Paper · 2016 · Journal of Plant Production

Response of Cotton Plant to Spraying Some Natural Materials Under Water Stress Conditions

A. El-Gabiery

20
claims
40
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Two field experiments were carried out at El-Gemmeiza Agricultural Research Station, El-Gharbia Governorate during the two successive seasons of 2015 and 2016. These experiments were conducted to find out the proper irrigation interval and the effect of natural material which reduce the negative effect of water stress as well as their interaction on leaf chemical composition, growth, flowering habit, earliness parameters, seed cotton yield and its components and fiber quality of the Egyptian cotton cultivar Giza 86. A split plot design with three replicates was used in both seasons, where the main plots were assigned to three irrigation intervals (15, 30 and 45 days) and the sub-plots contained natural materials (without, glycine betaine (600 ppm), potassium citrate (3g/l) and salsalic acid (200 ppm) The important results could be summarized as follows: Irrigating intervals gave significant effect on leaf total chlorophyll, carotenoids, phenols and proline content at 114 days, when irrigated every 45 days followed by irrigated every 30 and 15 day in a descending order. Irrigation every 15 days significantly increased plant height at harvest, number of fruiting branches/plant, number of flowers/plant, boll weight and decreased setting and earliness percentages in both seasons as compared with the other two irrigation intervals (every 30 and 45 days). However, the higher number of open bolls/plant and seed cotton yield / fed were obtained from plants which irrigated every 30 days. Irrigation intervals had insignificant effect on seed index and significant effect on lint % in both seasons. The highest value of lint % was resulted from irrigated plants every 45 days. Spraying with natural materials significantly affected leaf total chlorophyll, phenols and proline content, in favor of spraying potassium citrate and significantly affected leaf carotenoids content at, in favor of spraying salsalic acidSpraying with natural materials significantly affected boll weight and number of open bolls/plant in both seasons in favor of spraying glycine betaine and potassium citrate. Application of salsalic acid or glycine betaine gave significant increase in lint % and insignificant effect on seed index in both seasons. Spraying cotton plants with glycine betaine lead to a significant increase in seed cotton yield per fed.Untreated Plants caused a significant increase in plant height at harvest and number of fruiting branches/plant in both seasons as compared with the plants which received glycine betaine, potassium citrate and salsalic acid. Concerning the interaction between irrigation intervals and natural materials, there is a significant interaction effect with regard to leaf total chlorophyll, carotenoids, phenols and proline contents, in favor of irrigated cotton plants every 45 days and spraying with potassium citrate for leaf total chlorophyll, phenols and proline contents and in favor of irrigated cotton plants every 45 days and spraying with salsalic acid for leaf carotenoids content. Irrigation every 30 days and spraying with potassium citrate produced the highest values of lint % in both seasons. The interaction gave insignificant effect on seed index, Presley index and micronaire reading in both seasons. The combined treatment of irrigation interval every 30 days when combined with glycine betaine at the concentration (600 ppm) gave significant increase in seed cotton yield / fed (kentar) in both seasons. The flowering curve in irrigation every 30 and 45 days was higher, start earlier and ending earlier as compared to the flowering curves in the irrigation every 15 days. It could be concluding that irrigation cotton plants every 30 days in combination with spraying with glycine betaine (600 ppm) or potassium citrate (3g/l) three times (at the squaring stage, flowering stage and at the top of flowering) under El-Gemmeiza condition). Also, it could be concluding that irrigation every 45 days in combination with glycine betaine (600 ppm) at the end of water sources and water shortage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation every 45 days gave the highest leaf chlorophyll, carotenoids, phenols and proline content.

Taxon
Cotton PlantGossypium hirsutumt0
Organ / stage
leafe0
Treatment
irrigated every 45 dayse0
Outcome
leaf total chlorophyll, carotenoids, phenols and proline contente0
Direction
descending ordere0
Comparator
irrigated every 30 and 15 daye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigating intervals gave significant effect on leaf total chlorophyll, carotenoids, phenols and proline content at 114 days, when irrigated every 45 days followed by irrigated every 30 and 15 day in a descending order”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–1084 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–24 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation every 15 days increased plant height, fruiting branches and flower number.

Taxon
Cotton PlantGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
Irrigation every 15 dayse0
Outcome
plant height at harvest, number of fruiting branches/plant, number of flowers/plante0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
every 30 and 45 dayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation every 15 days significantly increased plant height at harvest, number of fruiting branches/plant, number of flowers/plant, boll weight and decreased setting and earliness percentages in both seasons as compared with the other two irrigation intervals (every 30 and 45 days)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1086–1370 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–24 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation every 15 days increased boll weight.

Taxon
Cotton PlantGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
Irrigation every 15 dayse0
Outcome
boll weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
every 30 and 45 dayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation every 15 days significantly increased plant height at harvest, number of fruiting branches/plant, number of flowers/plant, boll weight and decreased setting and earliness percentages in both seasons as compared with the other two irrigation intervals (every 30 and 45 days)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1086–1370 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–24 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation every 15 days decreased setting and earliness percentages.

Taxon
Cotton PlantGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
Irrigation every 15 dayse0
Outcome
setting and earliness percentagese0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
every 30 and 45 dayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation every 15 days significantly increased plant height at harvest, number of fruiting branches/plant, number of flowers/plant, boll weight and decreased setting and earliness percentages in both seasons as compared with the other two irrigation intervals (every 30 and 45 days)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1086–1370 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–24 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation every 30 days gave more open bolls and seed cotton yield.

Taxon
Cotton PlantGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
irrigated every 30 dayse0
Outcome
number of open bolls/plant and seed cotton yield / fede0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the higher number of open bolls/plant and seed cotton yield / fed were obtained from plants which irrigated every 30 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1381–1502 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–24 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation interval had no significant effect on seed index.

Taxon
Cotton PlantGossypium hirsutumt0
Outcome
seed indexe0
Direction
insignificant effecte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation intervals had insignificant effect on seed index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1504–1563 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–24 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest lint percentage followed irrigation every 45 days.

Taxon
Cotton PlantGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
irrigated plants every 45 dayse0
Outcome
lint %e0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest value of lint % was resulted from irrigated plants every 45 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1614–1690 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–24 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium citrate spraying favored leaf chlorophyll, phenols and proline content.

Taxon
Cotton PlantGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
spraying potassium citratee0
Outcome
leaf total chlorophyll, phenols and proline contente0
Direction
in favor ofe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spraying with natural materials significantly affected leaf total chlorophyll, phenols and proline content, in favor of spraying potassium citrate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1692–1838 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–24 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salicylic acid spraying favored leaf carotenoid content.

Taxon
Cotton PlantGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
spraying salsalic acide0
Outcome
leaf carotenoids contente0
Direction
in favor ofe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly affected leaf carotenoids content at, in favor of spraying salsalic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1843–1929 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–24 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Glycine betaine and potassium citrate spraying favored boll weight and open boll number.

Taxon
Cotton PlantGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
spraying glycine betaine and potassium citratee0
Outcome
boll weight and number of open bolls/plante0
Direction
in favor ofe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spraying with natural materials significantly affected boll weight and number of open bolls/plant in both seasons in favor of spraying glycine betaine and potassium citrate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1929–2101 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–24 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salicylic acid or glycine betaine increased lint percentage.

Taxon
Cotton PlantGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
salsalic acid or glycine betainee0
Outcome
lint %e0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of salsalic acid or glycine betaine gave significant increase in lint %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2103–2186 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–24 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salicylic acid or glycine betaine had no significant effect on seed index.

Taxon
Cotton PlantGossypium hirsutumt0
Outcome
seed indexe0
Direction
insignificant effecte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“insignificant effect on seed index in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2191–2241 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–24 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Glycine betaine spraying increased seed cotton yield.

Taxon
Cotton PlantGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
glycine betainee0
Outcome
seed cotton yield per fede0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spraying cotton plants with glycine betaine lead to a significant increase in seed cotton yield per fed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2243–2346 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–24 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Untreated plants had greater height and fruiting branch number than sprayed plants.

Taxon
Cotton PlantGossypium hirsutumt0
Outcome
plant height at harvest and number of fruiting branches/plante0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
plants which received glycine betaine, potassium citrate and salsalic acide0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Untreated Plants caused a significant increase in plant height at harvest and number of fruiting branches/plant in both seasons as compared with the plants which received glycine betaine, potassium citrate and salsalic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2347–2570 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–24 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation every 45 days with potassium citrate favored leaf chlorophyll, phenols and proline.

Taxon
Cotton PlantGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
spraying with potassium citratee0
Outcome
leaf total chlorophyll, phenols and proline contentse0
Direction
in favor ofe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in favor of irrigated cotton plants every 45 days and spraying with potassium citrate for leaf total chlorophyll, phenols and proline contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2775–2917 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–24 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation every 45 days with salicylic acid favored leaf carotenoids.

Taxon
Cotton PlantGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
spraying with salsalic acide0
Outcome
leaf carotenoids contente0
Direction
in favor ofe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in favor of irrigated cotton plants every 45 days and spraying with salsalic acid for leaf carotenoids content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2922–3032 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–24 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation every 30 days with potassium citrate produced the highest lint percentage.

Taxon
Cotton PlantGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
spraying with potassium citratee0
Outcome
lint %e0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation every 30 days and spraying with potassium citrate produced the highest values of lint % in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3034–3148 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–24 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation and spray interaction had no significant effect on seed index, Presley index or micronaire reading.

Taxon
Cotton PlantGossypium hirsutumt0
Outcome
seed index, Presley index and micronaire readinge0
Direction
insignificant effecte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The interaction gave insignificant effect on seed index, Presley index and micronaire reading in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3150–3259 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–24 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation every 30 days with glycine betaine increased seed cotton yield.

Taxon
Cotton PlantGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
glycine betaine at the concentration (600 ppm)e0
Outcome
seed cotton yield / fed (kentar)e0
Direction
increasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irrigation interval every 30 days when combined with glycine betaine at the concentration (600 ppm) gave significant increase in seed cotton yield / fed (kentar)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3287–3448 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–24 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flowering curves under 30- and 45-day irrigation were higher and earlier than under 15-day irrigation.

Taxon
Cotton PlantGossypium hirsutumt0
Outcome
flowering curvee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
irrigation every 15 dayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The flowering curve in irrigation every 30 and 45 days was higher, start earlier and ending earlier as compared to the flowering curves in the irrigation every 15 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3466–3633 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–24 · show in text ↑

glycine betaine · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

irrigation · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

399 papers: 304 positive, 95 negative or no effect

303 papers in the same direction as this paper · 86 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

395 papers more in this group

See all 399 papers →

application · physiology: pigments · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

33 papers: 33 positive, 0 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.