Paper · 2019 · Agronomy

Long-Term Impact of Potassium Fertilization on Soil and Productivity in Intensive Olive Cultivation

Amnon Haberman; Arnon Dag; Nerya Shtern; et al.

13
claims
25
verbatim quotes
21
citations
5
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The olive growing sector is transitioning from traditional to intensive irrigated cultivation, dictating a need to reconsider orchard management practices including fertilization. Potassium (K) is an essential nutrient, typically found in high concentrations in plants. Orchard K fertilization requirements are commonly derived from the disparity between assumed tree requirements and extractable soil K. The long-term impact of insufficient fertilization on K available in the soil, growth, and yield of irrigated field-grown olive trees was evaluated over six consecutive seasons. Withholding of K fertilization led to lower exchangeable and soluble K concentrations in the soil and significantly impaired yield. The reduction in yield was attributed to reduced flowering and fruit set, resulting in a lower fruit number. Tree vegetative growth and flowering quality traits were not affected. In addition, trees not receiving K appeared to be more susceptible to alternate bearing. Following two seasons of omitting K fertilization, leaf K concentration did not decrease below the conventionally accepted sufficiency threshold for olive (0.8%). In spite of this, the trees produced significantly lower yields. Our results suggest that long-term insufficient K fertilization results in reduced soil available K and consequently impairs tree productivity. The results imply that the sufficiency threshold for K in diagnostic leaves should be reconsidered for intensive orchards. Moreover, the current method for K deficiency detection using leaf K concentration may be inadequate for intensive orchards. Integration of other parameters, such as fruit K content, leaf Na, and changes in soil exchangeable K content or sorption energy, may promote a more reliable analysis of orchard K nutritional status.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Withholding potassium lowered soil exchangeable potassium.

Taxon
OliveOlea europaeat0
Treatment
Withholding of K fertilizatione0
Outcome
K concentrations in the soile0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
exchangeablee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Withholding of K fertilization led to lower exchangeable and soluble K concentrations in the soil and significantly impaired yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 583–714 · show in text ↑
t0

“Olive”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Withholding potassium lowered soil soluble potassium.

Taxon
OliveOlea europaeat0
Treatment
Withholding of K fertilizatione0
Outcome
soluble K concentrations in the soile0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Withholding of K fertilization led to lower exchangeable and soluble K concentrations in the soil and significantly impaired yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 583–714 · show in text ↑
t0

“Olive”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Withholding potassium significantly impaired olive yield.

Taxon
OliveOlea europaeat0
Treatment
Withholding of K fertilizatione0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
impairede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Withholding of K fertilization led to lower exchangeable and soluble K concentrations in the soil and significantly impaired yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 583–714 · show in text ↑
t0

“Olive”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–87 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced flowering was attributed as a cause of lower yield.

Taxon
OliveOlea europaeat0
Outcome
reduction in yielde0
Direction
reductione0
Qualifier
reduced floweringe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The reduction in yield was attributed to reduced flowering and fruit set, resulting in a lower fruit number.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 715–823 · show in text ↑
t0

“Olive”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–87 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced fruit set was attributed as a cause of lower yield.

Taxon
OliveOlea europaeat0
Outcome
reduction in yielde0
Direction
reductione0
Qualifier
fruit sete0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The reduction in yield was attributed to reduced flowering and fruit set, resulting in a lower fruit number.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 715–823 · show in text ↑
t0

“Olive”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit number was lower with reduced flowering and fruit set.

Taxon
OliveOlea europaeat0
Outcome
fruit numbere0
Direction
lowere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The reduction in yield was attributed to reduced flowering and fruit set, resulting in a lower fruit number.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 715–823 · show in text ↑
t0

“Olive”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tree vegetative growth and flowering quality traits were unaffected.

Taxon
OliveOlea europaeat0
Outcome
Tree vegetative growth and flowering quality traitse0
Direction
not affectede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tree vegetative growth and flowering quality traits were not affected.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–894 · show in text ↑
t0

“Olive”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–87 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trees without potassium appeared more susceptible to alternate bearing.

Taxon
OliveOlea europaeat0
Treatment
not receiving Ke0
Outcome
alternate bearinge0
Direction
more susceptiblee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In addition, trees not receiving K appeared to be more susceptible to alternate bearing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–983 · show in text ↑
t0

“Olive”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After two seasons without potassium, leaf potassium remained above the sufficiency threshold.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae0
Outcome
leaf K concentratione0
Direction
did not decrease belowe0
Value
0.8%e0
Qualifier
two seasons of omitting K fertilizatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Following two seasons of omitting K fertilization, leaf K concentration did not decrease below the conventionally accepted sufficiency threshold for olive (0.8%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1146 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Trees still produced significantly lower yields despite leaf potassium above the threshold.

Taxon
OliveOlea europaeat0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
lowere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In spite of this, the trees produced significantly lower yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1211 · show in text ↑
t0

“Olive”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–87 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend reconsidering the diagnostic leaf potassium sufficiency threshold.

Taxon
OliveOlea europaeat0
Outcome
sufficiency threshold for K in diagnostic leaves should be reconsiderede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results imply that the sufficiency threshold for K in diagnostic leaves should be reconsidered for intensive orchards.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1356–1478 · show in text ↑
t0

“Olive”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–87 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors caution that leaf potassium concentration may inadequately detect deficiency in intensive orchards.

Taxon
OliveOlea europaeat0
Outcome
K deficiency detectione0
Qualifier
may be inadequatee0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Moreover, the current method for K deficiency detection using leaf K concentration may be inadequate for intensive orchards.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1479–1603 · show in text ↑
t0

“Olive”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–87 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose additional fruit, leaf and soil measures for assessing orchard potassium status.

Taxon
OliveOlea europaeat0
Outcome
more reliable analysis of orchard K nutritional statuse0
Qualifier
fruit K content, leaf Na, and changes in soil exchangeable K content or sorption energye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Integration of other parameters, such as fruit K content, leaf Na, and changes in soil exchangeable K content or sorption energy, may promote a more reliable analysis of orchard K nutritional status.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1604–1803 · show in text ↑
t0

“Olive”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–87 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Olea europaea (common olive)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 34 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.