Abstract
The main objective of this study was to analyse the shade effect on development, productivity and excellence of grape fruits (Kishmishi seedless). To attain this, three sun (AM sun, PM sun, Full sun) treatments was linked with those plants growing in three shade treatments (50% shade, 80% shade and 100% shade). Different physical, chemical, ecological and quality factors were evaluated under six diverse treatments. Results showed that 50% shade plant stimulated differences in physiological attributes such as enhanced photosynthesis and augmented leaf area index (LAI), resultant in improved performance than conceivable in direct sun light. Accordingly, grape plants grown under 50% shade produced greater quantity (number) of fruits for example 10,350 individual fruits/plant and greater fruit weights (49 and 12 g fresh and dry weight/fruit respectively) with better fruits quality, than those grown in direct sun light or in 80% and 100% shade. Moreover, 50% shade plants had greater biochemical (nutritional, minerals and vitamin contents) and physiological attribute improvement i.e. greater fruit weight and fruit length which would benefit grower to uphold great grapes yields in long term. Fruit quality assessment (FQA) was calculated and evaluation classes indicated that the 50% shade plant score highest grade point (5) and stood in very good class, followed by AM and PM sun with grade point 3.0 and categorized in moderate class. Other three treated plants (Full sun, 80 and 100% shade) score 2.0 and 1.0 grade points and classified into poor and very poor classes, respectively.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
At 50% shade, photosynthesis increased relative to direct sunlight.
Verbatim
e0“50% shade plant stimulated differences in physiological attributes such as enhanced photosynthesis and augmented leaf area index (LAI), resultant in improved performance than conceivable in direct sun light”
t0“VITIS VINIFERA L. (GRAPES)”
Claim · model-written summary
At 50% shade, leaf area index increased relative to direct sunlight.
Verbatim
e0“50% shade plant stimulated differences in physiological attributes such as enhanced photosynthesis and augmented leaf area index (LAI), resultant in improved performance than conceivable in direct sun light”
t0“VITIS VINIFERA L. (GRAPES)”
Claim · model-written summary
Grape plants at 50% shade produced a greater fruit number of 10,350 per plant.
Verbatim
e0“grape plants grown under 50% shade produced greater quantity (number) of fruits for example 10,350 individual fruits/plant and greater fruit weights (49 and 12 g fresh and dry weight/fruit respectively) with better fruits quality, than those grown in direct sun light or in 80% and 100% shade”
Claim · model-written summary
Fruit fresh weight under 50% shade was greater, at 49 g per fruit.
Verbatim
e0“greater fruit weights (49 and 12 g fresh and dry weight/fruit respectively) with better fruits quality, than those grown in direct sun light or in 80% and 100% shade”
e1“grape plants grown under 50% shade”
Claim · model-written summary
Fruit dry weight under 50% shade was greater, at 12 g per fruit.
Verbatim
e0“greater fruit weights (49 and 12 g fresh and dry weight/fruit respectively) with better fruits quality, than those grown in direct sun light or in 80% and 100% shade”
e1“grape plants grown under 50% shade”
Claim · model-written summary
Fruit quality was better at 50% shade than in direct sun or deeper shade.
Verbatim
e0“with better fruits quality, than those grown in direct sun light or in 80% and 100% shade”
e1“grape plants grown under 50% shade”
Claim · model-written summary
At 50% shade, nutritional, mineral, and vitamin contents were greater.
- Taxon
- plantsViridiplantaee0
- Treatment
- 50% shadee0
- Outcome
- nutritional, minerals and vitamin contentse0
- Direction
- greatere0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“50% shade plants had greater biochemical (nutritional, minerals and vitamin contents)”
Claim · model-written summary
At 50% shade, fruit length was greater.
- Taxon
- plantsViridiplantaee0
- Treatment
- 50% shadee0
- Outcome
- fruit lengthe0
- Direction
- greatere0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“50% shade plants had greater biochemical (nutritional, minerals and vitamin contents) and physiological attribute improvement i.e. greater fruit weight and fruit length”
Claim · model-written summary
At 50% shade, fruit quality assessment scored 5 and was very good.
Verbatim
e0“50% shade plant score highest grade point (5) and stood in very good class”
t0“VITIS VINIFERA L. (GRAPES)”
Claim · model-written summary
AM and PM sun received grade point 3.0 and moderate classification.
Verbatim
e0“AM and PM sun with grade point 3.0 and categorized in moderate class”
t0“VITIS VINIFERA L. (GRAPES)”
Claim · model-written summary
Full sun and 80% and 100% shade scored 2.0 and 1.0 grade points and were classified poor or very poor.
Verbatim
e0“Full sun, 80 and 100% shade) score 2.0 and 1.0 grade points and classified into poor and very poor classes”
t0“VITIS VINIFERA L. (GRAPES)”
The same questions in other papers
shade · quality: general · VitisPositive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
shade · physiology: photosynthesis · VitisPositive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →shade · growth · VitisPositive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- no effect
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →shade · quality: phytochemicals · Viridiplantae (plants)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.