Paper · 2019 · Weed Technology

Control of thiocarbamate-resistant rigid ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) in wheat in southern Australia

David J. Brunton; Peter Boutsalis; Gurjeet Gill; et al.

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
14
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Two field experiments were conducted during 2018 at Paskeville and Arthurton, South Australia, to identify effective herbicide options for the control of thiocarbamate-resistant rigid ryegrass in wheat. Dose–response experiments confirmed resistance in both field populations (T1 and A18) of rigid ryegrass to triallate, prosulfocarb, trifluralin, and pyroxasulfone. T1 and A18 were 17.9- and 20-fold more resistant to triallate than susceptible SLR4. The level of resistance detected in T1 to prosulfocarb (5.9-fold) and pyroxasulfone (4-fold) was lower compared to A18, which displayed 12.1- and 7.8-fold resistance to both herbicides, respectively. Despite resistance, the mixture of two different preplant-incorporated (PPI) site-of-action herbicides improved rigid ryegrass control and wheat yield compared to a single PPI herbicide only. Prosulfocarb + triallate and prosulfocarb + S -metolachlor + triallate did not reduce rigid ryegrass seed set when compared to prosulfocarb applied alone at the higher rate (2,400 g ai ha –1 ). Pyroxasulfone + triallate PPI followed by glyphosate (1,880 g ai ha -1 ) as a weed seed set control treatment reduced rigid ryegrass seed production by 93% and 95% at both sites, respectively. These herbicides also significantly improved grain yield of wheat at Paskeville (22%) and Arthurton (38%) compared to the untreated.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T1 rigid ryegrass was 17.9-fold more triallate-resistant than SLR4.

Material
T1e0
Interactor
rigid ryegrasst0weed
Outcome
resistant to triallatee0
Direction
more resistante0
Value
17.9-e0
Comparator
susceptible SLR4e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T1 and A18 were 17.9- and 20-fold more resistant to triallate than susceptible SLR4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 376–459 · show in text ↑
t0

“rigid ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–75 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A18 rigid ryegrass was 20-fold more triallate-resistant than SLR4.

Material
A18e0
Interactor
rigid ryegrasst0weed
Outcome
resistant to triallatee0
Direction
more resistante0
Value
20-folde0
Comparator
susceptible SLR4e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T1 and A18 were 17.9- and 20-fold more resistant to triallate than susceptible SLR4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 376–459 · show in text ↑
t0

“rigid ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–75 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T1 had 5.9-fold resistance to prosulfocarb, below A18.

Material
T1e0
Interactor
rigid ryegrasst0weed
Outcome
resistance detected in T1 to prosulfocarbe0
Direction
lowere0
Value
5.9-folde0
Comparator
A18e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“resistance detected in T1 to prosulfocarb (5.9-fold) and pyroxasulfone (4-fold) was lower compared to A18”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 474–579 · show in text ↑
t0

“rigid ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–75 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T1 had 4-fold resistance to pyroxasulfone, below A18.

Material
T1e0
Interactor
rigid ryegrasst0weed
Outcome
pyroxasulfonee0
Direction
lowere0
Value
4-folde0
Comparator
A18e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“resistance detected in T1 to prosulfocarb (5.9-fold) and pyroxasulfone (4-fold) was lower compared to A18”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 474–579 · show in text ↑
t0

“rigid ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–75 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A18 had 12.1-fold prosulfocarb resistance.

Material
A18e0
Interactor
rigid ryegrasst0weed
Outcome
resistance to both herbicidese0
Value
12.1-e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A18, which displayed 12.1- and 7.8-fold resistance to both herbicides, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–659 · show in text ↑
e1

“prosulfocarb (5.9-fold) and pyroxasulfone (4-fold)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–553 · show in text ↑
t0

“rigid ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–75 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A18 had 7.8-fold pyroxasulfone resistance.

Material
A18e0
Interactor
rigid ryegrasst0weed
Outcome
resistance to both herbicidese0
Value
7.8-folde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A18, which displayed 12.1- and 7.8-fold resistance to both herbicides, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–659 · show in text ↑
e1

“prosulfocarb (5.9-fold) and pyroxasulfone (4-fold)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–553 · show in text ↑
t0

“rigid ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two preplant-incorporated herbicides improved rigid ryegrass control over one.

Treatment
mixture of two different preplant-incorporated (PPI) site-of-action herbicidese0
Interactor
rigid ryegrasse0weed
Outcome
rigid ryegrass controle0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
a single PPI herbicide onlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the mixture of two different preplant-incorporated (PPI) site-of-action herbicides improved rigid ryegrass control and wheat yield compared to a single PPI herbicide only”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 681–851 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two preplant-incorporated herbicides improved wheat yield over one.

Treatment
mixture of two different preplant-incorporated (PPI) site-of-action herbicidese0
Outcome
wheat yielde0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
a single PPI herbicide onlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the mixture of two different preplant-incorporated (PPI) site-of-action herbicides improved rigid ryegrass control and wheat yield compared to a single PPI herbicide only”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 681–851 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prosulfocarb plus triallate did not reduce ryegrass seed set versus high-rate prosulfocarb alone.

Treatment
Prosulfocarb + triallatee0
Interactor
rigid ryegrasse0weed
Outcome
rigid ryegrass seed sete0
Direction
did not reducee0
Comparator
prosulfocarb applied alone at the higher rate (2,400 g ai ha –1 )e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Prosulfocarb + triallate and prosulfocarb + S -metolachlor + triallate did not reduce rigid ryegrass seed set when compared to prosulfocarb applied alone at the higher rate (2,400 g ai ha –1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–1045 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prosulfocarb plus S-metolachlor plus triallate did not reduce ryegrass seed set versus high-rate prosulfocarb alone.

Treatment
prosulfocarb + S -metolachlor + triallatee0
Interactor
rigid ryegrasse0weed
Outcome
rigid ryegrass seed sete0
Direction
did not reducee0
Comparator
prosulfocarb applied alone at the higher rate (2,400 g ai ha –1 )e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Prosulfocarb + triallate and prosulfocarb + S -metolachlor + triallate did not reduce rigid ryegrass seed set when compared to prosulfocarb applied alone at the higher rate (2,400 g ai ha –1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–1045 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pyroxasulfone plus triallate followed by glyphosate reduced ryegrass seed production by 93% at Paskeville.

Treatment
Pyroxasulfone + triallate PPI followed by glyphosate (1,880 g ai ha -1 )e0
Interactor
rigid ryegrasse0weed
Outcome
rigid ryegrass seed productione0
Direction
reducede0
Value
93%e0
Setting
Paskevillee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pyroxasulfone + triallate PPI followed by glyphosate (1,880 g ai ha -1 ) as a weed seed set control treatment reduced rigid ryegrass seed production by 93% and 95% at both sites, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1238 · show in text ↑
e1

“at Paskeville and Arthurton, South Australia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 58–102 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same sequence reduced ryegrass seed production by 95% at Arthurton.

Treatment
Pyroxasulfone + triallate PPI followed by glyphosate (1,880 g ai ha -1 )e0
Interactor
rigid ryegrasse0weed
Outcome
rigid ryegrass seed productione0
Direction
reducede0
Value
95%e0
Setting
Arthurtone1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pyroxasulfone + triallate PPI followed by glyphosate (1,880 g ai ha -1 ) as a weed seed set control treatment reduced rigid ryegrass seed production by 93% and 95% at both sites, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1238 · show in text ↑
e1

“at Paskeville and Arthurton, South Australia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 58–102 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The herbicides increased wheat grain yield 22% at Paskeville versus untreated.

Treatment
These herbicidese0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
improvede0
Value
22%e0
Comparator
the untreatede0
Setting
Paskevillee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These herbicides also significantly improved grain yield of wheat at Paskeville (22%) and Arthurton (38%) compared to the untreated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1240–1371 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The herbicides increased wheat grain yield 38% at Arthurton versus untreated.

Treatment
These herbicidese0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
improvede0
Value
38%e0
Comparator
the untreatede0
Setting
Arthurtone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These herbicides also significantly improved grain yield of wheat at Paskeville (22%) and Arthurton (38%) compared to the untreated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1240–1371 · show in text ↑

Tri-allate · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

glyphosate · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

37 papers: 20 positive, 17 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

metolachlor · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

pyroxasulfone · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

18 papers: 18 positive, 0 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

climate site · control · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

herbicide · control · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 34 positive, 5 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

climate site · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

154 papers: 72 positive, 82 negative or no effect

71 papers in the same direction as this paper · 79 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

150 papers more in this group

See all 154 papers →

herbicide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

563 papers: 466 positive, 97 negative or no effect

465 papers in the same direction as this paper · 87 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

559 papers more in this group

See all 563 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.