Paper · 2019 · Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa

Insect diversity and population dynamics of natural enemies under sorghum–legume intercrops

Oreeditse Karabo; Motshwari Obopile; Bamphitlhi Tiroesele

13
claims
20
verbatim quotes
12
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effect of intercropping sorghum with legumes on insect diversity and population dynamics of natural enemies was evaluated in the 2015/2016 cropping season at Botswana University of Agriculture and Natural Resources in Sebele, Gaborone. Sorghum monocrop, Sorghum bicolar (L) Moench, was intercropped with four commonly grown legumes, namely cowpea, Vigna unguiculata (L) Walp.; groundnut, Arachis hypogea L.; Bambara groundnut, Vigna subterranean (L.) Verdc; and chickpea, Cicer arietinum L. The study showed that intercropping significantly increased insect abundance, from 176.50 individuals on the monocrop to 438 individuals when sorghum was intercropped with cowpea being the highest among the intercrops. Similarly, species diversity significantly increased from 0.24 on monocrop to 0.54 when sorghum was intercropped with cowpea. There were more herbivores than predators, and the predominant insect herbivore found infesting sorghum was Melanaphis sacchari (Zehntner) (n = 2495), followed by Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) (n = 650). There was a significant difference in the level of parasitism between monocrop and intercrop systems. There were significantly more stemborer parasitoids found in the intercrops, ranging from 1 to 5%, compared to sorghum monocrop where no parasitism was observed. Predatory coccinellid density was not significantly influenced by intercropping but was by time of sampling. The results add to the body of knowledge indicating that intercropping significantly increases insect diversity and reduces the pressure of herbivores on crops in agroecosystems. Intercropping sorghum with legumes increased the number of biological control agents and reduced herbivore populations, and therefore can be recommended as a component of integrated pest management.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea intercropping increased insect abundance from 176.50 to 438 individuals relative to sorghum monocrop.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
intercropped with cowpeae0
Outcome
insect abundancee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
438 individualse0
Qualifier
176.50 individualse0
Comparator
monocrope0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping significantly increased insect abundance, from 176.50 individuals on the monocrop to 438 individuals when sorghum was intercropped with cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–673 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea intercropping increased insect species diversity from 0.24 to 0.54.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
intercropped with cowpeae0
Outcome
species diversitye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.54e0
Qualifier
0.24e0
Comparator
monocrope0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“species diversity significantly increased from 0.24 on monocrop to 0.54 when sorghum was intercropped with cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–838 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbivores were more numerous than predators.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Outcome
herbivorese0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
predatorse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were more herbivores than predators”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–881 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–73 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Melanaphis sacchari was the predominant sorghum herbivore, with 2495 counted.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Interactor
Melanaphis sacchariMelanaphis saccharie0herbivore
Outcome
predominant insect herbivoree0
Value
n = 2495e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“predominant insect herbivore found infesting sorghum was Melanaphis sacchari (Zehntner) (n = 2495)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–989 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chilo partellus was next most prevalent, with 650 counted.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Interactor
Chilo partellusChilo partelluse0herbivore
Outcome
Chilo partelluse0
Value
n = 650e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chilo partellus
Chilo partellus · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“followed by Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) (n = 650)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1038 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–73 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Parasitism differed significantly between monocrop and intercrop systems.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Outcome
level of parasitisme0
Comparator
monocrop and intercrop systemse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was a significant difference in the level of parasitism between monocrop and intercrop systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1140 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Stemborer parasitoids were significantly more abundant in intercrops, with 1 to 5% parasitism versus none in monocrop.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
intercropse0
Outcome
stemborer parasitoidse0
Direction
moree0
Value
1 to 5%e0
Qualifier
no parasitisme0
Comparator
sorghum monocrope0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly more stemborer parasitoids found in the intercrops, ranging from 1 to 5%, compared to sorghum monocrop where no parasitism was observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1302 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping did not significantly affect predatory coccinellid density.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
intercroppinge0
Outcome
Predatory coccinellid densitye0
Direction
not significantly influencede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Predatory coccinellid density was not significantly influenced by intercropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1304–1383 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–73 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sampling time significantly affected predatory coccinellid density.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
intercroppinge0
Outcome
Predatory coccinellid densitye0
Qualifier
time of samplinge0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Predatory coccinellid density was not significantly influenced by intercropping but was by time of sampling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1304–1411 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–73 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude intercropping increases insect diversity and reduces herbivore pressure.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
intercroppinge0
Outcome
insect diversitye0
Direction
increasese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping significantly increases insect diversity and reduces the pressure of herbivores on crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1470–1572 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping increased biological control agent numbers.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
Intercropping sorghum with legumese0
Outcome
number of biological control agentse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intercropping sorghum with legumes increased the number of biological control agents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1592–1676 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping reduced herbivore populations.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
Intercropping sorghum with legumese0
Outcome
herbivore populationse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intercropping sorghum with legumes increased the number of biological control agents and reduced herbivore populations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1592–1710 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend sorghum-legume intercropping as part of integrated pest management.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Outcome
component of integrated pest managemente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“can be recommended as a component of integrated pest management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1726–1789 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–73 · show in text ↑

Vigna unguiculata · pest · SorghumPositive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

intercropping · pest · SorghumPositive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
    Infestation did not differ between sorghum monoculture and intercropping with pigeon pea.

    Helicoverpa on sorghum · 1989 · compared with sorghum as a monoculture

    No difference from an alternative

See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.