Interactor
AscomycotaAscomycotae0other
Outcome
Ascomycotae0
Direction
differente0
Setting
soils with different dominant tree speciese0

Verbatim

e0

“Ascomycota and Saprotrophic fungi rather than total fungal community were significantly different among the soils with different dominant tree species.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–1080 · show in text ↑
t0

“tree species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–21 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Saprotrophic fungal communities differed significantly among soils with different dominant tree species.

Taxon
tree speciest0
Interactor
Saprotrophic fungie0other
Outcome
Saprotrophic fungie0
Direction
differente0
Setting
soils with different dominant tree speciese0

Verbatim

e0

“Ascomycota and Saprotrophic fungi rather than total fungal community were significantly different among the soils with different dominant tree species.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–1080 · show in text ↑
t0

“tree species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–21 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Total fungal community composition did not differ significantly among dominant-tree soils.

Taxon
tree speciest0
Outcome
total fungal communitye0
Direction
no_changeinferrede0
Setting
soils with different dominant tree speciese0

Verbatim

e0

“rather than total fungal community were significantly different among the soils with different dominant tree species.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 963–1080 · show in text ↑
t0

“tree species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–21 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ascomycota communities were associated with soil C, C/N and total K.

Taxon
tree speciest0
Interactor
AscomycotaAscomycotae0other
Outcome
Ascomycota communitye0
Setting
soil C, C/N, and total Ke0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Ascomycota community were affected by soil C, C/N, and total K”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1156 · show in text ↑
t0

“tree species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–21 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Saprotrophic fungi were associated with tree richness, diameter at breast height and soil available P.

Taxon
tree speciest0
Interactor
Saprotrophic fungie0other
Outcome
Saprotrophic fungie0
Setting
tree richness, diameter at breast height and soil available Pe0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Saprotrophic fungi were explained by changes in tree richness, diameter at breast height and soil available P.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1164–1274 · show in text ↑
t0

“tree species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–21 · show in text ↑