Paper · 2019 · Annals of Applied Biology

Effect of nitrogen fertiliser and cultivation method on root systems of rice subjected to alternate wetting and drying irrigation

Raquel Santiago‐Arenas; Sholih N. Hadi; Buyung A. Fanshuri; et al.

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
22
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Better management of water and fertiliser is of critical importance for root systems development of rice, which is its first line of defence against water deficit and plays a key role in water and nutrient acquisition from soil. Two pot experiments were conducted to investigate the morphological response of root systems of rice under different doses and timings of N fertiliser application as well as cultivation methods subjected to alternate wetting and drying (AWD) irrigation. The treatments for the first pot experiment included two lowland Thai rice varieties (Pathumthani 1 and RD57), five N application doses (0, 30, 60, 90 and 120 kg N ha −1 ) and three cultivation methods (dry direct seeding [DDS], wet direct seeding [WDS] and transplanting [TP]). In the second pot experiment, root systems response of the same rice varieties was evaluated under four timings of N application (one‐split: 100% at basal; two‐split: 75% at basal and 25% at active tillering; three‐split: 50% at basal, 25% at active tillering and 25% at panicle initiation; and four‐split: 25% at basal, 25% at active tillering, 25% at panicle initiation and 25% at early flowering or before heading) applied at 60 kg ha −1 using the same cultivation methods. In both experiments, plants were subjected to AWD irrigation in which soil water potential was fluctuated between saturated condition (but not flooding) and −5 kPa. Pathumthani 1 developed better root systems (longer roots and higher root length density [RLD]) than RD57 regardless of N doses and cultivation methods. DDS resulted in higher root number, root dry matter (RDM) and root to shoot ratio at 120 kg N ha −1 , whereas the same root traits were better at 90 kg N ha −1 under WDS. TP had better root systems development at 60 kg N ha −1 . N application in four splits maximised root growth with more in number and longer roots as well as higher RLD, RDM and root to shoot ratio regardless of varieties and cultivation methods. Both rice varieties were equally suitable for growing when established under DDS, WDS and TP subjected to AWD irrigation with better root systems development at 120, 90 and 60 kg N ha −1 , respectively. N application in four splits at 60 kg ha −1 enhanced root systems development. This study revealed that N fertiliser dose and application schedule may need to be adjusted depending on cultivation method when water‐saving irrigation technique is to be used in rice production system.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pathumthani 1 developed better root systems than RD57, with longer roots and higher root length density, regardless of N dose and cultivation method.

Material
Pathumthani 1e1
Outcome
root systemse1
Comparator
RD57e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root systems development of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 81–113 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pathumthani 1 developed better root systems (longer roots and higher root length density [RLD]) than RD57 regardless of N doses and cultivation methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1413–1564 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry direct seeding gave higher root number, root dry matter and root to shoot ratio at 120 kg N per ha.

Treatment
DDSe2
Outcome
root number, root dry matter (RDM) and root to shoot ratioe2
Direction
highere2
Qualifier
120 kg N ha -1e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root systems development of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 81–113 · show in text ↑
e2

“DDS resulted in higher root number, root dry matter (RDM) and root to shoot ratio at 120 kg N ha -1”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1566–1665 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wet direct seeding gave better root traits at 90 kg N per ha.

Treatment
WDSe3
Outcome
root traitse3
Direction
bettere3
Qualifier
90 kg N ha -1e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root systems development of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 81–113 · show in text ↑
e3

“the same root traits were better at 90 kg N ha -1 under WDS”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1676–1735 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transplanting gave better root systems development at 60 kg N per ha.

Treatment
TPe4
Outcome
root systems developmente4
Direction
bettere4
Qualifier
60 kg N ha -1e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root systems development of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 81–113 · show in text ↑
e4

“TP had better root systems development at 60 kg N ha -1”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1737–1792 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N application in four splits maximised root growth, with more and longer roots.

Treatment
N application in four splitse5
Outcome
root growthe5
Direction
maximisede5
Qualifier
more in number and longer rootse5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root systems development of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 81–113 · show in text ↑
e5

“N application in four splits maximised root growth with more in number and longer roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1795–1882 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N application in four splits gave higher root length density, root dry matter and root to shoot ratio.

Treatment
N application in four splitse5
Outcome
RLD, RDM and root to shoot ratioe6
Direction
highere6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root systems development of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 81–113 · show in text ↑
e5

“N application in four splits maximised root growth with more in number and longer roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1795–1882 · show in text ↑
e6

“as well as higher RLD, RDM and root to shoot ratio regardless of varieties and cultivation methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1883–1981 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both rice varieties were equally suitable for growing under dry direct seeding, wet direct seeding and transplanting with AWD irrigation.

Material
Both rice varietiese7
Outcome
suitable for growinge7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root systems development of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 81–113 · show in text ↑
e7

“Both rice varieties were equally suitable for growing when established under DDS, WDS and TP subjected to AWD irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1983–2103 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest that N dose and application schedule may need adjusting with cultivation method when water-saving irrigation is used.

Outcome
N fertiliser dose and application schedulee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root systems development of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 81–113 · show in text ↑
e1

“N fertiliser dose and application schedule may need to be adjusted depending on cultivation method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2290–2388 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

511 papers: 402 positive, 109 negative or no effect

401 papers in the same direction as this paper · 101 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.