Paper · 2015 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

Physiological and molecular characterization of drought responses and screening of drought tolerant rice varieties

Loo Lean Fen; Mohd Razi Ismail; Zulkarami Berahim; et al.

8
claims
11
verbatim quotes
5
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

Drought stress has now become a severe threat to ensure food security in the developing world as well as in Malaysia.To dertermine physiological and molecular determinants of drought stress and screening of drought tolerant rice varieties, an experiment was conducted in a greenhouse at Universiti Putra Malaysia using eleven rice varieties and two irrigation regimes (well irrigated and water stressed).The present study indicated that traditional rice variety Puteh Perak and Siam is superior drought tolerant while IRRI 2011-IRLON Plot no: 064, MR 220 and BRRI Dhan 56 are moderately drought tolerant, and IRRI 2011-IRLON Plot no: 050 and MR 84 are drought sensitive rice variety.Drought tolerance of those varieties were measured based on rate of tiller reduction, leaf rolling score and drought score during water stress condition.Leaf rolling score was positively correlated to drought score, chlorophyll content and proline accumulation.Significant increase in the proline accumulation and antioxidant enzyme activities (peroxidase and catalase) were also observed under drought stress in all the rice varieties except Siam and Puteh Perak.All the rice varieties including drought tolerant and sensitive showed the existence of OsLEA 30 genes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Puteh Perak and Siam were classified as superior drought tolerant.

Material
Puteh Perak and Siame0
Outcome
superior drought tolerante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“traditional rice variety Puteh Perak and Siam is superior drought tolerant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 437–511 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IRRI 064, MR 220 and BRRI Dhan 56 were moderately drought tolerant.

Material
IRRI 2011-IRLON Plot no: 064, MR 220 and BRRI Dhan 56e0
Outcome
moderately drought tolerante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“IRRI 2011-IRLON Plot no: 064, MR 220 and BRRI Dhan 56 are moderately drought tolerant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 518–603 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–104 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IRRI 050 and MR 84 were drought sensitive.

Material
IRRI 2011-IRLON Plot no: 050 and MR 84e0
Outcome
drought sensitivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“IRRI 2011-IRLON Plot no: 050 and MR 84 are drought sensitive rice variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–682 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf rolling score correlated positively with drought score and chlorophyll content.

Outcome
Leaf rolling scoree0
Direction
positively correlatede0
Comparator
drought score, chlorophyll contente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf rolling score was positively correlated to drought score, chlorophyll content and proline accumulation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–944 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–104 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf rolling score correlated positively with proline accumulation.

Outcome
Leaf rolling scoree0
Direction
positively correlatede0
Comparator
proline accumulatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf rolling score was positively correlated to drought score, chlorophyll content and proline accumulation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–944 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought increased proline accumulation in varieties other than Siam and Puteh Perak.

Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
proline accumulatione0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
except Siam and Puteh Perake0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant increase in the proline accumulation and antioxidant enzyme activities (peroxidase and catalase) were also observed under drought stress in all the rice varieties except Siam and Puteh Perak.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 944–1147 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought increased peroxidase and catalase activity in varieties other than Siam and Puteh Perak.

Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
antioxidant enzyme activities (peroxidase and catalase)e0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
except Siam and Puteh Perake0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant increase in the proline accumulation and antioxidant enzyme activities (peroxidase and catalase) were also observed under drought stress in all the rice varieties except Siam and Puteh Perak.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 944–1147 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All tested rice varieties contained OsLEA 30 genes.

Gene
OsLEA 30e0
Outcome
existence of OsLEA 30 genese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All the rice varieties including drought tolerant and sensitive showed the existence of OsLEA 30 genes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1250 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: osmolytes · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

45 papers: 34 positive, 11 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

drought · soil: biology · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.