Abstract
Two field experiments were conducted on sugar beet crop (Beta vulgaris) to increase the quality of yield in sugar beet by applying mixtures of pre- and post-emergence herbicides and non-chemical strategies. Triflusulfuron-methyl, phenemedipham7.5+ desmedipham 1.5+ ethofumesate 11.5, S-metolachlor, propaquizafop, and clethodim, in addition, Triflusulfuron-methyl +hand hoeing, phenmedipham 7.5+ desmedipham 1.5+ ethofumesate 11.5 +hand hoeing, first hand hoeing, second hand hoeing and untreated check were evaluated. All combinations were repeated twice. Percentage of weed reduction, total of all weeds, yield, yield components, percentages of total soluble solids (TSS), total yield of sugar beet ton per feddan and the percentages of weed density were calculated. Results revealed that, triflusulfuron-methyl + hand hoeing followed by phenmedipham7.5+ desmedipham 1.5+ ethofumesate 11.5+ hand hoeing and twice hand hoeing recorded equally the same effect followed by triflusulfuron-methyl followed by first hand hoeing when compared with untreated check. The reduction (weed control) percentages were 98, 96, 96, 84 and 81, respectively compared with untreated (check) in the first season. However, in the second season, the reduction percentages were 98, 96, 96, 86 and 80, respectively. The highest value of fresh weight andthe most two abundant species weeds were Beta vulgaris and Medicago hispida. Also, the results revealed that, there were significant effects between weed control treatments on crop yield (ton/fed) and untreated check during the two seasons, where the lowest yield was 9.38 ton/fed. while, the highest yield was 32.2 ton/fed. in the twice hand hoeing treatment. On the other hand, the effect of tested herbicides on fresh weight of grassy weeds (g/m2) in two seasons, in the first season, twice hand hoeing was found to be more effective followed by clethodim, propaquizafop and then S-metolachlor, where the percentages of reduction were 99, 93, 86 and 85, respectively compared with untreated check. However, in the second season, the reduction percentages were 100, 98, 95 and 95, respectively. The highest value of fresh weight andthe most abundant weed wasPhalaris sp. Also, the results showed significant effects between weed control treatments on crop yield (ton/fed), during the first season with low crop yield (2.22 ton/fed.) in untreated check and the high crop yield (33.525 ton/fed.) in propaquizafop treatment. The highest value of crop yield was 24 ton/fed. in twice hand hoeing and the lowest was 9.3 ton/fed. in untreated check in the second season. In two seasons, data showed that weed control treatments increased the tested yield parameters as a following: triflusulfuron-methyl +hand hoeing > phenmedipham 7.5+ desmedipham 1.5+ ethofumesate 11.5 > twice hand hoeing > first hand hoeing and Pop-S. In addition, the data showed that clethodim was found to be the most effective in weed control, highest value of yield component followed by S-metolachlor, propaquizafop and then twice hand hoeing. However, clethodim was the most effective in weed control with the highest value of yield components wheras twice hand hoeing was the lowest one. It can be concluded that, triflusulfuron-methyl +hand hoeing was highly effective in weed control with highest value of yield components, while hand hoeing is the lowest one.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 16
Claim · model-written summary
Weed control combinations reduced weeds in the first season by 98, 96, 96, 84 and 81 percent compared with untreated check.
- Taxon
- sugar beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0 - Treatment
- mixtures of pre- and post-emergence herbicides and non-chemical strategiese0
- Outcome
- reduction (weed control) percentagese1
- Direction
- reductione1
- Value
- 98, 96, 96, 84 and 81e1
- Comparator
- untreated (check)e1
- Setting
- fielde0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Two field experiments were conducted on sugar beet crop (Beta vulgaris) to increase the quality of yield in sugar beet by applying mixtures of pre- and post-emergence herbicides and non-chemical strategies”
e1“The reduction (weed control) percentages were 98, 96, 96, 84 and 81, respectively compared with untreated (check) in the first season”
Claim · model-written summary
Weed control combinations reduced weeds in the second season by 98, 96, 96, 86 and 80 percent.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
- Treatment
- mixtures of pre- and post-emergence herbicides and non-chemical strategiese0
- Outcome
- reduction percentagese1
- Direction
- reductione1
- Value
- 98, 96, 96, 86 and 80e1
- Setting
- fielde0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Two field experiments were conducted on sugar beet crop (Beta vulgaris) to increase the quality of yield in sugar beet by applying mixtures of pre- and post-emergence herbicides and non-chemical strategies”
e1“However, in the second season, the reduction percentages were 98, 96, 96, 86 and 80, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Medicago hispida was among the most abundant weed species in the sugar beet trial.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise1
- Interactor
- Medicago hispidae0weed
- Outcome
- the most two abundant species weedse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest value of fresh weight andthe most two abundant species weeds were Beta vulgaris and Medicago hispida”
e1“Two field experiments were conducted on sugar beet crop (Beta vulgaris) to increase the quality of yield in sugar beet by applying mixtures of pre- and post-emergence herbicides and non-chemical strategies”
Claim · model-written summary
Twice hand hoeing gave the highest crop yield, 32.2 ton/fed, compared with the untreated check.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise2
- Treatment
- twice hand hoeinge0
- Outcome
- crop yielde1
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 32.2 ton/fede0
- Comparator
- untreated checke1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the highest yield was 32.2 ton/fed. in the twice hand hoeing treatment”
e1“significant effects between weed control treatments on crop yield (ton/fed) and untreated check”
e2“Two field experiments were conducted on sugar beet crop (Beta vulgaris) to increase the quality of yield in sugar beet by applying mixtures of pre- and post-emergence herbicides and non-chemical strategies”
Claim · model-written summary
The untreated check gave the lowest crop yield, 9.38 ton/fed.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise2
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- loweste0
- Value
- 9.38 ton/fede0
- Qualifier
- untreated checke1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the lowest yield was 9.38 ton/fed.”
e1“significant effects between weed control treatments on crop yield (ton/fed) and untreated check”
e2“Two field experiments were conducted on sugar beet crop (Beta vulgaris) to increase the quality of yield in sugar beet by applying mixtures of pre- and post-emergence herbicides and non-chemical strategies”
Claim · model-written summary
Propaquizafop gave the highest crop yield, 33.525 ton/fed, in the first season, compared with the untreated check.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise1
- Treatment
- propaquizafope0
- Outcome
- crop yielde0
- Direction
- highe0
- Value
- 33.525 ton/fede0
- Comparator
- untreated checke0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“with low crop yield (2.22 ton/fed.) in untreated check and the high crop yield (33.525 ton/fed.) in propaquizafop treatment”
e1“Two field experiments were conducted on sugar beet crop (Beta vulgaris) to increase the quality of yield in sugar beet by applying mixtures of pre- and post-emergence herbicides and non-chemical strategies”
Claim · model-written summary
The untreated check gave a low crop yield, 2.22 ton/fed, in the first season.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise1
- Outcome
- crop yielde0
- Direction
- lowe0
- Value
- 2.22 ton/fede0
- Qualifier
- untreated checke0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“with low crop yield (2.22 ton/fed.) in untreated check and the high crop yield (33.525 ton/fed.) in propaquizafop treatment”
e1“Two field experiments were conducted on sugar beet crop (Beta vulgaris) to increase the quality of yield in sugar beet by applying mixtures of pre- and post-emergence herbicides and non-chemical strategies”
Claim · model-written summary
Twice hand hoeing gave the highest crop yield, 24 ton/fed, in the second season.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise1
- Treatment
- twice hand hoeinge0
- Outcome
- crop yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 24 ton/fede0
- Comparator
- untreated checke0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest value of crop yield was 24 ton/fed. in twice hand hoeing and the lowest was 9.3 ton/fed. in untreated check in the second season”
e1“Two field experiments were conducted on sugar beet crop (Beta vulgaris) to increase the quality of yield in sugar beet by applying mixtures of pre- and post-emergence herbicides and non-chemical strategies”
Claim · model-written summary
The untreated check gave the lowest crop yield, 9.3 ton/fed, in the second season.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise1
- Outcome
- crop yielde0
- Direction
- loweste0
- Value
- 9.3 ton/fede0
- Qualifier
- untreated checke0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest value of crop yield was 24 ton/fed. in twice hand hoeing and the lowest was 9.3 ton/fed. in untreated check in the second season”
e1“Two field experiments were conducted on sugar beet crop (Beta vulgaris) to increase the quality of yield in sugar beet by applying mixtures of pre- and post-emergence herbicides and non-chemical strategies”
Claim · model-written summary
Clethodim was the most effective treatment for weed control.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise1
- Treatment
- clethodime0
- Outcome
- weed controle0
- Direction
- most effectivee0
- Comparator
- S-metolachlor, propaquizafop and then twice hand hoeinge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“clethodim was found to be the most effective in weed control, highest value of yield component followed by S-metolachlor, propaquizafop and then twice hand hoeing”
e1“Two field experiments were conducted on sugar beet crop (Beta vulgaris) to increase the quality of yield in sugar beet by applying mixtures of pre- and post-emergence herbicides and non-chemical strategies”
Claim · model-written summary
Triflusulfuron-methyl with hand hoeing was highly effective in weed control.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise1
- Treatment
- triflusulfuron-methyl +hand hoeinge0
- Outcome
- weed controle0
- Direction
- highly effectivee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“triflusulfuron-methyl +hand hoeing was highly effective in weed control with highest value of yield components”
e1“Two field experiments were conducted on sugar beet crop (Beta vulgaris) to increase the quality of yield in sugar beet by applying mixtures of pre- and post-emergence herbicides and non-chemical strategies”
Claim · model-written summary
Triflusulfuron-methyl with hand hoeing gave the highest value of yield components.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise1
- Treatment
- triflusulfuron-methyl +hand hoeinge0
- Outcome
- yield componentse0
- Direction
- highest valuee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“triflusulfuron-methyl +hand hoeing was highly effective in weed control with highest value of yield components”
e1“Two field experiments were conducted on sugar beet crop (Beta vulgaris) to increase the quality of yield in sugar beet by applying mixtures of pre- and post-emergence herbicides and non-chemical strategies”
Claim · model-written summary
Weed control treatments increased the tested yield parameters.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise1
- Treatment
- weed control treatmentse0
- Outcome
- tested yield parameterse0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“weed control treatments increased the tested yield parameters”
e1“Two field experiments were conducted on sugar beet crop (Beta vulgaris) to increase the quality of yield in sugar beet by applying mixtures of pre- and post-emergence herbicides and non-chemical strategies”
Claim · model-written summary
In the first season twice hand hoeing gave the largest reduction of grassy weed fresh weight, 99, 93, 86 and 85 percent, compared with untreated check.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise2
- Treatment
- twice hand hoeinge0
- Outcome
- fresh weight of grassy weedse1
- Direction
- reductione0
- Value
- 99, 93, 86 and 85e0
- Comparator
- untreated checke0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“in the first season, twice hand hoeing was found to be more effective followed by clethodim, propaquizafop and then S-metolachlor, where the percentages of reduction were 99, 93, 86 and 85, respectively compared with untreated check”
e1“the effect of tested herbicides on fresh weight of grassy weeds (g/m2)”
e2“Two field experiments were conducted on sugar beet crop (Beta vulgaris) to increase the quality of yield in sugar beet by applying mixtures of pre- and post-emergence herbicides and non-chemical strategies”
Claim · model-written summary
In the second season the tested herbicides reduced grassy weed fresh weight by 100, 98, 95 and 95 percent.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise2
- Treatment
- tested herbicidese1
- Outcome
- fresh weight of grassy weedse1
- Direction
- reductione0
- Value
- 100, 98, 95 and 95e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“However, in the second season, the reduction percentages were 100, 98, 95 and 95, respectively”
e1“the effect of tested herbicides on fresh weight of grassy weeds (g/m2)”
e2“Two field experiments were conducted on sugar beet crop (Beta vulgaris) to increase the quality of yield in sugar beet by applying mixtures of pre- and post-emergence herbicides and non-chemical strategies”
Claim · model-written summary
Phalaris sp. was the most abundant weed in the sugar beet trial.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise1
- Outcome
- most abundant weede0
PhalarisOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the most abundant weed wasPhalaris sp.”
e1“Two field experiments were conducted on sugar beet crop (Beta vulgaris) to increase the quality of yield in sugar beet by applying mixtures of pre- and post-emergence herbicides and non-chemical strategies”
The same questions in other papers
propaquizafop · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
triflusulfuron-methyl · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
clethodim · weed · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
triflusulfuron-methyl · weed · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
herbicide · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- negative
50 papers more in this group
See all 54 papers →herbicide · weed · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- negative
59 papers more in this group
See all 63 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.