Abstract
The study presents the results of field experiments, the aim of which was to assess the yield of maize cultivars with different genetic profiles depending on the method of soil preparation for sowing and the method of NP fertilizer application. The yield and water content in the grain were significantly dependent on changing weather conditions in the growing seasons. Sowing maize into the soil cultivated traditionally (autumn ploughing), stay-green type cultivars and row fertilization positively influenced maize yielding. The stay-green cultivar yielded at a higher level compared to the fast maturing cultivar, the difference being significant in the year characterized by unfavourable distribution (deficit) of precipitation in the growing season. The stay-green cultivar reacted favourably to the localized application of NP fertilizer, the clear result of which was the increase in grain yield. Direct maize sowing significantly reduced the number of production ears per surface area unit and the number of grains on the ear. Selection of the stay-green cultivar and row fertilization with NP fertilizer improved this condition.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Weather conditions significantly affected maize grain yield and water content.
Zea maysNot reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The yield and water content in the grain were significantly dependent on changing weather conditions in the growing seasons.”
t0“maize cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
Traditional autumn ploughing improved maize yield.
- Treatment
- soil cultivated traditionally (autumn ploughing)e0
- Outcome
- maize yieldinge0
- Direction
- positively influencede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Sowing maize into the soil cultivated traditionally (autumn ploughing), stay-green type cultivars and row fertilization positively influenced maize yielding.”
Claim · model-written summary
Stay-green type cultivars improved maize yield.
- Material
- stay-green type cultivarse0
- Treatment
- stay-green type cultivarse0
- Outcome
- maize yieldinge0
- Direction
- positively influencede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Sowing maize into the soil cultivated traditionally (autumn ploughing), stay-green type cultivars and row fertilization positively influenced maize yielding.”
Claim · model-written summary
Row fertilization improved maize yield.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Sowing maize into the soil cultivated traditionally (autumn ploughing), stay-green type cultivars and row fertilization positively influenced maize yielding.”
Claim · model-written summary
The stay-green cultivar yielded more than the fast maturing cultivar, significantly so in the season with a precipitation deficit.
- Material
- stay-green cultivare0
- Outcome
- yieldede0
- Direction
- highere0
- Qualifier
- deficite0
- Comparator
- fast maturing cultivare0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The stay-green cultivar yielded at a higher level compared to the fast maturing cultivar, the difference being significant in the year characterized by unfavourable distribution (deficit) of precipitation in the growing season.”
t0“maize cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
Localized NP fertilizer increased grain yield of the stay-green cultivar.
- Material
- stay-green cultivare0
- Treatment
- localized application of NP fertilizere0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The stay-green cultivar reacted favourably to the localized application of NP fertilizer, the clear result of which was the increase in grain yield.”
t0“maize cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
Direct maize sowing significantly reduced production ears per area and grains per ear.
- Treatment
- Direct maize sowinge0
- Outcome
- number of production ears per surface area unit and the number of grains on the eare0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Direct maize sowing significantly reduced the number of production ears per surface area unit and the number of grains on the ear.”
Claim · model-written summary
Selecting the stay-green cultivar improved production ears and grains per ear under direct sowing.
- Treatment
- Selection of the stay-green cultivare0
- Outcome
- number of production ears per surface area unit and the number of grains on the eare0
- Direction
- improvede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Direct maize sowing significantly reduced the number of production ears per surface area unit and the number of grains on the ear. Selection of the stay-green cultivar and row fertilization with NP fertilizer improved this condition.”
t0“maize cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
Row NP fertilization improved production ears and grains per ear under direct sowing.
- Treatment
- row fertilization with NP fertilizere0
- Outcome
- number of production ears per surface area unit and the number of grains on the eare0
- Direction
- improvede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Direct maize sowing significantly reduced the number of production ears per surface area unit and the number of grains on the ear. Selection of the stay-green cultivar and row fertilization with NP fertilizer improved this condition.”
t0“maize cultivars”
The same questions in other papers
nanoparticle · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
214 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- negative
229 papers more in this group
See all 233 papers →tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
1,095 papers more in this group
See all 1,099 papers →fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
3,904 papers more in this group
See all 3,908 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.