Paper · 2019 · FEMS Microbiology Ecology

Comparison of the plant growth-promotion performance of a consortium of Bacilli inoculated as endospores or as vegetative cells

Isha Hashmi; Christophe Paul; Andrej Al-Dourobi; et al.

6
claims
15
verbatim quotes
28
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The effect of three plant growth-promoting Bacillus strains inoculated either alone or as a consortium was tested on oat (Avena sativa) growth. The bioinoculants were applied as vegetative cells or endospores at low cell densities on the seeds and their effect was tested in sterile in vitro conditions, pot experiments, and a field trial. The in vitro seed germination assay showed that both individual bacterial inocula and bacterial consortia had positive effects on seed germination. Greenhouse pot experiments with sterile and non-sterile soil showed that consortia increased the total dry biomass of oat plants as compared to single strain inoculation and uninoculated controls. However, the positive impact on plant growth was less prominent when the bioinoculated strains had to compete with native soil microbes. Finally, the field experiment demonstrated that the consortium of vegetative cells was more efficient in promoting oat growth than the endospore consortium and the uninoculated control. Moreover, both consortia successfully colonized the roots and the rhizosphere of oat plants, without modifying the overall structure of the autochthonous soil microbial communities.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Individual Bacillus inocula and consortia had positive effects on oat seed germination in vitro.

Treatment
individual bacterial inocula and bacterial consortiae0
Interactor
Bacillus strainse2symbiont
Outcome
seed germinatione0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Setting
in vitroe3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both individual bacterial inocula and bacterial consortia had positive effects on seed germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 388–486 · show in text ↑
e1

“oat (Avena sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–135 · show in text ↑
e2

“three plant growth-promoting Bacillus strains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 14–59 · show in text ↑
e3

“sterile in vitro conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 275–302 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In greenhouse pot experiments, Bacillus consortia increased total dry biomass of oat plants compared with single-strain inoculation and uninoculated controls.

Treatment
consortiae0
Interactor
Bacillus strainse2symbiont
Outcome
total dry biomasse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
single strain inoculation and uninoculated controlse0
Setting
Greenhouse pot experimentse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“consortia increased the total dry biomass of oat plants as compared to single strain inoculation and uninoculated controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–683 · show in text ↑
e3

“Greenhouse pot experiments with sterile and non-sterile soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–548 · show in text ↑
e2

“three plant growth-promoting Bacillus strains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 14–59 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The positive impact of the inoculants on oat growth was less prominent when the strains had to compete with native soil microbes.

Outcome
positive impact on plant growthe0
Direction
less prominente0
Qualifier
compete with native soil microbese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the positive impact on plant growth was less prominent when the bioinoculated strains had to compete with native soil microbes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–820 · show in text ↑
e1

“oat (Avena sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In a field experiment, the consortium of vegetative cells promoted oat growth more than the endospore consortium and the uninoculated control.

Treatment
consortium of vegetative cellse0
Interactor
Bacillus strainse2symbiont
Outcome
promoting oat growthe0
Direction
more efficiente0
Comparator
endospore consortium and the uninoculated controle0
Setting
field experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the field experiment demonstrated that the consortium of vegetative cells was more efficient in promoting oat growth than the endospore consortium and the uninoculated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–1006 · show in text ↑
e2

“three plant growth-promoting Bacillus strains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 14–59 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both consortia successfully colonized the roots and rhizosphere of oat plants.

Interactor
Bacillus strainse2symbiont
Outcome
colonized the roots and the rhizospheree0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both consortia successfully colonized the roots and the rhizosphere of oat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1099 · show in text ↑
e2

“three plant growth-promoting Bacillus strains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 14–59 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The consortia did not modify the overall structure of the autochthonous soil microbial communities.

Outcome
overall structure of the autochthonous soil microbial communitiese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“without modifying the overall structure of the autochthonous soil microbial communities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1101–1188 · show in text ↑
e1

“oat (Avena sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–135 · show in text ↑

inoculation · growth · Avena sativa (oats)Results differ

33 papers: 30 positive, 3 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.