Paper · 2019 · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Effects of the integration of mixed‐cropping and rice–duck co‐culture on rice yield and soil nutrients in southern China

Meijuan Li; Ronghua Li; Jiaen Zhang; et al.

5
claims
11
verbatim quotes
26
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Biodiversity-based agricultural systems can improve production efficiency and sustainability, with fewer negative environmental impacts and lower use of external inputs. Mixed-cropping and rice-duck co-culture have been shown to produce ecological benefits and to have positive effects on paddy soil. However, the effects of a combination of mixed cropping with different rice cultivars and duck co-culture on soil nutrients availability and grain yields have not been evaluated. A paddy field experiment was carried out over two rice growing seasons to test these effects. RESULTS: Several combinations of rice cultivars, when integrated with duck co-culture, significantly increased the soil organic matter and total nitrogen contents during the rice growing seasons, as compared to mono-cropping systems. In mixed-cropping combined with duck co-culture (MCDC) systems, the soil alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen content ranged from 4.33% to 17.86% higher than that in mono-cropping systems. Similar increases were found for soil available phosphorus (8.71-15.91%) and soil available potassium (8.65-39.43%) contents. Furthermore, MCDC produced higher grain yields and harvest indexes for both study seasons. CONCLUSION: The integration of MCDC systems had positive effects on soil nutrient contents of paddy fields, which could, in turn, lead to yield enhancements, as well as additional income for farmers in the form of organic duck meat. © 2019 Society of Chemical Industry.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice cultivars integrated with duck co-culture significantly increased soil organic matter and total nitrogen contents compared with mono-cropping systems.

Taxon
rice cultivarsOryza sativae0
Treatment
duck co-culturee0
Outcome
soil organic matter and total nitrogen contentse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
mono-cropping systemse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Several combinations of rice cultivars, when integrated with duck co-culture, significantly increased the soil organic matter and total nitrogen contents during the rice growing seasons, as compared to mono-cropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 595–818 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixed-cropping combined with duck co-culture raised soil alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen content by 4.33% to 17.86% relative to mono-cropping systems.

Treatment
mixed-cropping combined with duck co-culture (MCDC) systemse1
Outcome
soil alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen contente1
Direction
highere1
Value
4.33% to 17.86%e1
Comparator
mono-cropping systemse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice yield and soil nutrients”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–102 · show in text ↑
e1

“In mixed-cropping combined with duck co-culture (MCDC) systems, the soil alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen content ranged from 4.33% to 17.86% higher than that in mono-cropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–999 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MCDC raised soil available phosphorus by 8.71-15.91% relative to mono-cropping systems.

Treatment
MCDCe1
Outcome
soil available phosphoruse2
Direction
increasese2
Value
8.71-15.91%e2
Comparator
mono-cropping systemse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice yield and soil nutrients”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–102 · show in text ↑
e1

“In mixed-cropping combined with duck co-culture (MCDC) systems, the soil alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen content ranged from 4.33% to 17.86% higher than that in mono-cropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–999 · show in text ↑
e2

“Similar increases were found for soil available phosphorus (8.71-15.91%) and soil available potassium (8.65-39.43%) contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MCDC raised soil available potassium by 8.65-39.43% relative to mono-cropping systems.

Treatment
MCDCe1
Outcome
soil available potassiume2
Direction
increasese2
Value
8.65-39.43%e2
Comparator
mono-cropping systemse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice yield and soil nutrients”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–102 · show in text ↑
e1

“In mixed-cropping combined with duck co-culture (MCDC) systems, the soil alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen content ranged from 4.33% to 17.86% higher than that in mono-cropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–999 · show in text ↑
e2

“Similar increases were found for soil available phosphorus (8.71-15.91%) and soil available potassium (8.65-39.43%) contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MCDC produced higher grain yields and harvest indexes of rice in both study seasons.

Treatment
MCDCe3
Outcome
grain yields and harvest indexese3
Direction
highere3
Qualifier
for both study seasonse3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice yield and soil nutrients”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–102 · show in text ↑
e3

“MCDC produced higher grain yields and harvest indexes for both study seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1140–1216 · show in text ↑

Anas platyrhynchos · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

Anas platyrhynchos · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

intercropping · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

95 papers: 77 positive, 18 negative or no effect

76 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

91 papers more in this group

See all 95 papers →

intercropping · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

intercropping · soil: chemistry · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.